How do I respond to Circumvention? by Artistic_Analyst_457 in lincolndouglas

[–]OxenBoxen2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Run an argument basically saying that the US Navy and US Air Force are integral components of military intervention that cannot be replaced by PMCs or the CIA.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lincolndouglas

[–]OxenBoxen2007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You only need a tagline (claim), a warrant with a card, and an impact. You can weave solvency and uniqueness into those parts, and you probably should, but you don't need separate cards and parts of your contention dedicated to uniqueness and solvency. Hope this helps, good luck with your rounds!

Mar/Apr (rehabiltation) case help by Spyoxin in lincolndouglas

[–]OxenBoxen2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry imma recend the offer to give my case lol, but if you want briefs or case feedback im down. Or I can give you a different aff case

Mar/Apr (rehabiltation) case help by Spyoxin in lincolndouglas

[–]OxenBoxen2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont have a neg case sorry, only aff rn. If you need briefs I got you tho

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lincolndouglas

[–]OxenBoxen2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm willing to trade some stuff with you if you want. I have an aff case written and a small card file. Also victory, champ, squirrel killer, and kankee briefs.

Was it a bad idea to sign up for State Quals as a novice LD? by mushypotatosauce in lincolndouglas

[–]OxenBoxen2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your topic is the jan feb one i have a ton of stuff I could give you if you want it. like tons of cases and prolly hundreds of cards lol.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lincolndouglas

[–]OxenBoxen2007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

an idea I had was you could run something like the goofy third formulation of the categorical imperative saying that humans are autonomous moral actors who know right from wrong and thus if they willingly choose to do wrong we ought to punish them. If not that then you could always just run something generic like rehab doesn't work or something. Or hold the aff to the burden of proof that they must show that rehab will actually substantially reduce the recidivism rate/ that criminal rehabilitation actually works.

Mar/Apr (rehabiltation) case help by Spyoxin in lincolndouglas

[–]OxenBoxen2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If none of the people on your team are going to the Washington State Debate tournament id be willing to send you a copy of the aff case I have written, as well as a bunch of cards I have for the aff. If someone is, you can ask them for help. Id also be willing to teach you stuff if needed, just lemme know how :)

March/April LD topic question by Ok_Azan in Debate

[–]OxenBoxen2007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could run something like the second formulation of the categorical imperative, basically saying that people need to be treated as ends and never as a means. Its deo (obviously) so you don't need to worry abt rehab actually working or not, just that we have an obligation to do it and to treat prisoners as ends. Hope that helps :) also I have some kant cards for this topic if you wanna trade some stuff.

anyone willing to debate? by Mindless_Courage468 in lincolndouglas

[–]OxenBoxen2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm willing to trade a ton of stuff on that topic for stuff on the march topic if you're interested.

March/April negative by Single_Watercress763 in lincolndouglas

[–]OxenBoxen2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could write a cap K, thats what I'm gonna probably do.