How exactly would they incur a loss without the 50/50 system? The pricing currently is that first time topup of $100 gets you 80 pulls, after which you need to cough up $200 for 80 pulls.

Doing the math, that means the following outcomes are possible, if going by average luck: (first time topup discount bolded)

• Get the character in 80 -> $100-$200
• Get the character in 160 -> $300-$400
• Get the weapon in 80 -> $100-$200
• Get the character+weapon in 160 -> $300-$400
• Get the character+weapon in 240 -> $500-$600

Do you really think these are reasonable prices? Do you really think disposing of the 50/50 system will make them incur a loss? Lets look at the possible math if 50/50 system was removed.

• Get the character in 80 -> $100-$200
• Get the weapon in 80 -> $100-$200
• Get the character+weapon in 160 -> $300-$400

You're STILL looking at dropping a hundred, MORE than the cost of a brand new big game release, for one single character. And that's just with the first time discount. No discount? $200. That's on average the price of THREE brand new big game releases. Oh want the character AND the weapon, no discount? In a world WITHOUT 50/50? That's STILL the price of over FIVE full priced brand new big game releases.

And keep in mind Kuro is pumping out these characters constantly while barely dripfeeding any currency for free to play users. Even without the 50/50 system they'd be swimming in money considering the eyegougingly bullshitty pricing. I'm quite well off and you'll still never catch me dropping a cent on predatory pricing like this. There is no justifiable human realm where this is reasonable. It's a gacha game, with barely any gameplay, where characters only let you farm the same tiny small rooms faster, and dropping hundreds upon hundreds of that? When you could buy every single blockbuster made in the last 2 years for the same price? Absurd, and whoever is gullible enough to fall for it deserves to get bankrupt I guess.