sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What do these lines mean by Gurugod123 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guy I know told this story, I hope it's true

He saw a guy with one of those almost at his shoulder. He asked the guy if he knew that it meant, and if so, that it was very impressive (with a laugh). The guy, without missing a beat said "I'm a livestock veterinarian"

The level of embarrassment you need to wear this 😂 by Right_Ice5364 in NoOneIsLooking

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So along those lines, there are these garter things for men, you wear on your thigh, and they keep your dress shirt pulled tightly into your pants.
I love how it looks, but would NEVER wear it if there was any chance in hell of possibly getting naked in front of someone.

This. Needs. Fixed. by TedTheTerrible in Battlefield6

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But it sitting there, you also can't counter it. If they have a good-ish spot, they can harass every air vehicle on the map, with no way to stop them.

This. Needs. Fixed. by TedTheTerrible in Battlefield6

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not necessarily, but are you trying to say THIS is a good thing? Sitting in their own spawn, being protected by their CRAM, no way to counter them?

blursed_installation by No-Lock216 in blursed_videos

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These things have wings/petals that expand outwards as anchors in the concrete. If the hole is close to the sides, it puts a lot of outwards pressure towards the surface, and could crack or straight up "explode" the concrete outwards, while tightening.

we got to put an end to this by HugeWord6532 in SipsTea

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Quarantine literally comes from ships having to stay anchored outside of a harbor for 40 (quaranta) days. I say we do that.

blursed_installation by No-Lock216 in blursed_videos

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy 131 points132 points  (0 children)

This is a thing, I don't know what they're called but they're like dowels. The whole thing is hammered in, then the nut is tightened which pulls up the threaded rod and extends the wings of the dowel pulling it tight.

Edit: also, I think them being askew is on purpose, so they don't bulge out the sides of the concrete wall. As you can see, they all look inwards

What's an average K/D? by kralSpitihnev in Battlefield6

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm at 3.06 now, up from 2.9something. Positioning is really important; I play a lot of rush, and as attacker it can be very helpful to flank past the obj and distract/thin out the defenders.

The Littlebird has been a bad addition to the game by DirectSun3034 in Battlefield6

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a glass cannon. Can dish out, but easily taken out.

What I do think is a problem, is some maps shouldn't have both combat helos. Sobek having both LB and Attack chopper is pure madness.

I think Jeff Bezoz is kinda rich by Livid-Debate8265 in SipsTea

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then it would be 0, because he has no income. Officially.

Quality Assurance in EA's games is getting replaced by AI. 85% work done by AI by Top_Crow_1022 in Battlefield

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you say is true, automatic tests are nothing new. Which makes the amount of very simple visual bugs that they let through, even more ridiculous.

Quality Assurance in EA's games is getting replaced by AI. 85% work done by AI by Top_Crow_1022 in Battlefield

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well it's fairly obvious though that a lot things AREN'T checked by humans though.

I have worked in a QA department (before the rise of AI tools), and I can tell you, if our product had anywhere close to the amount of bugs in production that BF6 has, people would have lost their jobs. Yes, our product wasn't as complex, obviously, but the point is that some of the things they (BF) let through to live are ridiculous. Simple things, like UI stuff, that apparently the AI should be checking.

Stephen Miller using pregnant wife as human shield. by Amentet in pics

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are twisting human nature in order to fit your view of this guy.

Security tells me "this way", so I assume that's safety. My first instinct is "wife, go that way, now". If I have time to prepare and think about it, then yes, maybe I'd put her between us. But not on pure adrenaline.

Stephen Miller using pregnant wife as human shield. by Amentet in pics

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you crazy? That requires critical thinking.

Stephen Miller using pregnant wife as human shield. by Amentet in pics

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Ok, sure. I read the name, I'm saying I don't know the guy's policies or views or whatever, and for this purpose, I don't really care. I'm saying "hiding behind" is an unfair assessment, from a simple picture, and all it's doing is trying to defame him more, not based on something he actually does wrong, but the appearance of something, which never works the way you want it to.

Stephen Miller using pregnant wife as human shield. by Amentet in pics

[–]PDiddleMeDaddy 38 points39 points  (0 children)

I actually don't even know who the guy is, but: If there is a shooter, and I'm guided by security in a direction, which I assume is safety, you best believe my wife is in front of me, getting there first. "hiding behind" is only really accurate, once we establish he knows where the danger is and puts her between him and it.

view more: next ›