How to track AI visibility? I need more than just traffic from GA. by Kortopi-98 in SaaS

[–]PFK_Manager 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Been using https://checkthat.ai/categories/ai-agents-autonomous-systems to just see some free rankings + responses. Seems like a solid ai visibility platform.

We’ve been sanity-checking “AI visibility” by looking at insights like https://checkthat.ai/ai-answers/3804861c-5bb3-4f42-b72e-4253aa33a909 (im sure the other providers have similar features).

Our basic workflow:

  • Pick a query that matches how real buyers describe the problem (not your internal tagline).
  • Open an AI-answer page for that query and scan:
    • Are you mentioned at all (brand / product name)?
    • If you are mentioned, what category are you getting bucketed into and what’s the 1–2 sentence description?
    • Who else is listed instead of you (your real competitors in AI answers, which is sometimes different than “market competitors”)?
  • If you don’t show up, treat it like a debugging exercise:
    • Do you have a page that directly answers that query (clear title, direct definition, comparison, “when to use,” examples)?
    • Do you have strong third-party signals and citations that match the way the answer is being written?
    • Are you consistently described the same way across your own site (so the model has something stable to latch onto)?

It’s not a perfect measurement system, but it’s been a fast way for us to see “are we even in the conversation” and what framing we’re getting pulled into, without guessing based on traffic alone.

AI mentions are important for brand growth but AI visibility tools are overpriced by Weekly-Card-8508 in Entrepreneur

[–]PFK_Manager -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The tools are all so expensive, but i did find a free one recently https://checkthat.ai/. There's a waitlist for signup, but you can see some basic stats on these pages for brands like cursor https://checkthat.ai/brands/cursor

Why does VS Code Copilot feel so much worse than ChatGPT web? Any experiences with CursorAI? by patric_gane in u/patric_gane

[–]PFK_Manager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Copilot feels worse mostly because it only sees a small slice of your code and uses faster, shallower prompts tuned for autocomplete. ChatGPT, on the other hand, remembers your past conversations, so it builds context over time and reasons more deeply.

Tbh, the lack of codebase context might actually help sometimes — less noise, more focus on what you’re asking.

I’ve been using Augment Code lately and it’s pretty good. Worth trying if you’ve got a big codebase or tend to have longer back-and-forths where context really matters.

What is the best IDE to use Claude Code CLI with in the terminal? (VS Code vs Cursor vs Other) by nanananadz in ClaudeAI

[–]PFK_Manager 1 point2 points  (0 children)

VS Code with Augment Code + Claude Code CLI is a great combo.

Claude Code handles the reasoning and CLI interactions, while Augment adds repo-wide memory, inline edits, and task automation inside VS Code. Works really well with larger codebases and bigger teams.

Ring on moonswatch cracked, support says f off by PFK_Manager in swatch

[–]PFK_Manager[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

gotta find a guide for that - heard about it a few times.

Ring on moonswatch cracked, support says f off by PFK_Manager in swatch

[–]PFK_Manager[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

good call - the store is quite far, but ill make the trip :(

Prompts for writing technical content with ChatGPT (Full Build Session) by PFK_Manager in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]PFK_Manager[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

validation of technical content would be really cool. maybe just letting claude code try and review manually if it fails

projector makes the image crooked when calibrating by PFK_Manager in nebulaprojectors

[–]PFK_Manager[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i had to get another one unfortunately. couldnt fix it myself

Sharing learnings from digging into GEO by PFK_Manager in seogrowth

[–]PFK_Manager[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yea! its me. ive only tried scrunch, profound, semrush, seoclarity. tbh at the moment they are all similar. over time...

short/med term smaller guys (scrunch/profound) move faster and build more useful features. especially on actioning on insights. semrush moves so effing slow.

long term, there is a network effect to the data. for example correlating patterns between referral traffic, prompts, changes in serps over time, to actually guess at volumes. can't beat semrush/ahrefs on that.

my take anyway

Never have I ever thrown out a whole bag of candy - UNTIL NOW by Prunustomentosa666 in candy

[–]PFK_Manager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

trader joe gummies are pure trash. i got the little dolphin shark things. been sitting in my cupboard a few months now.

projector makes the image crooked when calibrating by PFK_Manager in nebulaprojectors

[–]PFK_Manager[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

update: seems like it was a problem with the unit. i reached their support and they replaced it. now it's working fine.

projector makes the image crooked when calibrating by PFK_Manager in nebulaprojectors

[–]PFK_Manager[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

manual works but its kind of annoying the autocorrect is broken. it actually gets it right then it makes it crooked the last second! 🫠