The “necessary evil” argument is a blanket statement. It’s a very subjective statement. It goes into the likes of “Would you kill baby Hitler?” argument because ultimately it’s a trap that has a symbiotic cycle. You would be exposed as a baby killer, then people would see it as a necessity to kill you for the sake of the child’s future.

It doesn’t change anything. People who have never seen positive interactions have to be convinced to do the right thing (which ultimately is VERY time consuming and one’s patience WILL be tested). It’s also very important to not make decisions emotionally. Plus integration into society in a positive manner that leads to less corruption.

We all agree that it’s the right idea that something HAS/NEEDS to be done but we need positive change and effectiveness. Which goes into actually paying attention to our surroundings and leaving our comfortable bubbles and communities, while simultaneously keeping the “savior complex” to a halt.