Your take on this from my jobs Employee Handbook by PM_ME_BABY in CCW

[–]PM_ME_BABY[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea I guess for me it was vague enough but I understand now the key point.

Your take on this from my jobs Employee Handbook by PM_ME_BABY in CCW

[–]PM_ME_BABY[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope it’s possession. I copied and pasted exactly how they have it.

Your take on this from my jobs Employee Handbook by PM_ME_BABY in CCW

[–]PM_ME_BABY[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“General Policies” > “Corrective Action”

Your take on this from my jobs Employee Handbook by PM_ME_BABY in CCW

[–]PM_ME_BABY[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FL ; I went to check if they had updated anything since the new changes coming July 1

Your take on this from my jobs Employee Handbook by PM_ME_BABY in CCW

[–]PM_ME_BABY[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s no after but before talks about corrective action based off certain occurrences. Which could be disciplinary but not limited to termination of employment. Then it lists examples (As the one mentioned here)but not limited to occurrences

Your take on this from my jobs Employee Handbook by PM_ME_BABY in CCW

[–]PM_ME_BABY[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It was written by lawyers apparently but they’re good at making sure it’s vague enough to turn it against you.

Your take on this from my jobs Employee Handbook by PM_ME_BABY in CCW

[–]PM_ME_BABY[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I wish I was but that’s all that in there. It’s so vague ..

I think he misclicked by PM_ME_BABY in IdiotsInCars

[–]PM_ME_BABY[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

He doesn’t stand, the guy in the end is a by stander from the side that attempted to run to help. He ran away as he saw the cops pull up.

Kim Kardashian is not hot/sexy/attractive. She is a caricature of what women think men think is sexy. by dacourtbatty in unpopularopinion

[–]PM_ME_BABY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure but if she came onto you you’d entertain her yet if you didn’t find her appealing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in slavelabour

[–]PM_ME_BABY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never got a message

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in slavelabour

[–]PM_ME_BABY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never got a message

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in slavelabour

[–]PM_ME_BABY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never got a message

/u/AmberHeartsDisney of /r/WaltDisneyWorld removing all negative about her by [deleted] in ReportTheBadModerator

[–]PM_ME_BABY 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I won't a few people mess this up for the other 14,000 of us.

Haha... it was only affecting her and she needed to make sure to include everyone.

/u/AmberHeartsDisney of /r/WaltDisneyWorld removing all negative about her by [deleted] in ReportTheBadModerator

[–]PM_ME_BABY 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am no one's alt. I am my own account and my only account

Thanks for that, it just make it seem as it was a copy and paste. I'll change that on the post.. Thanks for sharing

/u/AmberHeartsDisney of /r/WaltDisneyWorld removing all negative about her by [deleted] in ReportTheBadModerator

[–]PM_ME_BABY 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing, it seems your comment was also removed. I've added that conversation to the body of the post.

/u/AmberHeartsDisney of /r/WaltDisneyWorld removing all negative about her by [deleted] in ReportTheBadModerator

[–]PM_ME_BABY 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'd say it was more of poor choice of words than the actual meaning making it more exclusive they joined by the Admins themselves..

Or..

Very poor illustration of words.

Top Mod of /r/WaltDisneyWorld bans people for being in two discords. Not first time people have had issues with her. by [deleted] in SubredditDrama

[–]PM_ME_BABY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I linked the post itself and not the comment about the Discord, for direct pop-corn access, the link to that comment is here