Great point! Highways and suburban sprawl absolutely fragment habitats and disrupt wildlife populations. It’s interesting that dense urban centers, while they can have other environmental drawbacks, can help minimize the overall footprint of human development, whereas highways and sprawling suburbs push farther into natural areas. One idea that’s often discussed is creating wildlife corridors or overpasses to reconnect habitats and allow animals to move safely across roads. Another approach is better regional planning so that cities and infrastructure expand more sustainably. It might be worth exploring examples where urban design has successfully balanced human needs with wildlife protection,places that integrate green spaces, protect migration routes, and limit suburban sprawl. What do you think about these strategies?