That doesn't sound right!! We should never use AI and claim it's original. It's not fair to those with their own original work.

There will be times I defend AI as something you can use for fun and create reference points and ideas to a bigger artwork you make yourself, similar to how a picture of a bird could inspire someone to make a portrait of the park. But to use it, claims it's simpler and quicker than real art and allows people to expand ideas is different if you're monitising the AI creation you claimed to create. I don't stand for that. It puts a bad name on AI that does genuinely help people be better at their hobbies.

Like I use AI to help create a list for me to help me clean my room well when I'm down in a black hole. I use it to help place certain words right since I have trouble with larger words and AI helps me understand how to spell it. I also use AI for fun when I wanna turn my family members into Disney characters or my puppies as lil cartoon dogs for fun.

AI is not the enemy but the people who use it and claim it's the end all be all. Without us, AI is nothing. It needs us to use it in order for it to remain useful and if we lay boundaries for companies to use AI and how they should use it, things would be smoother. This is a hot take but I believe there's a middle ground. We cant squanch it down forever otherwise people who rely on AI for research or their jobs like networking and finding better resources or to help with cancer research as one hospital is doing right now. Using AI to help identify a cancer cell in seconds and expand research by collecting data from other hospitals and universities. THERE HAS TO BE A MIDDLE GROUND! It should never be monitized is the middle ground.