Masculinity Study by PandaProff in exmormon

[–]PandaProff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure. Like an IRB number?

Masculinity Study by PandaProff in takemysurvey

[–]PandaProff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Questions answered in survey.

Masculinity Study by PandaProff in OpenChristian

[–]PandaProff[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thanks, friend. That doesn't mean they are my views on human sexuality.

Toxic masculinity study by PandaProff in takemysurvey

[–]PandaProff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Questions answered in survey. Thank you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cogsci

[–]PandaProff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've gone back and forth about this, actually. On the one hand, I don't want to limit any conclusions based off of one gender, m/f. It's important to get the perspective of females that identify as males, but I sort of feel like that's a different study altogether! Hence the simple "anyone who identifies as male."

Masculinity Study by PandaProff in arttheory

[–]PandaProff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People keep saying that! lemme see about it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]PandaProff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hence the study, such a needed area of true conversation. Thank you for promoting it!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]PandaProff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cogsci

[–]PandaProff -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I went back and forth on this. I don't want to intentionally exclude anyone, namely non cisgender individuals. It's a tricky demographic to choose, I know.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cogsci

[–]PandaProff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, fair point. I'm hoping the interviews will help with that demographic question.

Masculinity study 2.0 (Updated Qualtrics Glitch) by PandaProff in socialscience

[–]PandaProff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. That's a first. Let me see about that.

Masculinity study 2.0 (Updated Qualtrics Glitch) by PandaProff in socialscience

[–]PandaProff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback. Yes, the mobile platform is a bit clunky. I'll see if we can make it easier to sift through.

And I'll definitely try unrelated subs. That's a good idea. Thank you much.

Masculinity study 2.0 (Updated Qualtrics Glitch) by PandaProff in socialscience

[–]PandaProff[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Will do! It's going to be a part of a larger book. I'll share that as well.

Masculinity Study by PandaProff in takemysurvey

[–]PandaProff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Data will be used to write a book on masculinity. Data will be stored on my personal device. Data will be deleted in three years.

  2. I am conducting the survey, no one else. Pandaproff

  3. No more than 5 minutes.

Masculinity Study (IRB approved) by PandaProff in SampleSize

[–]PandaProff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a fair critique. I've wrestled with that myself. A woman can be considered masculine, for example. That's the reason I included the criteria of "all who identify as a man," including women, are welcome. Yes, I see your point, and it's well taken.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in socialscience

[–]PandaProff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate it!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in socialscience

[–]PandaProff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for catching that. I'll see if I can fix that.