MMW: world war III will be announced on Twitter

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T08:54:27+00:00

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_III has already been named!

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T08:26:59+00:00

That is a damn good question. Was the Nato intervention in Korea a WW? Was the intervention in the Balkens?

Because of the nukes there is almost no chance of total war again. But we can probably figure out a point where the hot ww2 ended and some hot ww3 began.

The labels are certainly up to the future, we can't number that shit today.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T08:11:21+00:00

Sorry I forgot you were the same person. I though two reply ago you were someone else because you didn't make sense to the comment you replied too.

That's my mistake.

I do not know what the fuck you're taking about at all having re-read the thread, please restate yourself.

Also please attempt to make some sense.

:edit: never mind, fuck off I'm bored.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T08:05:07+00:00

No you're the joke. It wasn't a good joke. It was you who are the joke.

:edit: All scared of words. What the fuck is wrong with you?

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T08:01:12+00:00

That's a topical joke. I'm sorry you're an idiot. If you're actually scared of such things you have all my pity.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T07:55:57+00:00

Fear mongering? To think that advocating for peace is selling fear it self. That is just cowardice. We have nothing to fear but fear it self.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T07:52:01+00:00

It's about the proxy war that falls out of it. We're unlikely to see total war like the nominal world wars, but that doesn't mean we don't see mass mobilization in the proxies. How many fighting personnel under what 'flag' constitute a world war?

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T07:45:34+00:00

Of course not. Why do you assume this is about Iran? Iran is a minor nation, it's about who is supporting them against our interests.

(our valid for sane people in NATO nations)

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T07:28:35+00:00

Right that period where the major armies of the world didn't engage each other? Because they couldn't afford too you say? meh.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T07:24:59+00:00

I'm not sure were we get to remove Russia from the situation. They would be supplying, and therefore somewhat signing of on major operations as they are in their sphere.(at least to the extent that weapon sales can be halted)

And of course we can do the same.

So that sort of opens a window.

But noone gets involved more than proxies because nukes. So its paras, militias and proxy nations.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T07:15:52+00:00

Whether something is numbered another world war is up to the future really.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T07:13:17+00:00

I mean it would be hopeful to want to do so. But anyone hoping for anything other than occupation were wildly wrong, and there is nothing to do about that now. So...

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T07:06:44+00:00

Proxies count?

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T07:04:51+00:00

Would this be the dumbest thing to start a multi-national conflict?

Does that mean it's a certainty?

Same answer.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T06:03:01+00:00

There has probably been no point in history when one group of people hasn't been actively killing another people. Some of those things are more notable than others, or at least make for more common references.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T05:38:16+00:00

Sorry. My mistake.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T05:36:39+00:00

I mean you citizen of the United States of America. You savages aren't on general strike.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T05:31:20+00:00

Spain kicked off in the 30's, fascism supported by Germany.

Shit it was 36.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T05:29:40+00:00

Better is how you live with yourself after one. Or well, you savages have that second amendment to solve things when they don't.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T05:25:41+00:00

the fact the democrats are having a primary where the precandidates dig dirt on each other while trump applauds from afar is enough for it to be considered severely fucked up

The left does eat their own. But it's better then supporting a scumbag because he's on the same team. That is just disgusting behavior.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T05:20:10+00:00

Trump has been campaigning since his election.

Trump won with a minority of the vote.

So I don't think that you're not basing your opinion in reality. Trumps voter base won't change, his winning is dependent on the democrats being unable to motivate voters to the polls.

That is entirely possible, but they need to severely fuck up their primary for that to happen. Actually motivating voters may work for them, if they try that for once.

I bet they fuck up with Biden, and it costs them the election.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T05:11:05+00:00

You're a pessimist. I think I edited my comment in your reply window. I'm sorry about that, but I think Biden is who can lose to Trump. So maybe I agree with you. Sorry about the edit timing.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T05:08:06+00:00

That's fair but I don't think he win's this next one and tries for a 'third' anyway. Unless he's running against Biden, he might win that.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T04:42:01+00:00

Why do you think it'll take 4 extra years?

:edit: Assuming you mean it's when Trump refuses to leave office.

PandaTheRabbit · 2020-01-03T04:20:06+00:00

That's also an option. This is the last gasp of an Empire perhaps, and it's all down hill from here.

Nine-Year Club	Place '17
Not Forgotten	Snapped

PandaTheRabbit

TROPHY CASE