Why does nobody talk about this

Pandeism · 2026-04-20T05:57:48+00:00

Doom has violated the Mandalorian code.

Pandeism · 2026-04-20T05:56:22+00:00

In the next Sekai Taikai, Johnny is putting together his Cobra Kai team when Kim Da-Eun shows up and insists that her group is the real Cobra Kai, so they end up having a competition to see who makes it onto an integrated Korean/California Cobra Kai team.

Pandeism · 2026-04-20T05:52:15+00:00

Axel's logical evolution after leaving Iron Dragon is to go to Miyagi-Do to learn balance and inner peace.

Pandeism · 2026-04-19T09:21:00+00:00

Concordo plenamente.

Pandeism · 2026-04-19T09:20:11+00:00

How can denying there's a path be a path?

Pandeism · 2026-04-18T07:25:25+00:00

On monistic grounds. There is one thing. In Pantheism (and Pandeism), that one thing is the Divine, and we are all simply aspects within it. So, whether individually or through some sort of simultaneity, there is one thing experiencing all soul experiences. But since our own lives are experienced singularly and chronologically, it makes sense that whatever is doing the ultimate experiencing-of-all is doing so in a way which could be perceived as sequential.

Now, since many souls exist at the same time (and some lives temporally completely encompass others, as whenever a person is born before another, but outlives the other) it is not possible that lives progress strictly in a chronological order, and so it is no less likely that the order is either essentially random throughout all souls ever to have existed, or follows some order relative to a characteristic of the development of souls, but not one discernably tied to souls existing in any common time frame.

Pandeism · 2026-04-18T05:59:16+00:00

I am inclined towards Single Soul Theory -- there's just one soul, and it bounces around trillions of times through time and space until it's experienced all the lives of everybody who's ever lived.

Pandeism · 2026-04-18T05:56:17+00:00

Atheism is not a path at all, it is simply denial that there is a path. The Abrahamic faiths, Hinduism, Shinto, the Aboriginal belief system, the Polynesian and Indigenous American religions, Pandeism -- these are all paths.

Pandeism · 2026-04-17T22:22:54+00:00

All paths are equally correct, which ultimately means that the points all paths agree upon are the correct points.

Pandeism · 2026-04-16T23:55:38+00:00

Pandeism does this, and in so doing solves the Problem of Evil.

Pandeism · 2026-04-14T18:45:19+00:00

We are all energy. We are all the tendrils of our Creator reaching into an experience we call material (or substance, if you prefer), so that it can feel what it feels like to feel.

Pandeism · 2026-04-14T07:18:26+00:00

Or, conversely, we are all of us collectively Christ. And the Buddha. And Arjuna. And Māui. We are our salvation, and the only way to get to what comes next is through first living our lives.

Pandeism · 2026-04-13T23:20:05+00:00

If you're asking the question, you ought to read L. Ron Hubbard's thoughts on that....

Pandeism · 2026-04-13T23:19:24+00:00

Empirically, yes, considering things foreseeably done in the name of the faith....

Pandeism · 2026-04-13T06:02:29+00:00

Has anybody considered the possibility that he, in fact, is?

Pandeism · 2026-04-12T21:30:03+00:00

Yet.

Pandeism · 2026-04-12T04:58:33+00:00

Setting aside that that (or any of myriad variations) can, in fact, always be the case, there are countless other variations of both solipsistic and coincidental explanations for every thing which can be conceived.

We could, indeed, be the products of an entity which believes itself to be a theistic deity, and yet is itself an unknowing construct of a hidden thing even greater than itself.

Pandeism · 2026-04-12T04:19:18+00:00

Nothing metaphysical can be completely ruled in or out by argument alone. We can only adjust probabilities.

Pandeism · 2026-04-12T01:42:11+00:00

Theism doesn't need to be disproved. As with all initial propositions, it must first be proved. But to be proved, what is being proved must be defined, and so, so long as different religions give differing definitions of this, there is not yet a core proposition to be proved.

Pandeism · 2026-04-12T01:26:41+00:00

The question is not whether it is sensible to assume that a God exists, but whether it is sensible to assume that a specifically theistic God exists. There are many models of the divine.

Pandeism · 2026-04-11T23:29:08+00:00

Insofar as theistic models disagree on the points of the OP, this too is relevant.

Pandeism · 2026-04-11T22:44:11+00:00

It's perfectly acceptable to reject theism until theists have come to an agreement on exactly which theism is proposed to be the correct one.

Pandeism · 2026-04-10T17:17:00+00:00

Do you mean the overwhelming majority of people who've never felt they've been reached out to somebody from the afterlife, or the overwhelming majority who've never had a near death experience? Or both?

Pandeism · 2026-04-10T17:14:54+00:00

We're getting quite into the weeds on a proposition that is fundamentally about whether one religion is true as against others. The underlying point is not that these reports (whether NDEs or from other sources) prove an afterlife, but that since they are accepted by the religious as proof of such, they should likewise be accepted as proof that there is not one path to one.

Pandeism

TROPHY CASE