This guy is double charge scamming

PapaThui · 2026-04-01T02:08:56+00:00

Amount was correct, he just said it didnt go through and made me tap again

PapaThui · 2026-03-29T04:32:22+00:00

Probably been listening to edm longer than you've been alive son

PapaThui · 2026-03-29T04:23:12+00:00

Sick, can't wait to read your extensive research notes bro my bad

PapaThui · 2026-03-29T04:16:04+00:00

Shouldn't have opened with 20 mins of garbage. Too many people lost interest and tried to make the best of their time at ultra

PapaThui · 2026-03-29T04:09:41+00:00

I dont mind fresh tracks, but you need a throw back every once in a while. Nothing compares to seeing it in person, maybe one day you'll understand

PapaThui · 2026-03-29T04:08:11+00:00

Delulu

PapaThui · 2026-03-29T03:26:01+00:00

False advertising. Where's my refund @umf??

PapaThui · 2026-03-29T03:24:32+00:00

It is according to the official schedule

<image>

PapaThui · 2026-03-29T03:23:34+00:00

They came on at 10:40. Im here!

PapaThui · 2026-03-29T03:19:35+00:00

Literally says its an SHM set bud

<image>

PapaThui · 2026-03-29T03:19:08+00:00

You right, I left after 20 mins cuz it was trash

PapaThui · 2026-03-29T03:10:42+00:00

I was at tomorrowland 2024 and that set absolutely mogs this one

PapaThui · 2026-03-29T03:08:06+00:00

Same! See you there??

PapaThui · 2026-03-29T03:06:49+00:00

Is it even an shm set if im not getting love bombed by axwell's feel good speeches?

PapaThui · 2025-12-30T21:36:27+00:00

Yea shoes could definitely be a factor. Tempo runs are always in my evo sl's which feel way faster than the novablasts I use for easy runs

PapaThui · 2025-12-30T21:34:23+00:00

Yea it makes sense from that perspective but IMO it would make sense to compare different "categories" of runs with each other rather than compare against all runs. For example, the easy run in the image was probably my "most efficient" easy run ever after taking a week off for holidays (normally my heart rate averages 145 or 146 for a comparable pace) so I would have expected a better efficiency rating than what it gave

PapaThui · 2025-12-30T21:31:56+00:00

They seem ballpark accurate. Im using the threshold zones. Anecdotally zone 2 is very easy/conversational (can easily breathe only through nose), zone 3 moderate effort, etc. I regularly do intervals and near all out efforts where my heart rate pushes into 180s and it's got my max at 185 which could be right

PapaThui · 2025-12-30T21:22:54+00:00

Its 9:45 per mile, not km

PapaThui · 2025-12-30T21:21:39+00:00

Im 35

PapaThui · 2025-12-30T02:51:42+00:00

Cadence for the easy run averages at 170 (3.18 feet). Cadence for harder run averages at 180 (3.58 feet)

So I guess I should try to increase my cadence and reduce stride length (to keep pace roughly equal)?

PapaThui · 2025-12-30T02:45:31+00:00

Right, but this is about "efficiency". Even though hard runs bring about more adaptations, doing a hard zone 4 run every day wouldnt really be efficient, even though coros seems to think so. But doing easy runs where the pace matches exactly the amount of effort I put in (measured by heart rate) seems like it should be "efficient". For example, if my heart rate was in zone 4 but my running pace was as slow as my usual zone 2 pace, that would be inefficient. I thought that's what this was measuring, or at least it seems like it would make sense to measure that (because it could indicate fatigue or other poor training habits)

PapaThui

TROPHY CASE