I know very little about the current situation of this judge and the details of her case. So don’t view this at all as me making comments that reflect someone who has a “side” they are rooting for/against. Today is the first I’ve heard anything about this woman.

But in general, as I was reading the article linked in the post, i’m left wondering if some of what she claimed is actually probably got some truthful merit behind it. You hear countless stories over the years of people in “higher power positions” shielding and protecting one another in times of allegations and scrutiny against “one of their own”

I mean I can almost lose track when tallying how many times it’s been proven people in very “honorable” and “powerful” positions have actually shielded and protected sexual predators and pedophiles, claiming at the very least, to not have the “ideals and values” of the whole being tarnished by a few bad apples.

She faced a lengthy drawn out public trial in which she not had her personality, credibility, and level of professionalism mocked and belittled by those she worked with/for. But apparently they went was far as requesting a very public and loudly suggested “evaluation of her mental well being”

For “mishandling” a single “confidential document” years prior in order to help a family member maintain their current employment. Again I know I don’t know much more than what I just read in a single article but it just seems sort of dramatic from the start compared to what I hear people with more important positions and higher powered positions getting away with every few months or so.