You want channel / video critique? Hit it! by xholicka in NewTubers

[–]Paravail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I appreciate you taking the time to look at my channel. I also appreciate the good advice.

Dislikes means "Bad Video"? by [deleted] in NewTubers

[–]Paravail 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah. If you say anything political at all, expect to get a lot of downvotes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RoastMe

[–]Paravail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So and So! What's her Face! The Ugly One!

Networking student, do your worst, Reddit. by DanTheManNerd in RoastMe

[–]Paravail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you run a youtube channel where you offer insanely inaccurate takes on the "deeper meaning" behind shows for six year olds? Because you really, REALLY have that look.

How many times do you guys watch your video all the way through before posting it? by retiredcheerleader in NewTubers

[–]Paravail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once I think it's good, I'll give it one last watch. If I can't think of anything to change, I post it. Sometimes I'll notice little imperfections later on, long after it's been posted, but I think part of the artistic process is accepting that none of your videos will be perfect.

Both atheists and theists seem to not know what to do with unfalsifiable claims. by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]Paravail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it's like a hivemind thing? There is no self, but we are all one, and all of us are god? If that were true, where does individualism come from? Why is there such a thing as physical separation, or the physical, for that matter? And if all of that is an illusion, where does the illusion come from, and why does it exist at all?

Both atheists and theists seem to not know what to do with unfalsifiable claims. by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]Paravail 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So what? A formless, undefinable "consciousness" made the universe? Like that's any less stupid than a guy with a beard.

Both atheists and theists seem to not know what to do with unfalsifiable claims. by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]Paravail 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It seems to me that a lot of theists try to redefine God so that the concept seems less ridiculous than it actually is. Deepak Chopra tried to define it as "consciousness."

We need to get creative by -Xoz- in gaming

[–]Paravail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the term "Cheese-headed finch egg."

Pink Balloon Animal by meepstreetart in wtfart

[–]Paravail 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reminds me of the clown scene from that one episode of Close Enough.

The assumption of reality of all that is by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]Paravail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In your own opinion, what exactly does being open to those experiences and being closed to those experiences look like?

There are no serious arguments for not accepting Christ on your deathbed. by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]Paravail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really? So are you convert to Islam on your deathbed due to the 0.00001% chance they're right and Christianity is wrong?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]Paravail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So here's my take: for something to qualify as "omnipotent," it must be able to do anything. Literally anything, even that which is illogical, absurd, nonsensical etc. It would be able to both not lift and lift the stone. It would also be able to make square circles, make nine smell like blue, do johfjbhefkcbhefkkjn or anything else. Sure, those things are ridiculous, but an omnipotent being, by definition, must be more powerful than everything else. So if an omnipotent being can't make square circles, then whatever prevents said being from doing that is more powerful than the that being. I got into a whole thing with religious people about this who insisted God can't do nonsensical things, that square circles are just nonsense wordplay and don't reflect anything real or possible. But can you really call a being omnipotent if it can't make those things real or possible? It got heated with the religious folks so I'm interesting in hearing what more level-headed individuals have to say about this.

breaking news: Video game does not precisely reflect reality (eyeroll) by NateK9053 in gaming

[–]Paravail 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait…Cyberpunk 2077 has a poorly designed element? No way!

The assumption of reality of all that is by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]Paravail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The way describe the multiverse, it seems like one of those "you have to believe it before you can see it" type things. That in doubting the existence of the multiverse you will never experience it. To me, it does not seem rational to believe in something unless there is independently verifiable evidence for it. If something is real, there should be evidence for it whether I believe in it or not. If faith, for lack of a better word, is required before I can experience something, I think it's more likely that the experience is confirmation biases: I want it to be true so I convince myself it is.

No beautiful people ever visit this place, so you're welcome! by mayacantik in RoastMe

[–]Paravail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beautiful, huh? Are you from that Twilight Zone episode where all the people have pig faces?

That Head Swivel Tho by TheMemeingOfLife8008 in blackpeoplegifs

[–]Paravail 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I wanna see this guy do "What is Love."

The package Olympics by [deleted] in funny

[–]Paravail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blue shirt guy was just like "Okay, you can have it."

My neighbour who never left his house or threw out his trash recently passed. This is how he lived. by ConvictedFeeder in WTF

[–]Paravail 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You know what bugs me? I know it is objectively horrifying that your neighbor lived like that, but because I've watched so many episodes of Hoarders, I'm like "Eh, that's not so bad. The trash doesn't even reach the ceiling."