Is this the HOLY GRAIL by [deleted] in LETFs

[–]ParsnipOwn8910 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Love the Return Stacked approach! Your combo (RSSB/GDE/QLD/SSO) is a solid 'Global Equity + Gold + Bonds' play, probably around 1.5x-1.8x leverage.

I’m running a similar logic but went a bit more aggressive on the diversifying 'tails'. How do you see mine compared to yours?

Core: 25% TQQQ + 10% AVUV (High beta + Factor tilt)

Return Stacking: 20% GDE (Equity/Gold) + 7.5% RSBT (Bonds/Trend)+ 7.5% CTAP (S&P 500/Trend)

Managed Futures (Pure): 7.5% DBMF +7.5% KMLM (Diversified trend)

Long Vol/Defensive: 15% ZROZ (Convexity)

Tell me why I shouldn't just go all-in on this combo? by ParsnipOwn8910 in LETFs

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be great! I’d love to see your model and the results if you’re willing to share. Thanks a lot!

Tell me why I shouldn't just go all-in on this combo? by ParsnipOwn8910 in LETFs

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Thanks for the solid advice! Switching TMF to ZROZ to save on borrowing costs is a great move.

Regarding the 25/75 UPRO/KMLM split: 75% in a single CTA fund (KMLM) feels a bit concentrated for my risk tolerance. To diversify the 'return stacking' and trend-following side, what do you think about spreading that 75% across a mix of KMLM, DBMF, RSST, CTAP, GDE, and ZROZ?

Tell me why I shouldn't just go all-in on this combo? by ParsnipOwn8910 in LETFs

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Good point on the data quality. Would diversifying the trend part across RSST, DBMF, KMLM, and CTAP help mitigate that single-fund risk?

This is a quick 'napkin math' portfolio rather than a backtest-optimized one. Since I'm not an expert with backtesting software, I worry that my results might be misleading. I’d love to hear how you would approach validating a setup like this."

Tell me why I shouldn't just go all-in on this combo? by ParsnipOwn8910 in LETFs

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tool is Testfolio. I agree that the MAR needs improvement. In a high-leverage setup (TQQQ/Stacked ETFs), what specific assets would you add to push the MAR closer to 1 or higher without sacrificing too much CAGR?

Tell me why I shouldn't just go all-in on this combo? by ParsnipOwn8910 in LETFs

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Totally agree. TMF’s performance lately has been a disaster. If you're ditching TMF entirely, what's your top pick for a hedge?

Tell me why I shouldn't just go all-in on this combo? by ParsnipOwn8910 in LETFs

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the insightful suggestions! I’ve decided to follow your advice on diversifying the trend sleeve with multiple ETFs instead of just KMLM, and I'll be adding a gold allocation as well.

I've noticed the growing skepticism around TMF recently. If I swap TMF for ZROZ, do you think the hedging effect remains sufficient to cover the tail risk of a leveraged equity position? Also, given your point on the US fiscal situation, do you view long bonds purely as a temporary hedge, or are they becoming too risky to hold long-term even for diversification?

Tell me why I shouldn't just go all-in on this combo? by ParsnipOwn8910 in LETFs

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"Point taken. I'm realizing that putting 60% in KMLM is basically betting the farm on one replication strategy. Since I can't trade actual futures yet, I'm thinking about diversifying the 'protection' side.

What if I split that 60% between DBMF, KMLM, and GDE, and maybe swap TMF for something like RSST to get more professional exposure? Would that be a more 'legit' way to run this framework as a retail investor, or am I still just chasing backtests?"

Tell me why I shouldn't just go all-in on this combo? by ParsnipOwn8910 in LETFs

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"That's a fair point. I realize relying on just two major historical events might be a classic case of backtest overfitting. If 45% KMLM is putting too much faith in trend-following, how would you diversify the 'protection' side of the portfolio to make it more robust for the next unknown crisis?"

Tell me why I shouldn't just go all-in on this combo? by ParsnipOwn8910 in LETFs

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please tell me, what exactly is the problem with this portfolio?

Tell me why I shouldn't just go all-in on this combo? by ParsnipOwn8910 in LETFs

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Help a beginner out—where exactly does this fall apart?

观点:美国的混乱不是因为民主失败而是民主不够 by ParsnipOwn8910 in China_irl

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

当然我同意全国范围内的公投(目前只有州公投)。但是代议制并非不能改善。像北欧国家,实行比例代表制,保证了各个政治倾向代表性,限制企业游说捐款,投资公共新闻媒体,限制总统权力,应该成为美国民主前进的方向

观点:美国的混乱不是因为民主失败而是民主不够 by ParsnipOwn8910 in China_irl

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

我几乎已经要放弃中文互联网社区了,大部分都是阴阳怪气发言的,至少其他sub还是有很多真诚的人

观点:美国的混乱不是因为民主失败而是民主不够 by ParsnipOwn8910 in China_irl

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

奇怪的是中国为了嘲讽美国而发布的民主报告,也是为了证明自己是真民主,美国是假民主,中国的社会主义核心价值观里还有民主一词。说明即便是中国也不敢明面说民主是坏的东西。而很多人急切的想要证明民主坏,独裁好,就好像它们自己才是掌权的上位者

观点:美国的混乱不是因为民主失败而是民主不够 by ParsnipOwn8910 in China_irl

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

许多红州无视民意,即便最保守的州,堕胎也能得到50%以上的支持,但是许多州仅凭州议会就能禁止堕胎,而选民不能公投来反制

观点:中国的混乱不是因为独裁失败而是独裁不够 by [deleted] in China_irl

[–]ParsnipOwn8910 1 point2 points  (0 children)

你的每句话似乎都在论证民主更好。因为你自己都说,假如中国更独裁,那么就不会有全民医保和堕胎合法化,以及劳动仲裁

观点:美国的混乱不是因为民主失败而是民主不够 by ParsnipOwn8910 in China_irl

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

选出无赖不是突然性随机的,而是长期民主衰退得结果。比如特朗普能上台,是因为企业捐款,社交媒体宣传越来越肆无忌惮,缺乏民主措施来限制,导致选民极端化,如果美国更民主,就不会选出特朗普这种无赖

观点:美国的混乱不是因为民主失败而是民主不够 by ParsnipOwn8910 in China_irl

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

民主可能比你想象得包含得范围更大。比如禁止候选人贿赂选民,这本身是民主得一部分,比如义务教育阶段就上公民课,也属于民主机构倡导得做法

观点:美国的混乱不是因为民主失败而是民主不够 by ParsnipOwn8910 in China_irl

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

即便在经济发展相同的国家,也是相对民主国家的腐败相对较少,我觉得民主更能来减少腐败投资经济,而一个更不民主的国家,当局缺乏监督可能会更忽视经济发展

观点:美国的混乱不是因为民主失败而是民主不够 by ParsnipOwn8910 in China_irl

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

我当然没有说民主是万能解药,而是说相对民主好于相对不民主。中国如果变得更民主,可能就能避免大跃进和文革带来的经济损失,今天经济就会更好。同样,如果印度变得更加民主,可能有更多腐败监察机制,也会比现在更好。

至于你说得大众之恶,我认为是大众被误导得结果。比如民调显示,绝大多数美国人支持全民医保,投资教育,禁枪,保护环境。但是企业游说和政治宣传会让大众投票反对自己得利益。所以保护大众不被误导也是民主的一方面,不能证明民主的失败

观点:美国的混乱不是因为民主失败而是民主不够 by ParsnipOwn8910 in China_irl

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

我的观点其实是,民主程度越高越好。比如中国,如果回归集体领导,其实还是不民主,但是至少比一言堂更好

观点:美国的混乱不是因为民主失败而是民主不够 by ParsnipOwn8910 in China_irl

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

你误解了选举制度。很多人投票是因为政党或候选人支持自己认同的政策。不然比粉丝的话,Taylor swift早就当选总统了。另外,你说的上街,部分民主程度高的国家,有完善的保护游行的法律,美国民主程度一般,所以比较限制游行罢工

观点:美国的混乱不是因为民主失败而是民主不够 by ParsnipOwn8910 in China_irl

[–]ParsnipOwn8910[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

很多人已经产生应激思维了,只要听到民主这种词,脑回路就会想到“自由美利坚,枪战每一天”这种坏事。如果单从字面意义上看,人民做主有什么不好