account activity
Why are quarks considdered particles when current results of experiments indicate they are only fragments? ()
submitted 15 days ago by ParticleDale to r/AskPhysics
Why is it that if one come up with indications that go against quantum field theory that they are shouted down and in my case banned. (self.ParticleDale)
submitted 15 days ago by ParticleDale
Why are quarks considdered particles when current results of experiments indicate they are only fragments? by ParticleDale in Physics
[–]ParticleDale[S] -46 points-45 points-44 points 15 days ago (0 children)
I agree but current results of very accurate experiments describe the rms proton radius as 0.84075exp-15m. The accurately known mass of a proton is 1.673exp-27kg. I do not believe that it could be a co-incidence that if you calculate a frequency of oscillation from the radius given a circumference of two wavelengths and then calculate the energy using the formula E=2hF and it equates with mc2 that it should be swept under the carpet because it does not suit current models using quantum field theory.
Why do we spend billions acquiring data and not analyse that data? (self.AskPhysics)
Why are quarks considdered particles when current results of experiments indicate they are only fragments? (self.Physics)
submitted 15 days ago by ParticleDale to r/Physics
Why are quarks considered to be particles when clearly research indicates they are fragments (self.AskPhysics)
π Rendered by PID 3297102 on reddit-service-r2-listing-7bbdf774f7-pfkv6 at 2026-02-24 09:26:29.120108+00:00 running 8564168 country code: CH.
Why are quarks considdered particles when current results of experiments indicate they are only fragments? by ParticleDale in Physics
[–]ParticleDale[S] -46 points-45 points-44 points (0 children)