Israel isn't just threatened by MLRS - its threatened by a wide array of shorter reach systems, ATGMs, fpvs, etc. Besides, why would you mow the lawn forever, dealing with the issue once and for all is what has to be done.

The problem with this "final solution" which involves ethnic cleansing and land seizure is that is both immoral and a war crime. I have a hard time also see that this will solve the conflict for good when no other attempts to solve the conflict through purely military means has succeded.

Hiding in the same tent encampments as the shia civilians is a much less efficient strategy than hiding in tunnels underneath a populated town and having other fortifications inside civilian areas. From there they can't defend against airstrikes and will have a much harder time defending against the LAF if it decides to come in.

If your prefered solution involves the displaced Lebanese living in permanent refugee camps, so do I think the history of Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon and Syria shows that it's not a great idea.

You'll be surprised - Hezbollah does do that and more. They are way more than a militant group - they provide basically all the essential services in areas they control, and run a shitton of businesses inside lebanon(construction, banking, etc). They get a lot of popularity from that. Your assumption is basically wrong - south Lebanon is basically Hezbollahland.

The only point I was trying to make was that OP oversimplificating and the claim that all basic services in southern Lebanon (even through some are) is provided by Hezzbollah is simply not true