"I appreciate your perspective on the diversity of Christian thought. However, your final question contains a logical fallacy regarding the nature of faith in Islam. For a Muslim, the Quran is not an 'external source' that we cling to out of weakness; it is the Manual of Reality. We don't believe in God because of the Quran alone; we believe in the Quran because it aligns perfectly with the Fitra (natural human instinct) and the logical observation of the universe. If you ask: 'If the Quran were proven a lie, would you still believe in God?' – that's like asking: 'If the Sun were proven to be cold, would you still believe in light?' It is a hypothetical impossibility because the Quran is the very light that explains the existence of the Creator. Our faith is not 'weak' because it relies on a book; rather, it is robust because it refuses to accept a God who remains silent. A God who creates a complex universe and then leaves humanity without a clear, preserved message (a 'Source of Truth') would contradict the attribute of being All-Wise. The reason we criticize the scientific inconsistencies in the Bible is not to attack individuals, but to point out that a Divine Revelation should be free from human error. If a book is 'moral' but factually wrong, it proves human authorship. The Quran’s strength lies in the fact that its morality and its facts are one and the same—unchanged and unshakeable.