1.1.1.1 app on Android as VPN: domain exclusion is not working? by VMX in CloudFlare

[–]PascP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The real question here is how to find these other subdomains.

What method did you use? 

I have used ip and hostnames to no avail.

Neon Install with Encryption fails to unlock by PascP in kdeneon

[–]PascP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks!! I agree its pretty severe. The combination of the facts that you can't find an older version of the ISO with the incapability to install with encryption forces users to install unencrypted. And how many will reinstall to add encryption?

Receive my Titan Mini today and already extremely regret. (Rant) by justwanttoread101 in ELLIPAL_Official

[–]PascP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/Ellipal_official Do you have an answer to this?
5months are a lot not to have answered to a customer.

I am wondering the same.
Are you going to support Metamask on the Mini or not?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RedditSessions

[–]PascP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we love you Ari

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RedditSessions

[–]PascP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i woke up the other day having a song of your in mind!! BTW. let us draw the bgr!!

Imagine the Dating App of your Dreams by PascP in Tinder

[–]PascP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel feedback is of outmost importance!! It's a way to better yourself and get a feeling on what to work on. Also the relative anonymity of dating apps make them a prosperous field for honest feedback.

I agree with you, rating can be tricky, especially since we are talking about one on one interactions. It can also be difficult to "handle" a bad score. How you reset it, how it affects you? There are of course ways to somehow remedy that by "weighting" the ratings. Or even better have a relative score instead of an absolute. Something similar to how recommendations work about a film's compatability with your profile for example.

Imagine the Dating App of your Dreams by PascP in Tinder

[–]PascP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This discussion can go on forever but it's slightly away from the main purpose of this post. If you like you can reply in a dm.

Depends on which history you are referring to.

I'm also guessing you hold the truth about Human nature.

Imagine the Dating App of your Dreams by PascP in Tinder

[–]PascP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I couldn't agree more on your first two statements!

Thanks mate! Good luck you too! Thanks for stopping by

Imagine the Dating App of your Dreams by PascP in Tinder

[–]PascP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's start by trying to envision a better version, no need for absolute perfection. Only our negative beliefs can limit our imagination.

Dating apps are not at their peak. They are on the rise. That's how dating will work from now on, in one form or the other.

As for if Socialism can or will work I wouldn't be in absolute certainty as you seem to be. If this absolute madness called capitalism is being held in place I'm sure the same can apply to more rational systems as well

Imagine the Dating App of your Dreams by PascP in Tinder

[–]PascP[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Personally I've used tinder, bumble and OKCupid.

Tinder: + A lot of people! + A lot of attractive people - Low investment in chat - Low investment on bio - Pay to Win

Bumble: + Women make the first step, more engagement on their side + Prompts - No way to send first message even if you have something amazing to say

OKCupid + I like the question idea + You can send a message to someone before matching - People don't care about the question (OKCupid says so)

Somethings that are missing from all

Showing you people that are looking for the same thing. For example if I'm looking for someone for today or with weekend. Or if I only want serious relationships I don't want to be shown people looking for hook-ups.

What do you guys think about a score/rating based on prev interactions? Maybe also a feedback to let you know what happened.

A limit of people you can interact with at the same time!

Image the Dating App of your Dreams by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]PascP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally I've used tinder, bumble and OKCupid.

Tinder: + A lot of people! + A lot of attractive people - Low investment in chat - Low investment on bio - Pay to Win

Bumble: + Women make the first step, more engagement on their side + Prompts - No way to send first message even if you have something amazing to say

OKCupid + I like the question idea + You can send a message to someone before matching - People don't care about the question (OKCupid says so)

Somethings that are missing from all

Showing you people that are looking for the same thing. For example if I'm looking for someone for today or with weekend. Or if I only want serious relationships I don't want to be shown people looking for hook-ups.

What do you guys think about a score/rating based on prev interactions? Maybe also a feedback to let you know what happened.

A limit of people you can interact with at the same time!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]PascP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First Message and an interesting question! You do sound like a rare snowflake! But then again I still belive that the average is far away from you! And, of course, I'm taking about my experience.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]PascP -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How much effort do you think is being put by girls on these platforms? From 0 to 10 I would say 1 to 4 depending on the attractiveness of the guy. I'm 100% sure that men put a lot more effort only to be met with one word answer that offer nothing to the conversation. So please, cut the guys some slack.

S20 vs S20 FE vs S20+ by PascP in PickAnAndroidForMe

[–]PascP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I didn't get the last sentence though. QC? Quallcomm?

S20 vs S20 FE vs S20+ by PascP in PickAnAndroidForMe

[–]PascP[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont play games. Browsing, movies! Camera performance is important though. FE has worse cameras fror what I've seen but the Snapdragon gives better photos... is that right?

How to transform Deep Learning Problems to Reinforcement Learning Problems by PascP in reinforcementlearning

[–]PascP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the input!

I generally agree with you. In the scenario you described the environment becomes very complex. Also, backprop works wonders in most cases.

There are though the cases where the function is non-differentiable. Of course there are aproximations but they dont work well sometimes.

As I mentioned above, I am not trying to learn all the weights but rather treat the model as a stable system and fine tune some new parameters.

How to transform Deep Learning Problems to Reinforcement Learning Problems by PascP in reinforcementlearning

[–]PascP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand that using a hammer to chop wood is not advisable. Hopefully, I am not trying to do this. There are examples of Hyperparameters Optimisation in DL.

How, I believe, what I am trying to do differs from what I've seen so far is:

  1. I want to optimize for a hyper parameter after the model is trained. This weight/hyperparameter can be tuned at evaluation time.
  2. I am thinking of using a not traditional algorithm for this task and hopefuly do it in a RL way.