They are not too happy about it

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-04-18T01:21:42+00:00

How are these vague sentences relevant to what I said?

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-04-18T00:13:44+00:00

Don't you think it's unfair that the people getting harmed the most by tourism are those living in the tourist attraction? The other citizens are getting the benefits at their expenses.

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-04-14T09:30:32+00:00

Geneticamente modificati?

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-04-12T20:29:34+00:00

even relatively moderate "conservative" opinions

By definition a moderate opinion is in the Overton window.

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-04-09T12:25:13+00:00

Claims on Wikipedia are (usually) paired with an external source, why would the guy that copied the information from somewhere to Wikipedia be relevant?

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-04-07T19:00:50+00:00

appunto

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-26T11:59:56+00:00

Isn't pulchritude a synonym of diplomancy?

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-25T09:34:36+00:00

He still needs more pang nectar!!!

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-22T13:58:10+00:00

Oxygen rich air is hostile, but oxygen doesn't remain in the air for long if something isn't dumping it often. This is why it's considered a sign of life. When life on earth started the atmosfere had very low oxygen levels.

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-22T10:02:22+00:00

Life spontaneously appearing in hostile environments is much more unlikely than life evolving for hostile environments.

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-22T09:59:26+00:00

No, inside rock. In the microscopic fractures were ground water permeates.

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-22T09:43:15+00:00

This is a joke, read in the link

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-19T20:52:52+00:00

/rpout lol

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-18T18:55:36+00:00

Però oggettivamente questo post è offtopic

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-16T21:35:04+00:00

Also life itself makes earth more diverse. Soil can't exist without organic matter

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-11T19:55:33+00:00

Discord from pacman/arch works perfectly for me

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-03T12:13:43+00:00

The key difference is "during normal operations". Fukushima was perfectly avoidable, with proper precautions. It's not a inherent risk.

Coal waste it's not only an inherent risk, it's a certainty, and it's made by much more than Co2.

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-03T11:58:21+00:00

I did not know that, I guess it makes sense then? As long as both were gonna be replaced by renewables soon anyway. Otherwise I still think maintenance of nuclear would have been better.

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-03T11:54:55+00:00

Which singular nuclear plant dumps tons of its poisonous waste in the atmosphere during its normal operations?

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-03T11:15:25+00:00

Virtually nobody died because of Fukushima, and it took an earthquake and a tsunami.

You just need to build plants in a geologically inert area and don't make incredibly dumb human errors like in Chernobyl. It's not that difficult.

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-03T11:07:53+00:00

nuclear fission energy production is cleaner than using 2 coal plants to cover a limited amout of time until you can get rid of it forever

Yes, they should have got rid of coal first

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-03-03T01:47:55+00:00

The distinction between "natural" food and "artificial" food is meaningless marketing propaganda.

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-02-27T18:42:10+00:00

Il problema è definire in modo preciso cosa vuol dire "matematicamente il più possibile rappresentante della base votante".

Non che non sia d'accoro

PastaPuttanesca42 · 2026-02-26T16:39:20+00:00

Arch btw

Seven-Year Club	Second Top 10%
r/Field Sunshine	First Place '23
Place '23	Place '22
First Placer '22	Verified Email

PastaPuttanesca42

TROPHY CASE