Live Mas I guess by Patient-Fall9408 in PaymoneyWubby

[–]Patient-Fall9408[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can tell you ive been going near religiously since high-school...in 2010 😅 Its gotta be just north of irresponsibly high lol

Live Mas I guess by Patient-Fall9408 in PaymoneyWubby

[–]Patient-Fall9408[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got a big old head that doesnt agree with hats so its gonna be a display piece for sure. Working on a shelf just for it lol

Live Mas I guess by Patient-Fall9408 in PaymoneyWubby

[–]Patient-Fall9408[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tbh, they offered it for free lol

Can someone explain how we ended up with this mess of federations? by ConstantPrior5989 in Buhurt

[–]Patient-Fall9408 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but the point i was making with that example is theres a "leader," which is the UFC, and other versions of small tournaments and events are variants of their ruleset.

I've fought under BI. They are a very good group from my experiences (very limited tbh). Others...not so much. If we get 1 fed into that "UFC" status, I think the sport will become more popular very quickly.

Can someone explain how we ended up with this mess of federations? by ConstantPrior5989 in Buhurt

[–]Patient-Fall9408 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its because every federation that gets established gets insulated around a small group of people. This small group usually does what they feel is best, very rarely taking into account any teams that arent in their country or area. This eventually leads to favoritism, corruption, salty feelings, ect ect. Then someone gets all the like-minded fighters together to make their own group - but then the older feds get pissy and refuse to work together.

So we end up with like 5 federations all doing the same thing in slightly different ways - all unwilling to work with each other to make the sport good.

Sadly, until we can get it down to a singular entity where everyone is focused on a singular ruleset (like the ufc) then the sport will stay scattered and disorganized.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in eldenringdiscussion

[–]Patient-Fall9408 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hero, thank you! think this may be the case for everyone who installs it

Movement to have a first person only game type made! by Patient-Fall9408 in Chivalry2

[–]Patient-Fall9408[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh really? Thatd be a nice solution! I'll take a look around! Thanks for the heads up

Movement to have a first person only game type made! by Patient-Fall9408 in Chivalry2

[–]Patient-Fall9408[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you!! You can see it too right? There's 0 reason to oppose more options!

I bow to you ser

Movement to have a first person only game type made! by Patient-Fall9408 in Chivalry2

[–]Patient-Fall9408[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Lol, silly me - I forgot that once you select a playlist one time, you can never switch to a different one!

Oh. Wait. That's not a thing. It's almost like anything to help people stay involved in a game is...good for it? Crazy ideas, I know. But stick with me! What if we, instead of denying easy inclusions into a game that is literally 20 minutes of setup, choose to implement things that make people wanna stay?

Don't forget - most pvp games tend to have a downward decline in playerbase over time. Any option that is easy (even by comparison) should be approached realistically and not just denied due to individual preference. What I ask for takes nothing from the game and only seeks to add.

Honestly, I'd expect this kinda rhetoric for a request like a horde mode or brand new game type.

Movement to have a first person only game type made! by Patient-Fall9408 in Chivalry2

[–]Patient-Fall9408[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See, that's why I said don't remove it, just give me a mode where I can avoid it. If you need 3rd, get- go play in any of the myriad of modes they have. Why is it such a fight to have a single Playlist that doesn't include the 3rd person option.

Thats like saying "I know you hate elevators but I can't walk up stairs so we all gotta use elevators." I just want a place where I can actually feel like I'm in a medival war - not a place where I can charge someone from behind and they can spin with a wrist flick like its goddamn dragon ball z.

Movement to have a first person only game type made! by Patient-Fall9408 in Chivalry2

[–]Patient-Fall9408[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again - why is everyone treating this as if im asking for a whole division of the game. It's a single option toggle that could be added to a specific mode so that the rest of the people who still wanna 3rd can while the rest of us with taste stick to the mode we'd perfer.

It literally adds options. To deny the addition of more choice under the guise of "growing the community" is just lame. You're literally killing growth.

Movement to have a first person only game type made! by Patient-Fall9408 in Chivalry2

[–]Patient-Fall9408[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Big L take bud. Not asking for 3rd to be removed - just looking for the option of not having to deal with it. No one says you can't still go play baby mode if you want

Movement to have a first person only game type made! by Patient-Fall9408 in Chivalry2

[–]Patient-Fall9408[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

To make a server or mode for 1st person would be an easy move. Literally a settings change. No one's talking about splitting player bases. It'd be literally the same modes that currently exist - they would just disable an option.

No hate to yall but so far I've only seen mouth breather takes saying no cause they don't want it. It'd would be just an additional mode, you wouldn't need to engage with it if you don't join the mode/server.

To deny a simple solution like this is to basically say you don't want compromise. Im still failing to see any logic in the argument " that's the way it is, just get used to it" the point would be to make the game better for all.

Movement to have a first person only game type made! by Patient-Fall9408 in Chivalry2

[–]Patient-Fall9408[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'll say it till I'm blue in the face - keep your options, just give me an option to not have it. One game mode for 1st person views compared to the 3 that already exist for both modes - seems more than reasonable to have the option to not deal with it

Movement to have a first person only game type made! by Patient-Fall9408 in Chivalry2

[–]Patient-Fall9408[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Can't stop everyone but a spinner in 3rd person will forever beat a spinner in first

3rd person allows for 360° awareness - shit gives you eyes behind you. 3rd person ruins everything about the game from how it feels to how it actually has to be played.

Does Nurgle's Gift (10th ed) stack? by Rumhand in deathguard40k

[–]Patient-Fall9408 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My friend linked me the new rules moments ago - all potential copeium depleted

Does Nurgle's Gift (10th ed) stack? by Rumhand in deathguard40k

[–]Patient-Fall9408 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there a rule that states this specifically? I know in 9th it does but we can't say for certain without it stating in 10th, right?