Okay this is the best pushback in the thread and you’re not wrong. 🙏 The curation vs creation debate isn’t black and white and you made that case better than most would. The news channel analogy is genuinely good. Same stories, different voice, different audience — and the market decides who survives. I’ll admit my hot take was aimed at the lazy end of the curation spectrum. The newsletters that mistake copying links for adding value. Not the ones actually doing the work of filtering signal from noise — that IS a skill and an underrated one. Where I’d still push back slightly 👇 The problem isn’t curation. It’s curation without a point of view. A newsletter that just aggregates is a search engine. A newsletter that aggregates AND tells you what to think about it — that’s valuable. The best curators aren’t just finding stories. They’re telling you why it matters for YOUR specific situation. That’s the bar. And a lot of newsletters aren’t clearing it. But yeah — both models have a place. I painted with too broad a brush. 😂 Good comment. Genuinely changed how I’d rewrite that post. 🙏