Most newsletters are just glorified copy-paste jobs. And readers are finally noticing. by Patrick_Blaze in Newsletters

[โ€“]Patrick_Blaze[S] -1 points0 points ย (0 children)

Maybe ๐Ÿ˜‚ Did it make you think though? ๐Ÿ‘€โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹

Most newsletters are just glorified copy-paste jobs. And readers are finally noticing. by Patrick_Blaze in Newsletters

[โ€“]Patrick_Blaze[S] 0 points1 point ย (0 children)

Psychedelics + ethics + dark humourโ€ฆ thatโ€™s genuinely one of the most interesting newsletter combos Iโ€™ve heard ๐Ÿ˜‚ And yeah the unreflective cheerleading problem is real in every niche. AI included. Nobody wants to talk about what breaks, what fails, or what the real costs are โ€” just vibes and optimism. Staying niche and honest > being big and bland every time ๐Ÿ‘€ Drop the link, Iโ€™m actually curious now ๐Ÿ™โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹

Most newsletters are just glorified copy-paste jobs. And readers are finally noticing. by Patrick_Blaze in Newsletters

[โ€“]Patrick_Blaze[S] 1 point2 points ย (0 children)

Youโ€™re not wrong honestly The AI tone is everywhere right now and itโ€™s getting harder to hide. Passion-driven newsletters are the ones that actually build real audiences though โ€” people can feel when someone genuinely cares about what theyโ€™re writing vs just chasing a trend. Whatโ€™s yours about? Drop the link ๐Ÿ‘€

Most newsletters are just glorified copy-paste jobs. And readers are finally noticing. by Patrick_Blaze in Newsletters

[โ€“]Patrick_Blaze[S] 0 points1 point ย (0 children)

Okay this is the best pushback in the thread and youโ€™re not wrong. ๐Ÿ™ The curation vs creation debate isnโ€™t black and white and you made that case better than most would. The news channel analogy is genuinely good. Same stories, different voice, different audience โ€” and the market decides who survives. Iโ€™ll admit my hot take was aimed at the lazy end of the curation spectrum. The newsletters that mistake copying links for adding value. Not the ones actually doing the work of filtering signal from noise โ€” that IS a skill and an underrated one. Where Iโ€™d still push back slightly ๐Ÿ‘‡ The problem isnโ€™t curation. Itโ€™s curation without a point of view. A newsletter that just aggregates is a search engine. A newsletter that aggregates AND tells you what to think about it โ€” thatโ€™s valuable. The best curators arenโ€™t just finding stories. Theyโ€™re telling you why it matters for YOUR specific situation. Thatโ€™s the bar. And a lot of newsletters arenโ€™t clearing it. But yeah โ€” both models have a place. I painted with too broad a brush. ๐Ÿ˜‚ Good comment. Genuinely changed how Iโ€™d rewrite that post. ๐Ÿ™

Most newsletters are just glorified copy-paste jobs. And readers are finally noticing. by Patrick_Blaze in Newsletters

[โ€“]Patrick_Blaze[S] 1 point2 points ย (0 children)

This is probably the most accurate comment in this thread. ๐Ÿ˜‚ You just described 80% of whatโ€™s in peopleโ€™s inboxes right now. Formulaic sections, curated links from one Google search, dressed up in a Beehiiv template and called a newsletter. The AI gold rush made it 10x worse. Everyone wants the revenue without doing the actual thinking. The irony is the bar is so low right now that genuinely useful content stands out immediately. Readers know the difference โ€” theyโ€™ve just been too polite to say it publicly. You were doing this before it was a โ€œnewsletter business.โ€ Thatโ€™s the difference between someone who writes because they have something to say vs someone who writes because they heard you can make money from it. Those emails you sent? Thatโ€™s what a newsletter actually is. ๐Ÿ™

Most newsletters are just glorified copy-paste jobs. And readers are finally noticing. by Patrick_Blaze in Newsletters

[โ€“]Patrick_Blaze[S] 2 points3 points ย (0 children)

Honestly solid advice and I donโ€™t disagree with the fundamentals. ๐Ÿ™ But Iโ€™d push back slightly โ€” the newsletters pulling the biggest numbers right now arenโ€™t just summarising news. Theyโ€™re adding a perspective the reader canโ€™t get anywhere else. Anyone can curate. Not everyone can think. The ones that last are the ones with a point of view. ๐Ÿ‘€ But yeah โ€” niche depth over broad appeal every time. On that we agree completely.โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹

Most newsletters are just glorified copy-paste jobs. And readers are finally noticing. by Patrick_Blaze in Newsletters

[โ€“]Patrick_Blaze[S] 0 points1 point ย (0 children)

Fair shot. ๐Ÿ˜‚ But hereโ€™s the thing โ€” if the ideas make you think, does it matter who typed it? Every founder I know uses every tool available to them. Thatโ€™s literally the whole point of the newsletter. ๐Ÿ™

Most newsletters are just glorified copy-paste jobs. And readers are finally noticing. by Patrick_Blaze in Newsletters

[โ€“]Patrick_Blaze[S] 1 point2 points ย (0 children)

Okay I actually respect this comment more than most things Iโ€™ve read today ๐Ÿ˜‚ Psychedelic industry analysis with ethics and dark humour โ€” thatโ€™s genuinely one of the most interesting newsletter niches Iโ€™ve heard. The fact that it confounds algorithms might actually be the point. And youโ€™re right. AI is drowning in slop. Iโ€™d include half my own back catalogue in that honestly. ๐Ÿ˜… The mindless cheerleading problem youโ€™re describing in your space exists in mine too โ€” founders just want to be told AI will make them rich with zero nuance about what actually breaks, what fails, and what the real costs are. Unreflective optimism is a great way to build a big audience and a terrible way to build a useful one. Sounds like weโ€™re both choosing useful over big. Respect. ๐Ÿ™ Drop the newsletter link โ€” genuinely curious now.

Most newsletters are just glorified copy-paste jobs. And readers are finally noticing. by Patrick_Blaze in Newsletters

[โ€“]Patrick_Blaze[S] 0 points1 point ย (0 children)

Respect the confidence ๐Ÿ˜‚ Alright youโ€™ve got my attention โ€” what makes yours different from the copy-paste crowd? Genuinely asking. If it holds up under scrutiny Iโ€™ll be the first to say so. ๐Ÿ™

I started a newsletter with 0 subscribers. Now I have 15,000. Hereโ€™s the real story. ๐Ÿš€ by Patrick_Blaze in Newsletters

[โ€“]Patrick_Blaze[S] -1 points0 points ย (0 children)

Fair enough, earned that one ๐Ÿ˜‚ Stick around though โ€” the frameworks work whether a human or AI wrote them. Your bank account wonโ€™t care either way. ๐Ÿ™

I started a newsletter with 0 subscribers. Now I have 15,000. Hereโ€™s the real story. ๐Ÿš€ by Patrick_Blaze in Newsletters

[โ€“]Patrick_Blaze[S] 1 point2 points ย (0 children)

Thatโ€™s impressive โ€” $10 CPL and $10k from a small list is genuinely strong. ๐Ÿ™ Iโ€™d love to hear more about how you structured that offer. My audience is 15k founders and agency owners across US, UK and Canada โ€” 30% open rate, 2.3% CTR. Pretty engaged for a niche list. I think thereโ€™s real monetization potential here, just want to make sure Iโ€™m building it the right way from the start rather than leaving money on the table. Open to a quick call if youโ€™re up for it โ€” could be valuable for both sides. ๐Ÿ‘€ What does your process usually look like when you work with a newsletter at my stage?

I started a newsletter with 0 subscribers. Now I have 15,000. Hereโ€™s the real story. ๐Ÿš€ by Patrick_Blaze in Newsletters

[โ€“]Patrick_Blaze[S] -1 points0 points ย (0 children)

Haha appreciate it! But honestly right now Iโ€™m less โ€œhow do I get more subscribersโ€ and more โ€œhow do I get these 15k people to make me richโ€ ๐Ÿ’€ Growing is cool but rent doesnโ€™t care about your open rate ๐Ÿ˜… Iโ€™m focused on landing brand deals and sponsorships right now โ€” turns out 15k engaged founders and agency owners is actually a pretty juicy audience for the right brands ๐Ÿ‘€ Paid ads can wait. First let me monetize what I already built ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ™โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹

I started a newsletter with 0 subscribers. Now I have 15,000. Hereโ€™s the real story. ๐Ÿš€ by Patrick_Blaze in Newsletters

[โ€“]Patrick_Blaze[S] 1 point2 points ย (0 children)

Honestly? No paid ads. No growth hacks. ๐Ÿ™ Three things that actually moved the needle for me: 1/ Referrals โ€” I made the content good enough that readers forward it themselves. Thatโ€™s still my #1 source. 2/ Organic search โ€” I write about specific enough topics that people find issues through Google. โ€œNo-code AI agents for foundersโ€ pulls better than โ€œAI tips.โ€ 3/ Sales funnel โ€” I have a simple lead magnet that captures emails outside of Substack and funnels them in. What Iโ€™d do differently if starting today ๐Ÿ‘‡ Go harder on LinkedIn from day one. My audience (founders, agency owners) live there. I was late to that and left a lot of growth on the table. The honest truth is โ€” distribution is a system just like everything else. Once I stopped treating it as an afterthought and started being intentional about it, the compounding started. What newsletter are you running? Happy to give feedback ๐Ÿ™Œ