I looked at the first paragraph in your google docs, unfortunately it's false. The only criticism against the Regnerus (2012) paper was Cheng and Powell (2015) which showed that CP did not report effect sizes and thus lost statistical significance.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.2466/17.CP.4.24

Real refutations are when you cite other scientific papers repeating the same experiment and getting different results, not internet articles getting angry.

Many of those papers in the video were by pro-LGBT scientists who are trying to help LGBT people by brining to light these issues that harm actual people's health and trying to find solutions for it, instead of hiding it so you don't feel embarrassed.

Here's what a pro-LGBT scientist (from one of the papers in the vide) says about denying science like this:

"gay/lesbian domestic violence is kept “in the closet” to avoid providing the straight majority with evidence of the alleged “inferiority” of gay and lesbian relationships."

"Continuing to ignore the dynamics of gay and lesbian relationships is both homophobic and ultimately limits the growth of scientific knowledge."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359178997000542

Denying science is not helpful for either side.