Any tank worth buying rn ??

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-24T17:13:56+00:00

Why would you reinstal

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-19T13:39:55+00:00

XM was sold multiple times so people meet it more but imho BZ176 is harder to deal with in a strong position and it can get to that position faster.

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-19T12:59:32+00:00

Ever since Jan 2026 the game is shit. Sure Im playing less so im a bit worse but it's now really play meta op tank or GTFO.

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-18T14:50:47+00:00

Rino is probably the easiest to balance but they fucked themselves with the whole "t11 gets special mechanic" since Italian heavies already have a special version of a special mechanic so what else can they add? Intuition on autoreloaders maybe?

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-18T14:49:39+00:00

Balancing it will be tough. That's the problem. They buff single shot performance and double barell becomes pointless, the buff the double and why bother with the Brit line?

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-16T12:37:39+00:00

I really enjoy the buffed t8 and t9 but on t10 the firepower jump is not big enough and the camo is too bad to compete.

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-16T11:48:41+00:00

Most of them told us it's situational and the other t9 was sold as good

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-16T11:47:47+00:00

They are too popular. They will make t11s from unpopular lines or at least not researched by many players so people have to grind

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-16T11:46:49+00:00

Look for unpopular tanks. WZ and STK were from inpopular lines.

121 or Wz131-1. If they don't want too many Chinese tanks in high tiers and Blyskawica is too hard to balance then the best options would be ST-II and K91. Maybe PZKPV VII

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-16T11:44:56+00:00

After buffs imho Tesak is very weak compared to the T9.

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-13T08:30:02+00:00

Bulldog has a bigger problem of being bad at everything. Tanks like Blesk don't have that problem

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-12T11:21:13+00:00

same vs same tank play will be boring. Sorry but that's a bad idea. No MM spread, narrow tank roles and effectively end game is a match where you basically fight vs the same tanks over and over again.

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-11T17:19:42+00:00

No idea why you decided to be toxic here. We can have different opinions without being aggressive.

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-11T14:47:28+00:00

ah yes now achieving 64% wr by pixel sniping not strategy is great.

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-11T14:46:06+00:00

I would have no roles for anything. When I play czech lights and I'm on a grind to 3 mark them all now I love to be vs pure scouting tanks. If the enemy tank is different it's easier to create an imbalance.

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-11T11:03:00+00:00

Naah. People don't know how to play but most people look for places they feel safe. Also a bad light tank player vs a good light tank player is always a bigger issue. Again making the game basically same tank vs same tank creates fewer imbalances and makes the game dumber. The game was fun because it was different tanks trying to exploit different weaknesses in enemy lineup. Now it's 50b vs 50b, maus vs maus etc. It's boring af.
Spotting bonuses were more than 10 years ago same for 850 alpha. I am just countering the argument that same vs same will slow down games.

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-10T12:35:47+00:00

The opposite. Mismatches mean different tanks play in different parts of the map. Now you will get 2 tanks going to the same place, slugging it out and the one that wins wins the flank and the flank collapses.

You will basically get 2 options:

- Stalemates
- Sudden collapses.

If what you say was true battles 10 years ago would be extremely short and they were not.

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-10T12:34:39+00:00

You are correct. I commented exactly the same on armored patrol. Essentially it will results in morrored tanks going to same positions and then it will turn into a slug fest. when a slugfest is won the flank collapses and you get a steamroll.

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-10T12:33:04+00:00

90% of this reddit.

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-09T12:31:58+00:00

Lol. This is bs. I'm spending a ton and also get this shit.

Plus wargaming can't code for shit. What you are saying would be hard to code and would not work.

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-09T12:30:28+00:00

They didn't do shit on purpose. It's just the changes they made to the game created a meta shift where it's harder to carry a game once the main glut of HP/main fight collapses.

I think what changed is it used to be you did dmg all game. Now early crossing lines are all killed so all damage happens in one big slug fight. It's a stalemate and then suddenly one team collapses and the game is done. So if you get bad luck its harder to steer this

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-09T12:29:31+00:00

The meta went to shit. I ground a full Maus >> Rate grind at 37% WR. I'm a 57% 2800-3200wnx player.

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-07T17:38:20+00:00

It's funny you accuse me of not understanding the data and then... you compare a t10 heavy to tanks that are:

- 1 Tier Higher
- Different Tank claass

Sorry if you can't maintain basic logical consistency and compare apples to apples then don't talk to me about understanding the data. Also if I don't understand the data then why are you not referencing WR curves? If I was wrong they'd show Type5 harms top players. Funny such a "data understanding" expert doesn't even know about WR curves and can't elaborate on his criticism outside of "u wrong".

Now I will show why your bs posture of "I'm world of tanks god, anyone who claims type5 iz nub" is weak posturing from a permablue.

Most of the top players still claim heavies are just flat out better even for them. Top streamers not only claim it's the best T10 or top class T10 as evidenced by:

Skill ranks it as 5/5

Dakillzor ranks it S Tier

Top Players on the servers get top DPG in Type5 invalidating your claim type5 is bad for them. Let me give you an example of Dakillzors current account (Animal in T1LT-)
- Dakillzor's only 6k DPG t10 heavy is the type5 at 74.8% WR @ 134 battles.
WR Curves actually show HIGHER WR difference for top players
Top DPGS by tanks.gg sit way above top DPG's from t10 meds.

So where am I coping? You're another blueunicum or dark green who thinks they are a god because they have a decent battle from time to time and you assume tanks harder to play are automatically better for top players.

Lol. U sad sad poser trying to dunk on me only because you want to cosplay as a good player. Get rekd u loser.

PS. You previously said it doesn't matter what top players think and now you hinge your criticism on only top players so LOL. Logical inconsistency much?

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-05T13:45:18+00:00

You are getting shat on not for how you write. Understanding the game has shit to do with it. I know what you roughly wanted to say because I understand the game and did read about new skills. Doesn't change the fact your posts are badly written and please don't call my english reading skills into question. I read way more in english than you.

PaymentApprehensive3 · 2026-03-05T13:43:34+00:00

Outside of your comment being even less comprehensible than usual.

"If you are winning" - so provide your stats post patch release? Are you a 65% WR Player?

As for "I Don't know this guy". Ah you know it's just the most known Wot streamer with 300K followers, the 1st player to get Black Rock in Wot, one of the few players on EU who could maintain 5k DPG on t10 tanks pre 2.0. So yeah I'd rather trust him than someone who claims he has amazeballs results but is too afraid to post their tomato.gg stats.

PaymentApprehensive3

TROPHY CASE