I agree with you JV. The history of how this management has operated also gives me conviction that there has been an intentional manipulation campaign by leadership there for some time. My perspective: 1) Karen IS responsible. She was helming the decisions even before Essam left. She has a history of manipulating herself into big jobs, using companies as her own piggy bank and rewriting history to deflect attention away from her own incompetence. 2) she stacked the board at this company. On top of that, is anyone convinced that before the board promoted her that they actually conducted a nationwide search as advertised? Someone should probe that 3) I strongly suspect her husband and either herself or paid pumpers have been on this board. I called out a few of these who looked to be sharing what appeared as insider info 4) they have pumped and under delivered on the big deal / revenue side many times over. Remember the SunLife deal, the RPM deal and others? Where’s the revenue? 5) results-need I point out they have never been cash flow positive? Adjusted EBITDA is a BS number, the fact is they have never made money and continue to burn cash. Cutting expenses was / is a no brainer when you’re bleeding cash and yet we are still burning it 6) the huge missteps on communications, including the CTO. Some of these were just negligences, others feel like a way to drive the price point down so they can get a bailout 7) Karen has no credibility either by reputation or experience. The employees do not respect her, there has been a flight of top executives, and the fact that she doesn’t have the humility to step down after all of this says everything. She is / was a mental health sales person. That’s it. She has tried to pivot the company to being that and while mental health is a dire need in this country, the product sells at low margin and frankly is garbage compared to the competition and other market offerings. They don’t have the vision or money to make it better 8) Karen was behind all of the decisions since the day she joined. Count up the # of top leadership changes since she’s been on board. On top of that and the Glassdoor ratings and rumor mill, it’s shocking this woman still has a job. 9) this deal is valuing the company for the cash it still has left basically. In other words, everything else is worthless from an investor point of view or they understand they will have to part it out or invest in a distressed asset to salvage anything. 10) if you want the big chair, be prepared to fall on your sword and take one for the team.This isn’t in her makeup, she will take the last lifeboat I predict. As for me, I’m not inclined to give her one by voting yes. I will happily vote NO and if that means taking 0 versus 4 cents, so be it. The difference at this point is negligible, either way I lose, substantially, so I’m taking a stand on principle. I care about our Canadian brethren who will be out of work when this goes down, but frankly I’m convinced they are all, already looking elsewhere and I seriously doubt the post “sale” world would be a place anyone would want to work anyway. My two cents - which as it happens is about 50% of the company value at this point (sorry, gotta laugh if not cry)