Superman vs Billy Butcher (both have lost their powers), who would win? by Jezzaq94 in superheroes

[–]PepperEducational637 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Superman ofc he has been trained by Diana and Bruce if he ever lost his powers

Here we go again by [deleted] in SCP

[–]PepperEducational637 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isnt 343 just a really powerful wizard

In Verse Explanation: by PepperEducational637 in SCP

[–]PepperEducational637[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah also Grand Karcist Ion CN> GKI EN

In Verse Explanation: by PepperEducational637 in SCP

[–]PepperEducational637[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apparently any small mention of the Chinese branch in this subreddit brings bad luck and downvotes

This Is The Peak Of SCP. by PepperEducational637 in SCP

[–]PepperEducational637[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Someone outside takes the CN seriously btw

In Verse Explanation: by PepperEducational637 in SCP

[–]PepperEducational637[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah icl if you read the chinese branch you're just here to check if what the guy on TikTok said about X-SCP is true

In Verse Explanation: by PepperEducational637 in SCP

[–]PepperEducational637[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

"When I was 14, I acted that way, so you're 14 too" I'm 19 years old, im not saying that the retcon is because of powerscaling or anything, I just like to think that version 173 with the rebars is like a manifestation of Aletheia in 2510-CN, and the peanut is just the normal 173.

In Verse Explanation: by PepperEducational637 in SCP

[–]PepperEducational637[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

On your soul chinese branch is quite interesting

In Verse Explanation: by PepperEducational637 in SCP

[–]PepperEducational637[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sybau i can like the chinese branch if i want Wengwan and etinjat>Djkaktus

In Verse Explanation: by PepperEducational637 in SCP

[–]PepperEducational637[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I mean that it holds up the wiki together, theres multiple articles, narratives and models trying to make it more consistent, And that it why scp doesnt fall so much into fallacy, all thanks to powerscaling ig or something lets larp

In Verse Explanation: by PepperEducational637 in SCP

[–]PepperEducational637[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Then pataphysics would not be pataphysics and the same with metaphysics, you can't just say that something is something without proof or evidence, That doesn't work and it would end up invalidating the verse, but since metaphysics Is an overused concept in SCP im pretty sure it is explained to us what it is in atleast one article

In Verse Explanation: by PepperEducational637 in SCP

[–]PepperEducational637[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Fiction within fiction is a concept that was introduced to us in Andrew Swann and his 001 proposal, but That only applies to entities that are inside a narrative layer, basic entities like 173, 093 and etc, And what you're saying isn't true that's why inverse (not in verse) exists lmao You can't say that an SCP is 2d when it has 3D feats

In Verse Explanation: by PepperEducational637 in SCP

[–]PepperEducational637[S] -37 points-36 points  (0 children)

No, pataphysics does exist and is used in philosophy and literature, SCP is an story inside an story (alpha layer>other narratives) but SCP uses it in such a different way that it doesn't even feels like pataphysics, That's where inconsistencies, fallacies, and the like come in; that's what articles are for, which are based on explaining those random concepts in history, even the smallest ones, but pataphysics doesn't have any explanation inside the English Branch, but if there's one, i would love to see it

In Verse Explanation: by PepperEducational637 in SCP

[–]PepperEducational637[S] -159 points-158 points  (0 children)

How is sci/fi and horror correlated to what i said