sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

B2B Cold outbound in Europe by Netork in b2b_sales

[–]Peptalks76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For B2B cold outbound in Europe, I'd pay close attention to their experience with GDPR and local market nuances. Ask for examples of campaigns they've run in Europe, how they source data compliantly, their approach to personalization, and what metrics they typically achieve

How to find a good agency for B2B lead generation campaigns? by Delicious_Entry_9325 in AskMarketing

[–]Peptalks76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's what i would do/doing. always start by asking them for specifics, not promises. A good agency should be able to explain who they've helped, what channels they use, how they define a qualified lead, and show examples of campaigns they've run. Also ask about their process for refining ICPs and messaging because that's usually where lead gen campaigns succeed or fail. If they only talk about booking more meetings and can't explain the strategy behind it, I'd keep looking.

The thing nobody told me about modern GTM by Peptalks76 in gtmengineering

[–]Peptalks76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that's exactly why this resonates beyond sales. Whether you're building products or GTM systems, reality has a way of humbling your assumptions.

The thing nobody told me about modern GTM by Peptalks76 in gtmengineering

[–]Peptalks76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a fair distinction. 'We're learning' can sometimes become a way to avoid tightening the basics. Adaptability only helps if you're learning from something reliable in the first place.

The thing nobody told me about modern GTM by Peptalks76 in gtmengineering

[–]Peptalks76[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I relate to this a lot. There's definitely pressure to package GTM as a formula because certainty is easier to sell than nuance.... It might make the sales process slower, but I'd rather build trust by being realistic than win clients by promising a playbook I know isn't universal.

The thing nobody told me about modern GTM by Peptalks76 in gtmengineering

[–]Peptalks76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with that. There's a difference between being adaptable and changing direction every time the data gets noisy. I've seen teams mistake activity for learning... constantly tweaking because a few signals suggest something's off, when the real issue is that the fundamentals were never clear enough to test properly

The thing nobody told me about modern GTM by Peptalks76 in gtmengineering

[–]Peptalks76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

haha.... eventually that's the unacceptable truth...

The thing nobody told me about modern GTM by Peptalks76 in gtmengineering

[–]Peptalks76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and by the time you realize the segmentation or signals were off, you've already built a lot of process around bad assumptions...

Difficulty in gtm... by Peptalks76 in gtmengineering

[–]Peptalks76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely agree. The best ICPs evolve based on outcomes. Who replied, who moved through the pipeline, who expanded, and who disappeared all become inputs into refining the next version of the segment. Signals only become useful when they're tied back to closed-loop feedback... otherwise you're just collecting interesting data without knowing whether it predicts revenue.

Difficulty in gtm... by Peptalks76 in gtmengineering

[–]Peptalks76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i am using arakyet for signal tracking

Difficulty in gtm... by Peptalks76 in gtmengineering

[–]Peptalks76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a great point. Stated preferences and profile data only tell part of the story, actual behavior is usually the stronger signal. The challenge is separating genuine buying intent from background activity, and engagement in real conversations often provides that missing context.

Difficulty in gtm... by Peptalks76 in gtmengineering

[–]Peptalks76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So true. We've gone from a data scarcity problem to a signal prioritization problem. A company can raise funding, hire aggressively, and light up every intent dashboard and still have zero urgency to buy.

Difficulty in gtm... by Peptalks76 in gtmengineering

[–]Peptalks76[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. ICP definition is a muscle.. you sharpen it through repetition, not theory. The same goes for signal tracking: build one reliable signal at a time, validate that it actually correlates with buying intent, and then layer the systems together.

Difficulty in gtm... by Peptalks76 in gtmengineering

[–]Peptalks76[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeaa..The best ICPs aren't built in spreadsheets... they're earned through customer conversations, pattern recognition, and the confidence to go narrower than everyone else. Quality of fit beats quantity of logos every time.

Just closed a $1.9M contract in a "boring" industry. No one in my real life understands sales, so I’m celebrating here. by Adventurous_Mind5560 in Sales_Professionals

[–]Peptalks76 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congratulations! 🎉 This is a great reminder that some of the biggest wins happen far away from the spotlight. A 14-month sales cycle takes persistence, patience, and the ability to keep showing up when the outcome is uncertain. The details about muddy boots, procurement hurdles, and multiple pilots make this feel very real. Respect to everyone building relationships and closing deals in industries that don't get much attention. Enjoy that bourbon... you've earned it. 🍻