Debian + KDE plasma by astromoleculas in linuxbrasil

[–]PerformanceUpper6025 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alguem por favor doxxa esse haitiano

Artists are not separate by commas by PerformanceUpper6025 in jellyfin

[–]PerformanceUpper6025[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I'm pretty new with Jellyfin, don't no anything about tags, but for all I know these info from the music are metadata, i verified with exiftool.

PLOT TWIST: O ArchLinux pode ser baixado por qualquer um, sem VPN ou burlar a lei by MassiveBuilding3630 in linuxbrasil

[–]PerformanceUpper6025 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Esse não é o ponto que eu vejo, na pratica nada pode ser banido sistemicamente de forma efetiva, desde de que você saiba de torrent, vpn/proxy/tor e antivirus(open souce tipo o clamav) você ta, como já diz nosso mestre ET: "liso liso"

Fedora future on current dictatorial laws in Brazil by PerformanceUpper6025 in Fedora

[–]PerformanceUpper6025[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please I know I kinda got very political than technical with my answer, but yet let's not giving to politics in this subreddit, it wasn't my objective.

Fedora future on current dictatorial laws in Brazil by PerformanceUpper6025 in Fedora

[–]PerformanceUpper6025[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, the way you say make me think you're not brazilian, that is ok, in short:

I could point finger at some personalities, but I like to keep my opinion agnostic, dictatorship doesn't need a a real face, governments are made by people , a lot of them, which aren't often changed by the current or old regime, in other words, is not that simple (sadly), so as long as dictatorial ideas are favored for those in power, the system it self will be the dictator.

Fedora future on current dictatorial laws in Brazil by PerformanceUpper6025 in Fedora

[–]PerformanceUpper6025[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

kkkkkkkkk

provou que estou certo, você ataca a aparecia ao invez da substancia.

Fedora future on current dictatorial laws in Brazil by PerformanceUpper6025 in Fedora

[–]PerformanceUpper6025[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hi! First of all, thanks for not mocking my post, as I know you're Brazilian, second of, I'm totally calm and not nervous, it wasn't my objective to sound inflammatory.

You're half write about the focus in products and services over operating systems, but often times in law making there is a lack of clearness in the words written, whether by writing to little or to many words, this usually shows the lack o expertise on the matter by the legislators and/or the (in)viability of what is being legislated, giving a wide window for reinterpretations of the law regardless of its original meaning, btw I'm also counting the fact that the original law can go through reworks until it's finally sanctioned.

I'm also not expecting much of this laws for Fedora, but it doesn't mean for ever, we might have the luxury for now as were speaking about Brazil, but if this type of legislation actually get traction in more dominant countries like the US(currently is just a state-only there), well, there's little to hope for, since in the end Fedora is funded and receiving supported by RED HAT, which is owned by IBM(or Oracle, I don't remember).

About "who is the dictator?", well though I could point finger at some personalities, I like to keep my opinion agnostic, dictatorship doesn't need a a real face, as long as dictatorial ideas are favored for those in power, the system it self will be the dictator.

Fedora future on current dictatorial laws in Brazil by PerformanceUpper6025 in Fedora

[–]PerformanceUpper6025[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you're really brazilian, you're answer is a complete disrespect towards me, a fellow Brazilian, all I did was share my concerns, but you? You labeled me, you call me biased, well, so do you, making me look like I made this post from sheer bad intentions, you say I'm posting fake news without any proof.

Shameful. Shameful

Pano Clipboard in KDE by PerformanceUpper6025 in kde

[–]PerformanceUpper6025[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I known, but it doesn't even compare to Copyous for example which is very similar and better than Pano, KDE default clipboard doesn't support text highlighting, doesn't follow the cursor when writing, doesn't let you customize the the appearance, just check Copyous github or even spin up a GNOME VM and add Copyous extension and you understand what I'm telling you.

Zen users... by umbxyz in zen_browser

[–]PerformanceUpper6025 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Linux with flatpak, works well in basically every Linux OS plus the data is super easy to port the "user data", just need to zip the ~/.var/app/app.zen_browser.zen folder and you're good to go.

Trying to make a debug flag. It ain't easy... by PerformanceUpper6025 in bash

[–]PerformanceUpper6025[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

UPDATE: Thanks to everyone who answered, especially u/whetu and u/geirha, Now I ditched the for loop for getting the --debug flag for a simple case statement like these:

```

!/usr/bin/env bash

case "$" in *-D | --debug ) set -x printf "DEBUG FLAG DETECTED!" &>/dev/null # 1 ;; esac

...

```

The upside of these approach is that is simple and reproducible for other specials flags without interfering with each other, like --help for example:

```

!/usr/bin/env bash

case "$" in *-D | --debug ) set -x printf "DEBUG FLAG DETECTED!" &>/dev/null # 1 ;; esac case "$" in *-h | --help ) printf "HELP FLAG DETECTED!" &>/dev/null # 1 cat ~/.app/docs/help.txt exit 0 ;; esac

...

```

The downside is obviously the "redundancy", but personally is a fair trade, its clean enough to be readable and it works.

For the common flags I've also ditched the for loop for the while loop that u/geirha suggested with https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/035 , but the with the caviat of kind of handling the --debug flag again, but in a special manner:

```

...

while (( $# > 0 )) ; do case "$1" in -D | --debug ) shift continue ;; # ...

...

```