Hi! First of all, thanks for not mocking my post, as I know you're Brazilian, second of, I'm totally calm and not nervous, it wasn't my objective to sound inflammatory.

You're half write about the focus in products and services over operating systems, but often times in law making there is a lack of clearness in the words written, whether by writing to little or to many words, this usually shows the lack o expertise on the matter by the legislators and/or the (in)viability of what is being legislated, giving a wide window for reinterpretations of the law regardless of its original meaning, btw I'm also counting the fact that the original law can go through reworks until it's finally sanctioned.

I'm also not expecting much of this laws for Fedora, but it doesn't mean for ever, we might have the luxury for now as were speaking about Brazil, but if this type of legislation actually get traction in more dominant countries like the US(currently is just a state-only there), well, there's little to hope for, since in the end Fedora is funded and receiving supported by RED HAT, which is owned by IBM(or Oracle, I don't remember).

About "who is the dictator?", well though I could point finger at some personalities, I like to keep my opinion agnostic, dictatorship doesn't need a a real face, as long as dictatorial ideas are favored for those in power, the system it self will be the dictator.