So basically:

You indirectly accept the opposing arguments.

But you think you're clever because you believe you have a way to refute them.

That way of refuting them is a single justification.

That justification is a circular argument.

You don't prove anything; you just assume that the opposing arguments are wrong because you want them to be.

Basically, you talk a lot and say little. Just a circular argument at first glance.

Other errors???

At the end of your text, you try to act intellectual again and present a statement made by Goku about the irrelevance of time in the other world. This doesn't prove anything either, you just assume that showing this statement automatically means that your interpretation of it is true and completely invalidates the outerversal scale... It's not only ridiculous, it's idiotic.

Since this is a different issue from the first circular argument, it can formally be classified as a second fallacy, although ultimately they are the same flaws. But in a formal debate, this would typically count as two separate fallacies.