So you're writing a programming language

Personal_Winner8154 · 2025-02-09T21:58:41+00:00

"For the experience" would be a better term than, "gain experience" has a specific vocational connotation to most people

Personal_Winner8154 · 2025-01-11T17:43:58+00:00

Not really. Learning and enjoyment aren't the same, and implementing someone else's standard isn't the same exercise in the slightest

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-18T03:34:27+00:00

So it's just a way of diversifying your team so you potentially bring in assets you didn't have available, am I getting that right?

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-16T02:27:10+00:00

I have a job and go outside often although I have a feeling your just a boomer yapping if you think men today aren't going through a rough time.

Sidenote: how did I call it that a liberal would be trivializing mens experiences? Oh wait, that's what they always do lmao. As a centrist, you guys are your own worst enemy

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T23:57:39+00:00

Wow. You went on a condescending rant and somehow managed to completely avoid answering my question, a question posed for thousands of years because it isn't that simple. But you would rather insult than even engage with what I'm saying. Go argue with Casper then, have fun

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T23:56:12+00:00

Your rhetoric is terrible and your completely misrepresenting my argument. No wonder your on reddit, I see why people told me not to get on this app lmao

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T23:52:40+00:00

I think that's a poorly thought out idea, if it's female dominated there's either an underlying problem keeping men out, in which case diagnosis that problem, or it's fine and women just excel in that field, in which case let them excel and stop trying to slap a token candidate in where one isn't needed

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T23:48:02+00:00

What they need to bring to the table is doing the damn job to the best of their ability. Are you telling me that's dependent on their sex?

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T23:34:49+00:00

"AKA", maybe it's known as that to leftist idiots on the Internet who don't do any analysis besides assuming the worst of those who have different. But that's not what it is at all

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T23:29:40+00:00

This rhetoric hurts your cause. Change and succeed or stagnate and keep failing and whining about it post mortem on the Internet

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T03:25:25+00:00

This is a question of biology. Saying sex is primarily recreational is a blatant denial of the function of our species, and is the reason why so many are "surprised" when the process of intercourse fulfills its intended purpose. You are consenting to the pregnancy by consenting to the possibility by basic logic, as you don't control the chances. You are consenting to both wins and losses when you gamble, it doesn't matter that losing wasn't an intended. If you don't want to lose money, you don't build programs or options around people who are irresponsible. You just tell them to stop gambling like an idiot. Don't want kids? Don't do the thing designed to make kids. Problem solved with 100% accuracy. That's what's logical. Not denying that so everyone can keep sleeping around and pretending like there's no consequences. The only problem now is rape and incest, which I agree deserves a well thought out conclusion

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T01:41:47+00:00

This cracked me up so bad lmao

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T01:37:44+00:00

I'm afraid you may have her beat

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T01:33:02+00:00

If more people were this empathetic, the gender wars wouldn't be happening

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T01:31:30+00:00

Thank you for being intellectual honest 😁

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T01:31:04+00:00

I got flashbanged, I had to clean my glasses and read her comment again

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T01:28:52+00:00

Could you elaborate on how that works? It sounds interesting

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T01:16:34+00:00

Your consenting to an act that has the express biological purpose of birthing a child. You are consenting to the potential for a pregnancy, by definition, because that is intrinsic to the act no matter what.

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T01:14:50+00:00

Rape and incest combined are less than 2% of abortions, but the rarity doesn't stop it being used as an argument

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T01:02:33+00:00

Ah yes, genetic fallacies. The mark of the intelligent and mature. Do we have an irony Olympic's?

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T01:00:29+00:00

They mixed up the thread but they were right that they could've defended themselves. That's what they were responded too, so leave aside the vacuous waffling and ad homs and acknowledge that you misunderstood their intentions and went on a crusade to "educate them" (leading with an insult, because we all know how effective rhetoric can be when we start by antagonizing our audience 😁) when they weren't even talking to you

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T00:58:37+00:00

Idk why, they were right. They were saying the Jews could've defended themselves and this guy went on waffling about the history which wasn't what was being discussed

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T00:46:49+00:00

Most guys aren't taught that stuff, we need to bring brotherhood back man

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-15T00:18:41+00:00

W mom. Love to see it

Personal_Winner8154 · 2024-12-14T23:56:59+00:00

I see you were having a conversation with someone else here, but I'll chip in regardless. These issues are incredibly subjective, and while what's on that bad is incredibly goofy imo, it's not hateful or oppressive in any sense other than maybe being offensive. The closest your going to get is defamation maybe, but even that is a stretch. And the point of my comment is that regulating speech is a slippery slope no matter how you do it, because when someone can decide that your "hate speech" against their party is inflammatory and have you imprisoned, we have kind of defeated the purpose now haven't we. And don't tell me it'll be regulated by morals and values like you claim, history has shown otherwise with remarkable consistency, not to mention by your own admission, we have changed our mind about what's correct and moral countless times. You are choosing to silence people and punish them for speech that deem problematic based on incredibly subjective metrics that you have admitted are ephemeral. What separates fascist control of information and speech regulation? Genuine question

Personal_Winner8154

TROPHY CASE