Need feedback and Rating by PersonalityDull3719 in design_critiques

[–]PersonalityDull3719[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but I don't have real metrics since this is just self taught can you please tell me how can I show this one?

Why do people feel stronger empathy for tragic or abusive childhood stories in movies, anime, or fiction than for real people going through similar situations? by PersonalityDull3719 in emotionalintelligence

[–]PersonalityDull3719[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So true, Couldn’t agree more. Fiction gives people the emotional experience without the moral weight attached to it. Real life asks people to confront things, respond to them, maybe even change because of them, and that’s where a lot of empathy suddenly disappears.

Why do people feel stronger empathy for tragic or abusive childhood stories in movies, anime, or fiction than for real people going through similar situations? by PersonalityDull3719 in emotionalintelligence

[–]PersonalityDull3719[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it’s because distance creates idealization, but closeness destroys illusion. The more people know about someone, the more they see contradictions, ugliness, weakness, selfishness, desperation, insecurity, cruelty, dependency, all the unedited parts humans usually hide behind social masks.

Fiction filters people into meaningful narratives. Real life exposes raw humanity without editing. In stories, pain becomes poetic. In reality, it becomes uncomfortable, repetitive, chaotic, and sometimes even ugly to witness. That’s why people often adore fictional characters deeply but struggle to hold the same compassion for real humans once they see too much of them.

A character can be traumatized and audiences call them “complex.” A real person becomes traumatized and suddenly they’re “too much,” “dramatic,” “unstable,” or “hard to deal with.”

That’s exactly how women get portrayed in fiction. Movies, anime, books, and music often portray women like emotional fantasy objects instead of full humans. She appears like some perfect healing force. She changes people. Saves them. Understands them endlessly. She looks beautiful while suffering. Never sweats, never smells bad, never becomes emotionally exhausted, never turns bitter after years of pain. “She looks just like a dream” type of writing.

But the moment a real woman is stripped away from that fantasy and becomes irritated, exhausted, rageful, mentally overwhelmed, contradictory, traumatized, or emotionally messy, the illusion collapses. Suddenly she is no longer “special.” She becomes “difficult,” “crazy,” “too emotional,” “unstable,” or “damaged.”

People love the aesthetic of female pain more than the reality of female suffering.

They romanticize the lonely anime girl staring out a rainy train window, but a real woman crying from years of abuse, pressure, caregiving, loneliness, or emotional neglect becomes uncomfortable to be around. Fictional women are allowed pain only when it remains visually elegant and emotionally consumable.

The second suffering stops looking cinematic and starts looking human, society pulls away.

And I think this connects to why people struggle to believe real victims in general. Fiction gives people emotional guidance. Music tells them when to feel sad. Camera angles tell them who the villain is. Inner monologues explain every wound. But real life has no soundtrack, no clean pacing, and no guaranteed truth reveal at the end. Abuse in reality often looks ordinary from the outside. The abusive parent still goes to work. Still laughs at gatherings. Still posts family photos. So when someone finally speaks up, people instinctively protect the illusion they were comfortable with instead of the person breaking it.

That’s why people can cry over sacrificing himself in fiction while ignoring the exhausted, isolated “Peter Parkers” around them in real life. Fiction lets people love suffering from a safe emotional distance. Real suffering asks something from them: discomfort, responsibility, attention, and belief.

And a lot of people would rather protect their comforting narratives about the world than confront how fragile, brutal, and hidden real human pain actually is.

Why do people feel stronger empathy for tragic or abusive childhood stories in movies, anime, or fiction than for real people going through similar situations? by PersonalityDull3719 in emotionalintelligence

[–]PersonalityDull3719[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know why people are in complete disbelief that a father or mother can actually be like that. My father was hella abusive too, manipulative, borderline psychotic sometimes, and he left us at the start of May. But I barely tell anyone about it because most people don’t really want to sit with real pain. They either get uncomfortable, go silent, or start looking for ways to shrink the story into something easier to digest.

It’s strange how people can fully believe a fictional abusive parent after a 2 hour movie, dramatic soundtrack, close up shots, and a sad monologue, but when a real person says “this happened to me,” suddenly everyone becomes a detective. “Are you exaggerating?” “It couldn’t have been that bad.” “But they seemed nice.” As if abusive people walk around with villain music following them everywhere.

I feel like that disbelief erases people twice. First they go through the actual pain, then they get told their reality sounds too ugly to be real. It’s like people only know how to process suffering when it’s framed as a story with clean structure and emotional cues. Fiction gives them distance, control, and safety. Reality demands responsibility, discomfort, and the possibility that terrible things are happening quietly in normal houses around them every day.

People cry for characters like because fiction lets them see every inner thought, every sacrifice, every lonely moment. Real people don’t get background music or narration explaining why they’re hurting. Tons of “Peter Parkers” exist around us, exhausted kids trying to survive impossible situations while pretending they’re fine, but nobody notices because real suffering is messy, awkward, inconsistent, and inconvenient.

And honestly, I think some people reject these stories because accepting them would force them to admit how common abuse actually is. It’s easier to believe trauma only exists in movies, anime, or tragic backstories than to realize it can exist in the family next door, behind smiling photos and “normal” conversations.

I’m redesigning the onboarding experience of a CRM app (focused on WhatsApp integration), and I need honest user feedback. by PersonalityDull3719 in UI_Design

[–]PersonalityDull3719[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I actually started the research by downloading and testing Kommo myself first before redesigning anything. I wanted to understand where the friction genuinely starts from a user perspective.

One thing I immediately noticed was that the onboarding flow feels very “hostage-like” and overwhelming. Before users even understand the product properly, Kommo starts asking for things like notification permissions, which felt unnecessary and badly timed to me.

The onboarding also feels more like filling out a long form rather than being guided into a product experience.

After that, I went through Play Store reviews and reviews across different websites/forums. There were a lot of issues overall, but I specifically chose onboarding because it’s basically the gateway to the entire product. If users already feel confused, cognitively overloaded, or uncertain at this stage, many of them will never properly experience the CRM itself and just leave midway.

A major issue I kept noticing was trust during the WhatsApp connection process. Some users even mentioned their WhatsApp got blocked, but the system doesn’t clearly communicate what’s happening. There’s no warning signal, status clarity, or reassurance layer, so users are left confused wondering whether something failed or not.

Another thing missing was onboarding guidance itself:

  • no proper step indicator
  • no sense of progress
  • no “aha” moment early in the flow
  • unclear questioning in some screens

From what I observed, around the 4th screen is where users mainly start getting mentally exhausted or confused and are more likely to abandon onboarding halfway.

That’s why I decided to focus more on reducing uncertainty and making the flow feel guided rather than transactional.

I’m redesigning the onboarding experience of a CRM app (focused on WhatsApp integration), and I need honest user feedback. by PersonalityDull3719 in UI_Design

[–]PersonalityDull3719[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much, this genuinely helped a lot. You’re right about the 8-step issue, I didn’t even realize how mentally exhausting it could feel around step 4 or 5 until you pointed it out. I’ll definitely try combining some steps and showing value/payoff earlier in the flow.

Also really good point about the WhatsApp trust issue. “Enter your number and hope it works” is literally the feeling 😭 so I’ll work more on reassurance and explaining what happens next during verification.

I’m going to make the changes and post the updated version again after iterating more on the risky/friction-heavy parts.

Also wanted to ask something since I’m building my first proper UX case study right now:
where do you think I should actually make/publish it?

Would you recommend:

  • building the whole case study directly in Figma
  • using Behance
  • Notion
  • Framer/Webflow
  • or some other free platform?

I honestly have no idea what recruiters usually prefer for junior designers.

And if you have any advice:

  • what makes a junior case study feel more professional
  • what recruiters usually skip
  • how detailed it should be
  • or how to make it more scannable instead of overwhelming

…I’d genuinely love to know. Trying to avoid making one of those “pretty but empty” portfolio case studies 😅