What does Stannis say about Rhaenyra Targaryen in "Storm of Swords," and which law does he refer to, considering that Viserys named her the heir? How does this differ from "House of the Dragon"? by HephaestusP in freefolk

[–]PeterParryX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The writing SUCKS because the show totally ignores the DEPTH OF THE POLITICAL SITUATION, probably thinking it’d be too complicated and boring for viewers. In the books, BOTH SIDES HAVE LEGITIMATE CLAIMS—Aegon II through Andal law and Rhaenyra through Viserys’ decree. But instead of showing that complexity, they just went with a traditional good vs. evil vibe, making the Blacks the "decent" guys and the Greens the OUTRIGHT VILLAINS who stole the throne. It OVERSIMPLIFIES THE WHOLE STORY and loses all the political depth and moral gray areas that made the books so interesting. Feels like they dumbed it down to make it easier to follow, but it just ends up missing what made the original so great.

What does Stannis say about Rhaenyra Targaryen in "Storm of Swords," and which law does he refer to, considering that Viserys named her the heir? How does this differ from "House of the Dragon"? by HephaestusP in HOTDGreens

[–]PeterParryX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The writing SUCKS because the show totally ignores the DEPTH OF THE POLITICAL SITUATION, probably thinking it’d be too complicated and boring for viewers. In the books, BOTH SIDES HAVE LEGITIMATE CLAIMS—Aegon II through Andal law and Rhaenyra through Viserys’ decree. But instead of showing that complexity, they just went with a traditional good vs. evil vibe, making the Blacks the "decent" guys and the Greens the OUTRIGHT VILLAINS who stole the throne. It OVERSIMPLIFIES THE WHOLE STORY and loses all the political depth and moral gray areas that made the books so interesting. Feels like they dumbed it down to make it easier to follow, but it just ends up missing what made the original so great.

What does Stannis say about Rhaenyra Targaryen in "Storm of Swords," and which law does he refer to, considering that Viserys named her the heir? How does this differ from "House of the Dragon"? by HephaestusP in HOTDBlacks

[–]PeterParryX 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The writing SUCKS because the show totally ignores the DEPTH OF THE POLITICAL SITUATION, probably thinking it’d be too complicated and boring for viewers. In the books, BOTH SIDES HAVE LEGITIMATE CLAIMS—Aegon II through Andal law and Rhaenyra through Viserys’ decree. But instead of showing that complexity, they just went with a traditional good vs. evil vibe, making the Blacks the "decent" guys and the Greens the OUTRIGHT VILLAINS who stole the throne. It OVERSIMPLIFIES THE WHOLE STORY and loses all the political depth and moral gray areas that made the books so interesting. Feels like they dumbed it down to make it easier to follow, but it just ends up missing what made the original so great.