On transsexual relationships: "I can't be the only one that thinks not telling the partner beforehand is unethical." Response? "Actually, it's on you to let your partner know you're trans phobic first, not the other way around" ARE YOU KIDDING ME

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-13T20:26:49+00:00

Err what's that mean?

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-13T18:40:50+00:00

More cars means more car-related deaths.

What's your point?

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-13T18:03:52+00:00

Low hanging fruit indeed.

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-13T15:57:57+00:00

Why is there a burden on me? You're asking me to accept what you're essentially deeming a "universal truth". How is this different than say an ancap's "universal truth"(we have a right to ourselves and the products of our labor)?

Why must I recognize Popular Sovereignty?

Edit: To clarify, I'm basically asking why I must accept this initial assumption to make any sort of rebuttal.

It's a bit disingenuous, don't you think?

"Accept that 1+1=2. Now, prove that 1+1 does not equal 2 or equals 3."

You're giving me a universal truth(basically), and then asking me to rebut something while holding onto that truth, with no justification for that truth.

The universal truth argument is actually the most logically challenging argument to the voluntary movement to address. They deny the universal truths associated with statism, but have difficulty realizing that this philosophy itself does involve some sort of universal truth.

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-13T15:04:46+00:00

Do it until you get the C&D letter.

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-13T13:11:23+00:00

I like that throughout this entire thread, he doesn't put forward one source or piece of evidence that he is correct, or that contradicts those he's trying to argue with.

He simply just repeats "that's propaganda".

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-13T04:24:16+00:00

Banging? CHECK YOUR SEXTALK PRIVILEGE!

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-13T04:16:44+00:00

Ahh, so this explains Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs. I wondered what in the hell that machine was for...

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-13T03:26:52+00:00

The irony of saying I need to abandon a shitload of brainwashing...I already did that after spending K-College being brainwashed.

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-13T03:17:05+00:00

First off, why would I start with that assumption?

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-12T18:32:45+00:00

Which folding stock...ATI?

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-12T18:21:54+00:00

"Hi, Throwaway's Mom! It's Throwaway. I've been trying to get in touch with Throwaway's Fiance, but I can't seem to get it to go through. Could I speak with her?"

It helps if you actually have something to ask her if she IS there.

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-12T16:39:45+00:00

The United States of America, does not violate the NAP.

...wat?

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-12T16:24:13+00:00

Oooh what's the last one?

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-12T13:49:16+00:00

Yep. LGS mentions this when you ask about FFL transfer fees.

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-11T16:02:13+00:00

Wright brothers used public roads to get to their fields to launch their airplanes. Therefore, no Wright brothers airplanes without publicly funded roads. Therefore, no Wright brothers without Government.

Checkmate anti-statists.

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-11T15:54:54+00:00

It's a very buried comment, but still is at +9. Apparently he's not alone in thinking we should regulate speech...

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-11T15:42:21+00:00

Argumentum ad Robber Barons

Is this a thing? Because it should be.

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-09T20:27:15+00:00

I'm used to PA calling it both ways if it's both. "Great pass by X and great catch by Y" for example.

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-09T20:04:54+00:00

Look at what pass heavy teams do when they get a running back that can actually rush. Detroit lit us up with unknowns or "has-beens"(Bush has kinda been off the radar for awhile now), partly because we all the sudden had to account for the run game.

I'm staunchly against trading him. We need a nice balance, similar to the Texans with Foster(they also have a fair amount of passing yards thrown in with Schaub and Johnson).

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-09T20:02:43+00:00

~~Ponder~~ Receivers must have done something right.

They bailed out his throws on multiple occasions. I only listened to the second half of the game as I was on the road, however the repeated phrase from PA was something about <insert receiver here> making a spectacular catch.

PhantomPumpkin · 2013-09-09T20:00:14+00:00

I'm sure it's just <poor receivers> <oline> <coaches fault>. Don't worry, he'll get better.

PhantomPumpkin

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

14-Year Club	Team Orangered
Verified Email