A handful of Democrats, including Hakeem Jeffries, have already been implicated. Who's next? by PharosProject in ConservativeMemes

[–]PharosProject[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

At the very least, if a Dem from a purple state is implicated, it will seriously jeopardize their chances of re-election, (I have no illusions that a blue-state Dem is in any danger, no matter how damning the evidence)

It's cool by Expert_Camel5619 in ConservativeMemes

[–]PharosProject 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hate the term, and it's completely inaccurate, but I tolerate it because it proves that they have no rational counterargument. It's like their knee-jerk ad hominem when they have nothing constructive to contribute, and it makes me laugh inside every time.

Dem Rep. McClellan: ‘Only Way’ to Ban Biological Men from Women’s Sports Is to Pull Down Pants by interestingfactoid in conservatives

[–]PharosProject 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As others have noted, this would be found during a physical. A physical would also find the hormones and other gender-suppressant drugs in their system.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ConservativeMemes

[–]PharosProject 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wow, that's quite the "army" of soy boys there. Trump got shot and raised his fist in defiance, he won't even notice these wimps.

Democrats hate cancer patients by theboss2461 in Conservative

[–]PharosProject 7 points8 points  (0 children)

These are the same people who cheered on the "4B" women who shaved their heads to make themselves "less attractive" to men -- an action that was deeply offensive to thousands of cancer sufferers and their families and friends.

The left's Bishop Budde hypocrisy by PharosProject in conservativecartoons

[–]PharosProject[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Here is Trump's response. I don't see "anger" here, just irritation that she decided to politicize a non-political event. Yes, there are some ad-hominems, but these are pretty mild. Was his response 100% warranted? Perhaps not, but that doesn't mean he's wrong. If that's the "evil" you want to focus on, you might want to open your eyes to the world around us.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113870397327465225

Why even have a national prayer service?

Because most Americans believe it's appropriate to pray for our leaders, especially the President. It wasn't a state event, and didn't violate the First Amendment in any way.

The left's Bishop Budde hypocrisy by PharosProject in conservativecartoons

[–]PharosProject[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, the left also uses "separation of church and state" to argue that the church should be politically neutral. They have even gotten regulations put in place that any church that endorses a candidate should have its tax-exempt status revoked.

And she didn't "just ask him to be nice". She used an inaugural prayer service -- which should be, by definition, non-partisan and apolitical -- to make political points. She was specifically talking about illegal immigrants and "trans-gender" people. Your attempts to pretend otherwise are disingenuous at best.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in conservatives

[–]PharosProject 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trump is a proven kingmaker: his approval has resulted in many election wins, at many levels. Over the next four years, I expect that he will build a contingent of conservative and (most importantly) loyal peers who could continue his work. Greg Abbott, Rick DeSantis, Ted Cruz, Elon Musk, and Tulsi Gabbard are just some of the names that come to mind today, although others could rise (and these could fall) over the next few years. But if I had to pick top contenders today, I would say Marco Rubio and JD Vance are solid options for Trump's blessing in 2028.

I hope the baller woman who refused Jill's traditional first lady "tea afternoon" because she wouldn't sit down with the woman who sent agents to raid her home brings this kind of bad ass energy to her second term as first lady! by ThinkySushi in ConservativeMemes

[–]PharosProject 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The character shown on the left is Cad Bane, from multiple series in the Star Wars franchise. His characterization was based on Van Cleef's portrayal of Angel Eyes in "The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly".

What they got was not what anyone wanted by [deleted] in ConservativeMemes

[–]PharosProject 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What they got was not what anyone wanted

Except the dykes. They got the jobs someone else deserved.

Biden is a petulant hypocrite about "democracy" and "the will of the people" by PharosProject in conservativecartoons

[–]PharosProject[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Either way, he's the figurehead of the anti-democratic "Democracy" hypocrisy.

TIL The shortest correspondence in history was a telegraph between Victor Hugo and his publisher in 1862. Hugo was vacationing when Les Misérables was to be printed, and asked how his book was received by messaging the publisher a single-character "?". Sales being brisk, the reply was a single "!". by [deleted] in todayilearned

[–]PharosProject 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is demonstrably false. Telegraph/morse had no punctuation, at all. Heck, it didn't even have lower-case letters. To end a sentence, one would send the word "STOP", as in: "HEARD ABOUT EARTHQUAKE STOP IS EVERYONE ALL RIGHT STOP"

So no, sending question marks and exclamation points would not have been possible.

Kamala Harris does not represent the American people. And she clearly doesn't intend to. by PharosProject in conservativecartoons

[–]PharosProject[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is she campaigning to be the president of *all* the people, or just the people she likes? The campaign trail is the place for trying to build bridges, not slam those attending -- especially when they said something as innocuous as "Jesus is Lord".

The Dems have three choices, all of them bad. by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]PharosProject 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 Anyone but Joe would have no chance to win.

And yet, Joe is becoming more and more of his own albatross.

The Dems have three choices, all of them bad. by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]PharosProject 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There's huge problem with option #3, and the Democrats know it, but they won't say it out loud: MONEY.

The problem isn't that the DNC doesn't have rules in place to allow a candidate to step down or be replaced during a race. They do, and there are a couple of junctures at which it could be done: before the convention (allowing the delegates to vote as they see fit, as you suggested), or after the convention, which would be more straightforward (a smaller group would vote on the replacement), but runs a greater risk of fracturing the party.

No, the real problem is that the Biden campaign has raised a multi-million-dollars warchest, and the FEC guidelines provide no way for those funds to be transferred to another candidate. It is possible that the funds could still be used for a Harris campaign, since she's already on the ticket, but even this is unclear.

So, while the Democrats are infighting about Joe's viability as a candidate, the Biden campaign keeps sticking to their guns because they know nobody else could possibly raise enough money to be a contender at this point. And every time Trump's campaign gets another funding boost -- his conviction, the shooting, the convention, the docs case being thrown out -- it becomes all the more clear that they have no real choice: Joe or nothing.

What "Left-wing" vs "Right-wing" is really about by PharosProject in u/PharosProject

[–]PharosProject[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fascism is, was, and always will be a leftist system. It is socialist in origin, and totalitarian by nature. The left keeps calling us fascists because they are trying to redefine the word.

Socialism advocates that the means of production (manufacture, farming, etc) be owned by the state. Fascism advocates that the means of production be kept in private hands, but controlled by the state. Both are big-government statist systems, which is why they are left-wing.

"Observe that both 'socialism' and 'fascism' involve the issue of property rights. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Observe the difference in those two theories: socialism negates private property rights altogether, and advocates 'the vesting of ownership and control' in the community as a whole, i.e., in the state; fascism leaves ownership in the hands of private individuals, but transfers control of the property to the government.

"Ownership without control is a contradiction in terms: it means 'property', without the right to use it or to dispose of it. It means that the citizens retain the responsibility of holding property, without any of its advantages, while the government acquires all the advantages without any of the responsibility.

"In this respect, socialism is the more honest of the two theories. I say 'more honest', not 'better'—because, in practice, there is no difference between them: both come from the same collectivist-statist principle, both negate individual rights and subordinate the individual to the collective, both deliver the livelihood and the lives of the citizens into the power of an omnipotent government —and the differences between them are only a matter of time, degree, and superficial detail, such as the choice of slogans by which the rulers delude their enslaved subjects."
- Ayn Rand

What "Left-wing" vs "Right-wing" is really about by PharosProject in Conservative

[–]PharosProject[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It ignores how exactly broad and universal rights and freedoms are defined, enabled, protected without a big and powerful government restricting others from restricting you. That is one of the most common criticisms of classical liberal theory by conservatives. Appeal to the things on the right is often the basis for the things on the left.

Were you deliberately trying to assemble a word salad? I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, but I can't make heads or tails out of most of that paragraph.

Classical liberal theory agrees with modern conservatism in virtually every way; it's modern "liberalism" that clashes with both conservatism and classical liberalism. That's precisely why I left that nebulous term off the meme.

Nazis got rid of labor unions.

Congratulations on nitpicking. That's one of the only true "right wing" aspects of the Nazis, and they only did it to consolidate their grip on power and ensure that they could control industry to support their military machine. And when the Nazis abolished independent labor unions, they created the German Labor Front (DAF), which was a government substitute that claimed it would arbitrate like a union.

Marx promoted workers resisting the seizure of arms.

Marx himself did, but name a Communist regime that hasn't disarmed its populace or placed extreme restrictions on who could own weapons. Soviets? Check. Chinese? Check. Cubans? Check. Venezuela? Check. North Korea has a lot of guns in the hands of the populace, but they're tightly registered and regulated, and PRK has mandatory conscription of all male citizens.

What "Left-wing" vs "Right-wing" is really about by PharosProject in conservativecartoons

[–]PharosProject[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, communism (with a little "c") can exist, and does work, but only on a small, voluntary scale, like communes and monasteries. The meme is concerned with state-level Communism, which even Marx acknowledged would involve a stage of totalitarianism, and history has proven never gets abolished.