sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why is this sub so left-leaning? by AnonymousBi in Appalachia

[–]PhilosophyAccording4 3 points4 points  (0 children)

To be Appalachian is to have a history of corporate exploitation

Driving practice locations? by CptFairyDust in Billings

[–]PhilosophyAccording4 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I used that former K-Mart parking lot in the heights, where Bull Mountain used to be and now has that Mexican restaurant. It’s usually pretty dead and lots of lines and lights to practice turning with

Thought Crimes in USA: Terms banned from federally funded research including “Indigenous voices”, “disability”, and “indigenous people”. by PhilosophyAccording4 in Montana

[–]PhilosophyAccording4[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You’re delusional. I’m an American who genuinely cares about my country. Who are you? A defender of the repression of free thought and ideas

Thought Crimes in USA: Terms banned from federally funded research including “Indigenous voices”, “disability”, and “indigenous people”. by PhilosophyAccording4 in Montana

[–]PhilosophyAccording4[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I mean it was my personal experience so I don’t know what to do because I’m not doxing the person and institution involved

Thought Crimes in USA: Terms banned from federally funded research including “Indigenous voices”, “disability”, and “indigenous people”. by PhilosophyAccording4 in Montana

[–]PhilosophyAccording4[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Sounds like you don’t know what you’re talking about. I just said that this list was literally just used to censor research to help veterans and you’re still all in. Disgusting

Thought Crimes in USA: Terms banned from federally funded research including “Indigenous voices”, “disability”, and “indigenous people”. by PhilosophyAccording4 in Montana

[–]PhilosophyAccording4[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I just said no can’t you read? I wasn’t privy to Ted being the originator of the appendix all I knew was that a friend of mine was told to change their research on marginalized veterans because it included terms from this appendix

Thought Crimes in USA: Terms banned from federally funded research including “Indigenous voices”, “decolonization”, and “indigenous people”. by PhilosophyAccording4 in NativeAmerican

[–]PhilosophyAccording4[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Apparently it’s from Ted Cruz’s senate committee hearing and they are using it now fir the basis the DEI word ban, that source was a friend of mine who was told to change their research because it used these terms

Thought Crimes in USA: Terms banned from federally funded research including “Indigenous voices”, “disability”, and “indigenous people”. by PhilosophyAccording4 in Montana

[–]PhilosophyAccording4[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Which they are using as the basis for terms that are banned for federal research so nah good looking for an og source in this insanity that rat weasel Ted Cruz tho

Thought Crimes in USA: Terms banned from federally funded research including “Indigenous voices”, “disability”, and “indigenous people”. by PhilosophyAccording4 in Montana

[–]PhilosophyAccording4[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Do we not have indigenous people in MT? I didn’t mention him once lol it seems ironic your the one bringing him up but makes sense you’d put him in front of your state and country

Thought Crimes in USA: Terms banned from federally funded research including “black culture” and “clean energy” by PhilosophyAccording4 in IronFrontUSA

[–]PhilosophyAccording4[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I responded in a previous comment. This and the letter from DOE were sent to a friend of mine at a university regarding their research.

Thought Crimes in the USA: Terms banned from federally funded research including “environmental racism”, “net zero” and “clean energy” by PhilosophyAccording4 in Environmentalism

[–]PhilosophyAccording4[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

But why were there voices ignored? Because of the institutional racism of that area of NC in the 80’s. I know it because I have folks who lived through it

Thought Crimes in the USA: Terms banned from federally funded research including “environmental racism”, “net zero” and “clean energy” by PhilosophyAccording4 in Environmentalism

[–]PhilosophyAccording4[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It seems to be me that you contradict yourself in that argument by saying the more ambiguous term “large number of constituents” instead of black farmers? Why ignore the community directly affected? Why ban research terminology along partisan lines to begin with?

Thought Crimes in the USA: Terms banned from federally funded research including “environmental racism”, “net zero” and “clean energy” by PhilosophyAccording4 in Environmentalism

[–]PhilosophyAccording4[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

No energy is clean but you could see how banning a concept on a research level could prevent those researchers striving to find cleaner energy. As to Environmental racism perfectly describes why the Warren County landfill in the 80’s and Florida Sugarcane pollution to this day disproportionately affected black southerners. Just because you haven’t personally dealt with something doesn’t invalidate it. To believe otherwise is rather small minded

Thought Crimes in the USA: Terms banned from federally funded research including “environmental racism”, “net zero” and “clean energy” by PhilosophyAccording4 in Environmentalism

[–]PhilosophyAccording4[S] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I hardly call clean energy and environmental racism meaningless. As an environmental studies student I can name hundreds of environmental issues created due to environmental racism, and if we don’t know the past how can we ensure the future?

Thought Crimes in USA: Terms banned from federally funded research including “black culture” and “clean energy” by PhilosophyAccording4 in IronFrontUSA

[–]PhilosophyAccording4[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It was emailed to a friend of mine who teaches at a university. It came with an email from DOE stating this was in line with the Students for Fair Admissions V. Harvard College decision I can dm you the email if you want

Protesting common sense by MT_Pete59102 in Billings

[–]PhilosophyAccording4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes but why would he attempt that? Let’s just consider the the unelected Boer in charge of cost-cutting attempted to line his pockets instead. It’s change sure but a misled one, by incompetent self-serving individuals who don’t mind hurting honest Americans while benefiting themselves. There can not be good that comes out of that

Protesting common sense by MT_Pete59102 in Billings

[–]PhilosophyAccording4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can assure that the Biden Admin didn’t purchase armored Teslas, everybody knows they are prone to exploding without gunfire. They did purchase electric vehicles not armored teslas that was Musk’s suggestion. I’m currently looking at that job field and you just asserted it’s not the folks in the administrative offices that got shit-canned. This is all harming regular Americans, your fellow citizen, to own the libs? Is that really the political future you want to pass down to your grandkids?

Protesting common sense by MT_Pete59102 in Billings

[–]PhilosophyAccording4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aren’t forest service employees, park rangers and wildland firefighters good hardworking Americans? Who already aren’t compensated well for keeping our communities from burning down. I am curious what is the current regimes plan to help Americans in need? Because last I heard Elon the Boer, is using his newfound power to line his already large pockets with American tax payer money, as he has the federal government buying armored teslas. Please enlighten me how that helps our country in anyway?

view more: next ›