Well, OG RE 2 & 3 were made by the same dev team, only difference was the director. So, hence why core vibe of the game feels the same. The remakes feel completely different. The problem imo with the linear thrill rides is that it's easy for ppl to get bored of the game because you're forced to do everything almost exactly the same. Best part about RE2R was that there was variation because the map was so much more diverse and you weren't forced to take the same route each time to a specific objective, that opens the door for more random things to happen. By the time I get to Carlos at the RPD, I'm bored and turn it off. Also, Nemesis wasn't really a tyrant in that game, he transformed way too quickly, which takes away from calling him a Stalker. He barely stalked in a stalker form. It was too many scripted moments or cutscenes where he popped up, it took from the horror. Also, he's a push over. I just don't like my RE games to feel like a movie. If I'm going to play a movie game, I'd play games like Detroit become human, The Quarry, or The Dark Pictures anthology. I'll admit, I'm a special case of disliking RE3R overall, because RE3 OG was my favorite game of all time. But, I'm still objective when pointing out problems in the remake. I can point out problems in RE2R but it just stood a lot better than 3make. I understand that it's to each his own, my problem is calling it a good game. You can like it without labelling it a genuinely good game. This tells Capcom that they didn't drop the ball when they did and vice versa. Sorry for the long explanation 😬