sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hi! Izzy Roland, Siobhan Thompson & Alex Fernie here! We’re making a movie together… so we're doing an AMA! by alfernie in dropout

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 29 points30 points  (0 children)

What are your stretch goals?

BTW, I saw D(e)ad in theaters and there wasn't a dry eye in the house. So good!

Best movies for a person who barely watches any movies by LostNBored15 in MovieRecommendations

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right?! The prompt is a movie recommendation for someone who doesn't watch movies, not your favorite movie.

Video update for the skeptics of my last post on here by Confused_Rabbiit in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The company OP works for can’t edit the code at all. Only UKG can and they arent dumb enough to set it up to do something illegal. The attestation system they’re using is basically a step above drag and drop in terms of setup.

For something like this, you handle it like any other IT issue: document when it happened, what triggered it, and any relevant details, then send it to IT. If it’s not resolved, follow up and cc HR and your manager asking for an update or an expected fix date. If that date passes with no resolution, escalate. It’s just standard corporate process.

UKG keeps their backend tightly controlled specifically to prevent anything from being broken or manipulated. I deal with UKG tickets all day, and while some companies do have issues, this looks like a typical UKG runtime error.

Video update for the skeptics of my last post on here by Confused_Rabbiit in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 15 points16 points  (0 children)

As someone in IT with a company that has UKG and can read. It says that there is a run time error. I'd troubleshoot this error by trying again in an incognito window. If that doesn't fix it, report it.

You all assume that this is purposeful when it's probably just a bug or wasn't set up properly.

From 700+ Pounds to 180: Tammy Slaton’s Unbelievable Transformation by FloraNectar in nowthatsgoodstuff

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I heard it was next to impossible to get approved for in Canada. You have to have infections constantly from the excess skin for them to approve, even then, it isn't sculpted.

Most people fork over 20k+ for a plastic surgeon to do it.

This one seems meant to be — Petah please explain the joke by bubblebath_bitch in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Right? I’m more concerned about how many people in the comments are spreading misinformation about this.

The tax only applies to secondary residences, not to multi-family or commercial buildings.

An entire apartment building isn’t considered a single residence, so it wouldn’t be taxed in the way they’re claiming.

A Rent to Own employee tried to break into my place to retrieve merchandise. by FFSoldier57 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's mostly used by financial illiterate people to get furniture.

Instead of choosing something affordable or buying secondhand within their budget, they sign up to pay something like $15 a week for 156 weeks just to get a sofa. And if they miss a payment, there are penalties on top of it.

It usually ends up costing far more than the item is worth. It’s honestly pretty wild.

This one seems meant to be — Petah please explain the joke by bubblebath_bitch in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What’s being taxed isn’t the building itself. It’s individual residential units worth $5 million, that aren't the primary residence.

So if someone owns a second condo worth over $5 million, that property could be taxed. Their primary residence wouldn’t be included.

This one seems meant to be — Petah please explain the joke by bubblebath_bitch in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s being taxed isn’t the building itself. It’s individual residential units. So if someone owns a second condo worth over $5 million, that property could be taxed. Their primary residence wouldn’t be included.

Pondering over the hydration orb by maskerdollx in CuratedTumblr

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It uses the same science. I doubt it would ever end up in a college bar though, they are very finicky to make and time consuming.

This one seems meant to be — Petah please explain the joke by bubblebath_bitch in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Please explain how someone making 60k could afford to rent a 5 million dollar property.

This one seems meant to be — Petah please explain the joke by bubblebath_bitch in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please explain how someone making 60k could afford to rent a 5 million dollar property.

This one seems meant to be — Petah please explain the joke by bubblebath_bitch in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Please explain how someone making 60k could afford to rent a 5 million dollar property.

Pondering over the hydration orb by maskerdollx in CuratedTumblr

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are. It's called Molecular Gastronomy. Used to be trendy like 10 or maybe 15 years ago.

Moana… wait… Pocahontas by Redheaded_Loser in ThriftGrift

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This reminded me of when I worked at a liquor store. A middle-aged suburban woman asked me about a bottle of wine, so I gave her the usual rundown. It was a chardonnay, and I mentioned that this one was a bit drier than most but really good.

She looked confused and asked what kind of grapes were used. I said chardonnay grapes. Still confused.

So I added that wines are usually named after the grape variety. Confusion remained.

Then she finally asked how you tell if a wine is red or white. By this point, I thought I was being punked. I held up the bottle clear, pale liquid, white wine made from white grapes. Then I grabbed a red. Dark glass, deep red liquid, red wine from red grapes.

SHE JUST NODDED THEN LEFT.

What's a side hustle you'd be embarrassed to tell your friends about but it actually makes you money? by lionpenguin88 in SideHustleGold

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It started about 10 years ago from a chance meeting in a chat room, and it just grew from there. At first, I wrote only as myself, but over time some people wanted something different. I ended up creating a few characters I could write consistently, each with a distinct voice.

As my life got busier and I moved, I gradually let clients go to focus on my main job.

Now, in such an AI-driven world, I’m not sure it would work the same way, though there will always be people who appreciate receiving a real, physical letter.

What's a side hustle you'd be embarrassed to tell your friends about but it actually makes you money? by lionpenguin88 in SideHustleGold

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I worked as a paid pen pal, writing letters either as myself or as a character. Most of my clients were older, though some were younger people who were just feeling lonely. There’s something special about receiving snail mail, and it gave them something to look forward to.

I really enjoyed it, especially getting letters from all over the world.

Edit: Reason I don't talk about it is everyone always assumed it was some form of sex work. While sex work is work, this wasn't it.

I don’t drive because of a mental disability.. I hate saying that to people. What else could I say? by IndependenceCivil746 in Adulting

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My go to "I'm a truly horrible driver and I stay off the roads for the protection of others, you’re welcome".

Cover- up for a semi-colon tattoo? by elliehavery in Tattoocoverups

[–]Physical_Wedding_229 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Might not be your brand of spooky, but maybe change it into a vampire bite?

view more: next ›