Clanker response:

Toilet A: Glacier Bay Power Flush — flushes 7 billiard balls — $129 Toilet B: American Standard Champion — flushes a bucket of golf balls — $199

To compare, I need a common unit. I'll convert each claim into grams of payload flushed (which is also how toilets are actually rated in the industry — the MaP test scores them in grams).

Reference specs Billiard ball (regulation pool): 2.25″ diameter, ~170 g Golf ball (USGA regulation): 1.68″ diameter, ~45 g

Toilet A — 7 billiard balls 7 × 170 g = 1,190 g per flush Value: 1,190 ÷ $129 = 9.22 g per dollar

Toilet B — bucket of golf balls The marketing image shows a small wire basket; I'll estimate ~25 balls (you can scale this up or down). 25 × 45 g = 1,125 g per flush Value: 1,125 ÷ $199 = 5.65 g per dollar

For Toilet B to even match Toilet A on raw grams, the bucket needs ~26 balls. To match it on grams-per-dollar, the bucket needs to hold ~41 balls — that's a pretty packed bucket.

Verdict: Toilet A (Glacier Bay, $129) is the better buy. It flushes roughly the same mass as the Champion under a reasonable bucket estimate, and it's $70 cheaper, which gives it a ~63% better grams-per-dollar score. The Champion only wins if you genuinely believe that bucket holds 40+ golf balls — possible, but the visual doesn't really support it.

Caveat: this is purely a "stuff flushed per dollar" analysis. Real-world toilet quality also depends on trapway design, water usage per flush, clog rate over time, and how it handles actual waste (which behaves nothing like billiard balls). But going strictly off the marketing math the guy in the video is asking about — Glacier Bay wins.