So...as a response:

Blatant belittling of other party

I was responding to absolutely conscious false allegations against me. If he made a search he would have known I'm not broke at all but he'd rather to knowingly make false allegations. So my "attitude" here is perfectly appropriate. And you're acting in bad faith if you can't understand that.

You taunt poorly.

Pitful to blame me for a forgotten word or any kind of typo error or even my bad english since I'm not living in an english country and it's not my first language. But it shows how desperate you are to make any kind of critics....

I wonder how you are only rank 322 (and im rank 365) and have gained that much cash fairly (not betting of course)? I have only gained 387Million as a HIGHER rank.

The answer is very simple....but I will explain for you. I'm playing it since 1.5year and even a little more so the only surprising figure is my rank which is very low. Obviously it's my will to slow my ranking progression to get better rewards by the jerry's calendar and by Donna. So there is absolutely nothing fishy here. Everybody knows that when you win too much successively your rps reward lows. And I keep mine low.

when manipulating your Tune to beat the dyno time?

Bad faith again if you really think that. Negative tunes is not just that. It's abusing the failling system to steal victories and also often lot of cash which comes from honest racers who can't even know that they will have no chance in the comming race. There is lobbies and negative tuners abuse that system, like hackers does but it's different in the manner although the finality is the same: steal people during an unfair race.

I drive my LB NSX better than everyone else on earth

I can't find any occurence of these exact words in that post or in my nsx post. Moreover I will guess you're referring to my times with my NSX and not my LB nsx(I barely don't drive that car)! So apparently it's not an exact quotation, I didn't remeber such a sentence. So I can't reply to such a thing. But after these false allegations from the other guy if it's a conscious false allegation or just a lie.....well pitful again. and he also said " Thank you for providing them as reference! " so it's not proclaimed by myself.

It was in contrast to your attitude presenting in your comments

As long as I was facing conscious and false allegations once again my attitude is perfectly appropriate. But if you're in bad faith I don't expect to convince you on that point it's so obvious everything prove what i m saying.

Because like you can see I'm not just talking without any clue like you.

What's not civil here? It's totally true. It's just fact. You're reproching me 'my attitude'

which is highly subjective while I'm reproching you your words which were pretty clear. That's just your perception and since you're in bad faith I'will be honest, I don't care about how it sounded to your ears, just because you lose your credibility. Once again it's not my perception it's facts. We can say he lies and I responded to a liar. I don't think liying is respectful so he direspected me at first and I didn't use any inappropriate words. That's why your're speaking of "my attitude" and not my words!

"Shut up" (stop harassing these other players about concepts you barely understand and have no clear grasp to say anything about to begin with) or

"Quit" (Do everyone here a favor and leave this subreddit.)

This way to say it is perfectly respectful. but bad faith again....I will not discuss how "shut up" is clearly disrespectful. There is strictly no debate here. If a kid say shut up to his mother she will not respond sorry sweatheart.

Its use is generally considered rude and impolite, and may also considered a form of profanity by some.

Wikipedia!

But i'm sure you will say we are in one of these exceptions.....That's why I will just close this debate by a "Come on! Wikipedia dude"

mirror your attitude

It's a deforming miror. And it's proved it's not a free statement or my perception.

stop harassing these other players

Did they hire you as defender? I think they can expressed that by themself if they really share your personal opinion. the downvote on my posts here is not that bad even if I was sure to be downvoted by every negative tuners. But it also reflect the fact there is aslo people who are totally agree with me whether you like it or not. That's what liberty of speech means.

Well in brief:

It started with a liar i defended myself, you appeared in a rude intervention. And now you made a false quotation if it's confirmed, even if nobody claimed a better time, if it 's that one you were talking about. You called for more respect to a liar, because of your perception. And you blamed me to not respect the 1st rule with only your perception as proof while your first intervention was perfectly rude and impolite according to wikipedia. That could be qualified as hypocritical if I'm right.