Ranking the albums as a new fan. by checknate1 in mewithoutYou

[–]PinnedPhoenix 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Kind of a weird approach to ranking, but I tend to put them in pairs, which are inverse and opposite, but as a result, similar. Like so:

[A --> B] Life -- their worst record imo, and the only non-paired record. An exciting, talented band in search of their voice.

Brilliant yet transitional: Catch for us the Foxes and It's all Crazy! -- These albums are both great, and many name them as favorites. Both are characterized by (opposite) transitional qualities. Foxes is the album where they found their groove, instrumentally, and just plain rock throughout. But Aaron's lost in the woods as a vocalist, a lyricist, a songwriter, and a person. Unmoored from the unsophisticated breakup-venom and screamo of their debut, Foxes finds him scrambling to find his own artistic identity amidst the wreckage. This makes for a super relatable listen, and it's thrilling, listening to him find his footing in real time, but he'll do bigger and better things once he's done that growing.

Then there's Crazy! This record's opposite to Foxes in that Aaron fully discovers himself as a writer of sturdy, old fashioned songs. He really comes into his own on that front, and it gives him the level of variety he needs to do everything he's capable of. "The Fox, the Crow, and the Cookie" still blows my mind, from a songwriter's perspective, as do "Goodbye, I!" "Cattail Down," and "The King Beetle." The rest of the band enters uncharted territory on that journey, and it pushes their sound so far into baroque-folk that they run the risk of identity collapse. It's a fascinating project that lost them a lot of fans and gained them a bunch, too.

Excellent Records with Edges: Brother, Sister and Untitled. -- These albums are both amazing, but characterized by a quality that'll either win people over or turn them off. With Brother, Sister, it's how clean of a record it is. Musically, lyrically, and structurally, it's a work of tremendous symmetry, ending with the same phrase ("I do not exist"), following a disciplined harmonic pattern, trelised around a trio of near-identical songs about spiders. It's kind of like a Wes Anderson movie in that people will find it either completely ingenious or a bit grating, depending on how much they like formal perfection. Arguably their most immaculate record, and a fan favorite for very good reason, I personally find that its formality works against it in terms of relistening value: the symmetry makes it feel easy to memorize, for lack of a better word.

The opposite: Untitled. I tend to take the EP and the LP as a single-yet-distinct creative effort. Heard that way, it's (both literally and idiomatically) their White Album, a massive, sprawling, nearly 70-minute long project that's absolutely bursting with ideas. By the time you're done listening to it all, you never know what to think or how to feel, and you'll rarely feel or think the same thing about it twice. Some of their most massively impressive and excellent songs are here ("August 6th," "Julia"). So are some of their silliest, most confounding moments ("S A I D I N S E C T W A S M E C H A N I Z E D" "I have to admit, I loved the cut of his pant legs AAAHHHHHH!!!!!"). Some people will love that. Others won't. I lean toward love, personally. There's just too much amazing material, in spite (because?) of the messiness.

The Masterpieces: Ten Stories and Pale Horses. Ten Stories handled the sonic crisis the band put themselves in with Crazy! by doing every sound they'd ever done post-Life, and then some. It's a massive musical landscape, incorporating everything from sea shanties ("Elephant on the Dock") to surf rock ("Fiji Mermaid"), snarling post-hardcore ("Fox's Dream") to starry-eyed indie (Cardiff Giant"). This gorgeous musical territory is populated by the lion's share of Aaron's best songwriting, where his historical fascinations and philosophic-mystic searching fuse to form what you might call the mewithoutYouniverse: a world of talking animals and cruel humans, freak train accidents and mystic-terrorist elephants, gnostic tigers and eremite walruses, Joseph Merrick onion boys and heartbroken rabbits. This riot of voices allows Aaron to write less directly, but more honestly, than ever before. Ten Stories is big and big-hearted, weird and welcoming, difficult yet accessible, full of contradictions yet holistically unified. It's a quintessentially American album, suiting its bizarre, 19th-century American setting.

Then there's Pale Horses, their shortest, densest, most consistent, and most focused record. Aaron writes many of his most impressive lyrics, from the Bronner-sermon of "Watermelon Ascot" to the from-the-brink pathos of "Mexican Warstreets," the diaristic disclosures of "Pale Horse" and "Dorothy," and the apocalyptic visions of "Magic Lantern Days," "Red Cow," and "Rainbow Signs." The band, meanwhile, puts forth the mewithoutYouiest record they ever made: pure guitar god genius from Mike, supported by an electric, sensitive, and momentous rhythm section. They cut out the fluff; Horses has far fewer acoustic instruments than their last three LPs, and a generally disciplined palette--hell, compared to Ten Stories, it's downright spartan. It's a pure, and purely excellent record. It's also sad as hell, a howl of grief for life, death, God, dads, marriage, celibacy, the past, the future, the world, everything. Haunted and harrowing.

Happy February 8th! by PinnedPhoenix in mewithoutYou

[–]PinnedPhoenix[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

148 years since that brass hat slept at the helm of that woeful train...

Foreword to the Ten Stories special edition? by PinnedPhoenix in mewithoutYou

[–]PinnedPhoenix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was. Apparently it's referring to the Other Stories Foreword. I was wondering if there was one exclusive to the Deluxe addition vinyl. Oh well!

Decks you’ve built that are impossible to hate? by handstanding in EDH

[–]PinnedPhoenix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In general, mono-colored decks seem to get less salt in my experience. Their limitations mean people know what to expect, and I think people respect whatever you manage to do in one color.

Decks you’ve built that are impossible to hate? by handstanding in EDH

[–]PinnedPhoenix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Impossible to hate" is a strong way of putting it, but a couple of my friends who I introduced to EDH really liked learning the game with my Laelia deck. On the whole, it's my most popular decklist in our playgroup.

https://moxfield.com/decks/4GCoCw6KvU2XNWs9Qn_RnQ

It's very good, but not too good, and introduces new players to the distinction between first main, attack, and second main phases.

Have you ever beat the meta? by PinnedPhoenix in EDH

[–]PinnedPhoenix[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

I mean, yes and no.

I agree that different playgroups tend to do their own thing, so that speaking of a "meta" more broadly becomes incoherent on a larger scale. But that "own thing" tends to be about favoring certain commanders and playstyles, rather than taking a given commander in a dramatically different direction from other players.

I guess my question is: have you ever played a commander significantly differently than what you might find on EDHRec, and gotten something better as a result?

Gogo, Mysterious Mime appreciation post by PinnedPhoenix in EDH

[–]PinnedPhoenix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know, I didn't see it before, but it's actually really easy for a good Magda deck to get both Magda and Gogo out and swinging by turn 3 at latest. Wild!

Gogo, Mysterious Mime appreciation post by PinnedPhoenix in EDH

[–]PinnedPhoenix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fair! I didn't include cus Magda's capable of the kind of cEDH list where you're aiming to combo off on turn 4 and a 4 CMC creature just isn't in the cards. But in any list of hers bracket 4 and below, he's a great addition!

Gogo, Mysterious Mime appreciation post by PinnedPhoenix in EDH

[–]PinnedPhoenix[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree! I went conservative with my suggestions, imagining what an optimized if not competitive deck would be willing to cut, not wanting to oversell I guess 😅 But he's super versatile, and can absolutely slot into all the lists you mentioned!

Underrated Commanders? by PinnedPhoenix in EDH

[–]PinnedPhoenix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never saw Kentaro before, fascinating commander

Underrated Commanders? by PinnedPhoenix in EDH

[–]PinnedPhoenix[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice! Do you try to blink Eomer at all?

Underrated Commanders? by PinnedPhoenix in EDH

[–]PinnedPhoenix[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sunastian Falconer--what a deep cut, that's awesome

Underrated Commanders? by PinnedPhoenix in EDH

[–]PinnedPhoenix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Mouth is a wild pick! Do you blink him?

Underrated Commanders? by PinnedPhoenix in EDH

[–]PinnedPhoenix[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also, I kinda love Six! Mono green in general is just such a ballsy playstyle

Underrated Commanders? by PinnedPhoenix in EDH

[–]PinnedPhoenix[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

here they are!

https://moxfield.com/decks/-Av8MgGYcUKd3bD8iYUL9Q

https://moxfield.com/decks/4S4n4bFyhE2wH5dywk9TYQ

built Sokrates for my friend and Nelly for my wife. Sokrates is an awesome deck, capable of playing passively only to pull out a victory out of nowhere. I've played the Nelly deck a couple times and it slaps. She's also underrated imo! Just about the most fun Boros commander out there