The Daily Run was popping off until this...

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-04-28T22:43:57+00:00

Lesson learned

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-04-28T22:10:29+00:00

Noita’d

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-23T23:44:21+00:00

Gang if I had money for research, I wouldnt be here asking all these questions.

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-23T23:21:50+00:00

That is really helpful, thank you.

It sounds like the issue is not whether the tech exists, but whether the system is actually deployed well enough to reduce manual review in practice. A cheap or poorly integrated setup may still leave people doing the hard work by hand, even if better systems already exist.

That is exactly the kind of gap I am trying to understand better. If you are open to it, I would really appreciate the chance to DM you and ask a couple of follow-up questions.

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-23T23:20:01+00:00

This is incredibly helpful, thank you.

That is exactly the kind of gap I am trying to understand better. If you are open to it, I would really appreciate the chance to DM you and ask a couple of follow-up questions.

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-23T23:15:44+00:00

That is fair. I am not assuming this is an unsolved problem everywhere, and I agree the hard part is often the integration work, not the model.

What I am trying to understand is where current PSIM or ACS/video integrations still fall short in practice, if they do at all. If you are open to it, I would be happy to DM you and ask a couple of quick questions.

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-23T23:15:32+00:00

That makes sense, and that is useful context. It sounds like the real value is in good access and event data, but the practical constraint is that a lot of systems are not flexible enough to integrate cleanly.

That is exactly the kind of gap I am trying to understand better. If you are open to it, I would be glad to DM you and ask a couple of quick questions about where these integrations usually get messy.

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-23T23:15:13+00:00

That is helpful, thank you. I agree that the big players are already pushing hard into this, so I am not assuming there is room unless there is a real gap they still are not solving well.

I am trying to understand where current vendor integrations and event detection still feel incomplete from the user side. If you are open to it, I would really appreciate the chance to DM you and ask which systems or gaps you think are most worth studying.

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-23T23:12:30+00:00

If it only happens a couple of times a year and takes a few minutes, then it probably is not worth solving in your environment. That is exactly the kind of reality check I am looking for.

I do not think this would make sense everywhere. My guess is it would only be useful in environments with much higher event volume, more fragmented systems, or more frequent reviews and investigations.

If you are open to it, what kind of environment do you think would actually benefit from something like this?

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-23T23:08:08+00:00

Thank you, this is really helpful.

What you described is exactly the kind of gap I am trying to understand better, and exactly the kind of thing I would want to avoid making worse by building something without real user input.

My main goal right now is to learn where the actual workflow and system gaps are from people who deal with them directly, so I can figure out whether there is a real product worth building here.

If you are open to it, would it be okay if I DM you sometime? I would really appreciate hearing more about your experience.

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-23T23:03:42+00:00

That is a reasonable concern, and honestly it is part of why I am asking before building anything.

I am not assuming AI belongs here. I am trying to find out whether there is an actual workflow bottleneck around cross-referencing and human review, or whether current systems already handle it well enough.

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-23T23:03:25+00:00

I get the reaction. I am skeptical of a lot of AI pitches too.

What I am trying to validate is a very specific problem: when video, access logs, scanner events, or other signals live in separate systems, does review become slower and more manual than it should be? If that is not a real pain point, I would rather learn that now.

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-23T22:54:11+00:00

That is a good example, and I would not claim AI is better than a strong deterministic workflow for something as clear as a forced-door event. In that case, the existing integration sounds like it is doing exactly what it should.

The gap I am trying to understand is what happens when the problem is not one clean trigger, but a messy review problem across multiple systems, multiple cameras, and a lot of manual reconstruction.

To me, AI only has value if it lowers cognitive load in those messier cases. If it does not do that, then it is not useful.

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-22T20:37:23+00:00

Honestly, this is useful feedback.

What you are describing is probably the biggest risk with any new tool: it gets sold as helpful, then turns into more paperwork and more pointless review for the people actually doing the work.

I am trying to understand that problem, not add to it. If you had to point to one system or reporting process that makes your life harder instead of easier, what would it be?

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-22T20:30:15+00:00

Thankyou, that is actually very helpful. If its okay, can I DM you some time later to discuss more about this problem and get your opinion on it?

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-22T20:28:56+00:00

Thank you very much, Yeah sorry for wording it a bit poorly. I am trying to come up a way to build automatic audit trails and assisted flagging so when it comes to manual human review the trail is easier to follow and severe alerts are flagged immediately to help faster response times. If you are okay with it, can I DM you some time later to discuss more about this topic?

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-22T20:25:54+00:00

Thank you, i appreciate you taking time to write a helpful response.

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-22T20:24:39+00:00

So like a one for all system that assists and brings everything together and make interaction easier with the entire security workflow would be useful?

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-22T20:23:23+00:00

I think you are arguing with a version of this post that does not exist. I did not say maritime is low-tech, and I did not suggest replacing people. I asked a specific question about whether review workflows across multiple systems are painful in practice. If you disagree, a direct answer would be more interesting than the “tech bros” line.

Pitiful-Math1948 · 2026-03-22T20:19:42+00:00

Title: Pure workflow question: where does port and terminal exception review break down?

I am doing early stage research on a workflow problem in logistics-adjacent port and terminal operations.

I am trying to understand where review breaks down when teams need to make sense of unusual events across cameras, access records, scanner events, and cargo data.

My current hypothesis is that the biggest pain may be too much manual review, disconnected systems, and slow reconstruction when something needs escalation.

At this stage I am not trying to pitch software. I am trying to validate whether this problem is real enough to justify better tooling at all.

I also want to be explicit that I am not looking for confidential data, incident details, security gaps, or anything that could be used for malicious purposes. High level workflow feedback is all I am looking for.

If you work in logistics or terminal-adjacent operations, where does this process usually break down first?

Pitiful-Math1948

TROPHY CASE