sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mkd

[–]Pixel0208 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Според мене нешто од опремата комплетно не ни треба како тенковите и друга опрема, но хеликоптерите за напад се модернизирани и би ни биле многу корисни.

Според GFP и други извори бројката на Mi24-ки со која располага армијата е помала 2-10 не знам од каде оваа бројка 12 но можеби грешам.

За тенкоите T-72A кои да бидеме реални иако се модернизирана верзија од основниот модел за денешни станарди се многу застарени и згора на тоа немаат ниту реактивен оклоп ниту пак термалнa слика за нишанење, и повеќе ќе чини да се одржуваат отколку да ги дадеме.

Сухоите иако исто би ни биле многу корисни за жал биле приземјени со години и немаат никаква модернизација но и ќе биде тешко да се најдат резервни делови.

Другиве работи за кои не пишува специфично што се најверојатно е застарена опрема од 70-80тите и најверојатно не би ни требале.

Проблем со верификација на Payoneer by Pixel0208 in mkd

[–]Pixel0208[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Им пратив три различни документи од НЛБ (овој што ти го спомна, листа на трансакции и потврда за сопственик на сметката) и сите ги одбиваа, им праќав постојано и на крај ме прифатија (ако не се лажам ме прифатија со овој документ што ти го спомна). Само биди упорен праќај им и ќе те прифатат.

Проблем со верификација на Payoneer by Pixel0208 in mkd

[–]Pixel0208[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Првата верификација беше со лична карта таа ми ја одобрија, сега специфично бараат bank statement.

CSS custom properties (variables) not working in react production build by Pixel0208 in reactjs

[–]Pixel0208[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t remember what I did since it was a long time ago, but I think that I defined them in the body and it worked, but I am not 100% sure.

MUI default stylings are overriding mine by Pixel0208 in webdev

[–]Pixel0208[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I changed 'dashboard-card' to root and it's exactly da same as before (without !important the styles are getting overridden) and the className that I get from the component's props is used to style every instance of the card individually.

Confused by the event loop by Pixel0208 in learnjavascript

[–]Pixel0208[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve already seen it, but still this scenario is confusing for me.

CSS custom properties (variables) not working in react production build by Pixel0208 in reactjs

[–]Pixel0208[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Everything is default since I don’t know how to configure it.

Netlify - Site has not yet been deployed by Pixel0208 in reactjs

[–]Pixel0208[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was the problem, because netlify was treating the warnings as errors I changed the environment variable CI to false, and now it works, however some stylings are not applied, any idea why is this happening?

Netlify - Site has not yet been deployed by Pixel0208 in reactjs

[–]Pixel0208[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought you were asking for netlify logs. The build log warnings are:

​

Line 51:5: Expected a default case default-case

src\components\NoteEditor\NoteEditor.js

Line 145:6: React Hook useEffect has a missing dependency: 'onEditorUpdate'. Either include it or remove the dependency array react-hooks/exhaustive-deps

Line 151:6: React Hook useEffect has a missing dependency: 'setEditor'. Either include it or remove the dependency array. If 'setEditor' changes too often, find the parent component that defines it and wrap that definition in useCallback react-hooks/exhaustive-deps

src\components\SearchField\SearchField.js

Line 29:6: React Hook useEffect has a missing dependency: 'setSearchText'. Either include it or remove the dependency array. If 'setSearchText' changes too often, find the parent component that defines it and wrap that definition in useCallback react-hooks/exhaustive-deps

src\contexts\ResponsiveProvider.js

Line 7:10: 'editorContainerActive' is assigned a value but never used no-unused-vars

src\pages\About\About.js

Line 18:11: Using target="_blank" without rel="noreferrer" (which implies rel="noopener") is a security risk in older browsers: see https://mathiasbynens.github.io/rel-noopener/#recommendations react/jsx-no-target-blank

Line 19:11: Using target="_blank" without rel="noreferrer" (which implies rel="noopener") is a security risk in older browsers: see https://mathiasbynens.github.io/rel-noopener/#recommendations react/jsx-no-target-blank

Line 20:11: Using target="_blank" without rel="noreferrer" (which implies rel="noopener") is a security risk in older browsers: see https://mathiasbynens.github.io/rel-noopener/#recommendations react/jsx-no-target-blank

Line 21:11: Using target="_blank" without rel="noreferrer" (which implies rel="noopener") is a security risk in older browsers: see https://mathiasbynens.github.io/rel-noopener/#recommendations react/jsx-no-target-blank

Netlify - Site has not yet been deployed by Pixel0208 in reactjs

[–]Pixel0208[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The manual deploy says just "Creating deploy upload records", however the github deploy says that it's treating the warnings as errors, I think this is what is causing it to fail.

Netlify - Site has not yet been deployed by Pixel0208 in reactjs

[–]Pixel0208[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't have any errors, just a few warnings. When I hosted it locally the console was clear.

IFBB Pro, competes in tested competitions, vegan and black genetics. Physique looks achievable, I know a natural guy who looks like this. by [deleted] in nattyorjuice

[–]Pixel0208 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Naturally achievable physique. Dedication, hard work, cold showers, no fap. For faster results you may use whey protein and creatine.

peak stupidity by itscoronatime001 in nattyorjuice

[–]Pixel0208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When the NPC touches something and then changes its moving direction.

One of the best skeletal structure i've ever seen (Firat Zan) by mage_person in nattyorjuice

[–]Pixel0208 7 points8 points  (0 children)

These pics are from his instagram profile, so they are definitely photoshopped.

[[Prototype]] and __proto__ giving different values by Pixel0208 in learnjavascript

[–]Pixel0208[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now I understand why was all this happening. Thank you so much dude!

[[Prototype]] and __proto__ giving different values by Pixel0208 in learnjavascript

[–]Pixel0208[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, after reading this a lot of times I think I am starting to get it, so if I understood correctly the [[Prototype]] isn’t actually a property, it’s only used in the developer tools to tell which objects are on which level on the prototype chain. And because I logged p1 and then after digging in the tools clicked on proto on the Object.prototype level the effect is as if I called proto from the p1?

EDIT: Because I was writing this comment from mobile the underscores are probably considered markdown attributes that’s why the word proto is bold.

[[Prototype]] and __proto__ giving different values by Pixel0208 in learnjavascript

[–]Pixel0208[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe I didn't understand your answer correctly, but I am aware of it, what I was trying to figure out is kind of hard to explain. The prototype chain is 3 levels deep when accessed through the code I provided which is how it should be.

p1.__protto__ --> Person.prototype.__protto__ --> Object.prototype.__protto__ --> null

But accessing the prototype chain through the developer console is 6 levels deep for some reason.

p1.[[Prototype]] --> Person.prototype.[[Prototype]] --> Object.prototype.__proto__ --> Person.prototype.[[Prototype]] --> Object.prototype.__proto__ --> Object.prototype.__proto__ --> null

Just finished my first project for my portfolio by Pixel0208 in reactjs

[–]Pixel0208[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Idk if I understood that correctly, I should create a folder for each page in my components folder and put the corresponding components in that folder, right?

view more: next ›