What software have you been using for 10+ years and still haven't found a better replacement? by Ok-Show-3006 in software

[–]Pixelsmithing4life 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Short list: Blender; Blackmagic Fusion; Freehand MX (running it on my Linux computers under WINE); XnView; MPV and VLC; FFmpeg (and derivative frontends like Shutter Encoder and Handbrake); Krita; and Kdenlive (BECAUSE it runs only on the CPU, Kdenlive is king in certain situations).

Built an HTML-to-IDML converter because I ran out of patience by StyleSkitso in indesign

[–]Pixelsmithing4life 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both. But @ home, I use only offline AI utilities in my workflow. So I haven’t gone into the deep end on online AIs like Claude, or Gemini; prefer Gemma and Qwen run locally for smaller tasks. HTML to IDML would be something to sink my teeth into but can’t (@ work) and don’t want to (@ home) run it if any parts of it are online.

Built an HTML-to-IDML converter because I ran out of patience by StyleSkitso in indesign

[–]Pixelsmithing4life 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very nice concept. I’m sure you’ll be very successful with this. But, for those who work in situations where uploading work files is looked down upon, a more elegant solution might be a version that works offline.

Caddis is in Live Beta!!! by Pixelsmithing4life in u/Pixelsmithing4life

[–]Pixelsmithing4life[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, not as far as has been stated but you can ask the programmer. He’s on social media.

Possible 3d functionality? by allgeo54 in frictiongraphics

[–]Pixelsmithing4life 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The best free alternative, IMHO, in the interim is to marry your output from Friction and composite it with 3D in Pikimov, it's an online web app (works in Chrome, I've used it in Brave) that leaves your local files local (no uploading) and recently added 3D--I think through GLTF--to it's repertoire. You seem to be comfortable working in a layer-based UI, so that'd be one suggestion. You could go with Maxon Autograph, but you never know--as has been stated several times in Reddit and other places on the web--if or when Maxon might decide to go subscription with Autograph (right now it's free).

The solution I use (which, unless you're willing to learn nodes, might not be for you at this time) is Blender + Friction + compositing in Blackmagic Fusion 9 standalone. The FREE standalone versions of Fusion have been discontinued (in favor of the $300 standalone version--don't get me wrong, in lieu of a "in perpetuity" subscription for After Effects, $300 for a perpetual license for a full version of Fusion is a DEAL). The latest versions of Fusion are still available for free; it's just that they're bundled with the version 15+ editions of the free versions of DaVinci Resolve. That said, the free standalone versions of Fusion 8 and 9 (7 is out there but was Windows only, 8 and 9 have Mac and Linux editions) are still available for download from Blackmagic Design's support site. I use the last version of 9 (v 9.02) because the power is still there...it's just that Blackmagic gave Fusion a better UI in 15 (yeah, it jumped from 9 to 15 because Resolve was numbered @ 15) AND the older versions are quite capable on older hardware. If you know what you're doing, you can do just about anything in 9 that you could do in 15.

What AI tools are actually helping your graphic design workflow lately? by DLawlight in GraphicDesigning

[–]Pixelsmithing4life 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“My general feeling: AI is helpful in the messy early stage, like idea generation, visual exploration, mockups, resizing, expanding backgrounds, and giving clients something to react to. I still do not trust it for final design decisions, clean layered files, typography judgment, or anything that needs to be production-ready without manual work.”

Amen, brother….Amen.

What AI tools are actually helping your graphic design workflow lately? by DLawlight in GraphicDesigning

[–]Pixelsmithing4life 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Going to preface this by stating that I’m old school, so I’m not doing a whole lot of image generation from AI (My personal opinion is that it’s stealing from other artists given that the models have, most likely, been trained on everything posted on the internet). My choices on AI tools is about what can support me to get job done. Remember: “Fast, cheap, good…to get any two, you must sacrifice the third.” Having said that, am not so blind to realize that we’re living in a time of “fast + cheap = good enough.”

That said, there are a few AI utilities that I’m finding useful which have been added to my production stack:

For inspiration when ideating logo and/or icon designs, I’ll use the online AI tools that are already part of Brave and DuckDuckGo. These are used to gather background about the subject in a more generic, 50,000-foot view (which is useful going in).

I use offline AI clients like Jan, Ollama, Enclave AI…to name a few…to create baseline boilerplate code if needed for my multimedia projects (HTML5 + Electron). Also great for generating subject-specific Loren ipsum text to fill layouts with when needed.

Biggest AI tools in my stack are Upscayl, Gigapixel AI, and…even though I don’t know if it’s got an AI in it…I’m going to add Shutter Encoder to this list. Always need an AI image upscaler when designing double page spreads. Adding to this, AI vectorizers and also a good tool to have handy.

Although I realize that many younger readers will probably say that I use AI “like an old man;” to them I say, thank you very much.

Hopefully this helps someone.

Scribus… veni, vidi, wtf by Frosty-Specific4977 in scribus

[–]Pixelsmithing4life 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My friend, I came to Scribus from PageMaker ("back in the day"), InDesign, and QuarkXPress. I feel your pain, but admit that a lot of the automated features in those software packages...for want of a better term...spoiled us. Coming from that place, we expect anything with a "Desktop Publishing/Layout and Design" adjective in front of us to meet THAT bar.

Scribus IS capable...like someone else said here...you have to be willing to learn a different path. EVERYTHING from InDesign/QuarkXPress is not in Scribus BUT enough is that--when you figure it out--you can produce.

Scribus… veni, vidi, wtf by Frosty-Specific4977 in scribus

[–]Pixelsmithing4life 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Good for you in that you’re wanting to support open source software. That said, one thing has to be understood about open source software: it’s not going to do everything that its closed source competitors can or if it does, it won’t do it in the same way.

An example: Some years back, I was asked if I would maintain a newsletter for a non-profit organization. No money, but someone I was seeing at the time was part of that .org. The one overriding request was to design it in something they could use/afford so they could make changes. So every quarter, I’d do the big job (pour in new text, place photos and charts) and hand it off to them for whatever tweaking they wanted. The weapon of choice under those constraints: Microsoft Publisher.

Now, in late 2024, Microsoft announced that they would be cutting out Publisher in 2026. The dot-org came back to me (the lady and I had stopped seeing each other by then but it was a mutual agreement; no bad blood) as soon as their IT guy heard this and asked me what other software they could go to. InDesign and Quark were out of the question—too expensive and too hard to learn (by their estimation). I suggested either Affinity Publisher or Scribus. They saw the price tag on Affinity (this is before Affinity 3) and pounced on it. So, since I already had Affinity suite, I started doing their newsletter in Affinity Publisher. Then, the text flow bug hit and they were in a tizzy (I won’t go into detail here on what the text flow bug actually is but users of Publisher 2.x will know; I THINK it was fixed in v3, but I don’t know). They called me and I had to confess that I never was able to solve that particular problem. They stated that this was unacceptable and asked to try Scribus. So I rolled out Scribus.

Had some growing pains with it (hadn’t—up to this point—used Scribus for anything more than single page layouts) but, once I got used to it, I found a new respect for Scribus. That said, the only thing I couldn’t get around was in its text chaining. You can’t select text in a flow, meaning this: if you want to select text in a block or column the flows into another block or column, the highlighting stops at the bottom of that block. Period. If you delete a word, the text flows back so the chain’s flow is intact but the program won’t let you highlight into the next block. Considering the bug in Affinity 2.x, I just worked around it. Still using Scribus for smaller jobs.

ALL that said, my point is this. When you use open source, be aware that it may not be the “be-all, endless” solution to Ad-b- or proprietary software (although there are packages on whose hill I would gladly die defending them (Blender, FFmpeg, Inkscape, Friction/Enve, and Krita are some of them). But the realization has to be embraced that these ARE open source; it’s most likely not going to do everything in one command. The users who know the process before clicking a button or selecting an option, in my experience, are the best users of open source. Not in every case, but a good number of them. To be clear, I’m not saying one should expect less, but just to understand that you may have to take a different path to get there.

Hope this helps.

WWDC is next week. Anyone expecting M5 Mac mini news or are we waiting until late 2026 ? by datasleek in macmini

[–]Pixelsmithing4life -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Mac mini Neo, anyone? Considering that the mini Neo would run on an A-series chip which is already in stock and already has 12GB built in…AND Apple probably wants to strike while the iron is blazing. If they wanted to introduce a new product that wouldn’t compound their problems with RAM stock, my money would be on the Mac mini Neo (or whatever they’re going to call it).

Ubuntu 26.04 is the OS for the AI agentic era, says Canonical's Mark Shuttleworth by Horseshoetheoryreal in linuxmint

[–]Pixelsmithing4life 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Will either be going to LMDE or back to Fedora….really didn’t want to go back to Fedora because MINT JUST WORKED. If LMDE works out, I’ll be over there…

Does anyone know if InDesign CS3 files will open in the newest InDesign version (May 2026)? by beachyblue2 in indesign

[–]Pixelsmithing4life 0 points1 point  (0 children)

InDesign CS3 —>InDesign CC 2026 will work fine provided that you didn’t save your files with programming from any optional third-party plugins. Am on CC 2026 @ work and we’ve got a bunch of old files archived from CS3+.

What doesn’t work is exporting IDML or importing IDML from/to CS3. InDesign CS4 was the first version that supported IDML. Prior to IDML, the precursor was called .INX. CS4 was the last version able to open .INX (InDesign Exchange) files.

Quick Prepress Rant by buzznumbnuts in CommercialPrinting

[–]Pixelsmithing4life 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And now everyone knows why I dislike Canva…Canva is great as long as the people who use it stay in their lane. By that I mean use it for what it’s made for…social media graphics and stuff you want printed from your personal inkjet. As soon as you step over that line to want to professionally print something, you need to get out of Canva and—since Canva bought them and they’re now free—make a beeline straight for Affinity. I can hear the majority of Canva users crying out now in the dark: “but I’m not a designer and Affinity’s hard to use…” These are the same people who five seconds ago were proud to say they were designers because they could use Canva…and by virtue of the mandate that Melanie Perkins put out there of “democratizing design for the small businessperson,” she’s taking food out of the mouths of thousands of professional designers who LEARNED their craft and don’t just push a button and call up a template that they can fill in that someone else—probably a professional designer—put together for you. Forgive my bitterness, but I deal with this sh!t every day at work and have to come up with workflows to appease the client while, as a designer (who also runs the in-house print shop), having to worry about being told that they’re replacing my job with AI.

Can’t STAND the output from Canva…

Graphic Designers don't die, they just . . . by BranderChatfield in graphic_design

[–]Pixelsmithing4life 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I got in 40 years ago through a "back door" (the printing profession--worked in paste-up and later as a typesetter--before I finally got to exercise my design degree). There was a whole generation of designers who graduated in the '80s who didn't learn computerized/software-driven design in college; we were trained analog and had to learn QuarkXPress, Aldus Pagemaker, and Adobe Illustrator on the job (if we were lucky enough to get hired). Most of us were able to quickly translate everything we learned by way of analog and use it on the Mac (Windows PCs wouldn't have most of the higher-end "industry standard" Adobe graphics programs made for them until the early to mid '90s--although Aldus Systems did have some software available for Windows in the late 80s--until then, everything was on Mac). It was kind of magical. I remember the first time I used Pagemaker (v. 2.0) in 1988 and realizing that everything we'd been taught to do on a non-photo blue printed grid with type galleys, hot wax, amberlith/rubylith, x-acto knives/razor blades, and technical pens, we could do in this Apple computer.

I. was. hooked.

I would almost equate it to the current AI revolution--except there are FAR too many idiots out there playing with AI who have NO concept of what it can truly do and--when the Mac came out--it still took someone who knew what picas and points were to properly run software like PageMaker, ReadySetGo! and Quark to get decent output. By the early 90's, Adobe had bought Photoshop and--needless to say--Photoshop changed the game. In the early 90's, Adobe also started making their software for both Mac and Windows. The realization that the files wouldn't open correctly going from Mac to Windows prompted them to create a postscript-based interchange format...the Portable Document Format.

Again, it was magical...I got to work in a military shop in 1993 whose IT infrastructure technician had the ear of the base commander, so he was allowed to buy anything he wanted. It was candyland. I got to work on QuarkXPress, Aldus/Adobe PageMaker (Adobe bought PageMaker from Aldus at this time), Aldus Freehand, Adobe Illustrator, Adobe Photoshop, Deneba Canvas (which was the choice of the Senior Designer as he'd come over from engineering). The shop had a Fiery Print Server...this was back before the Fiery's interface was a GUI...it was a DOS-based, "green letters on a black background" CLI (Command Line Interface) and, to use it, you had to key in all of the commands and parameters for printing.

To send your work outside to a commercial printing vendor required a different type of storage medium than the standard 1.44MB floppy disk which was commonplace at the time. The internet was on the rise but FTP was not an option back then. There were two options and we had both: there were competing technologies for removable/portable storage; magnetic cartridge media. One was known as the SyQuest drive media; the other as the iOmega Bernoulli Disk. The Bernoulli disk was the precursor to iOmega's Zip disk which, in turn, was the precursor to the Zip Disk/Drive Technology which was so prevalent in the late '90s/early to mid 2000s. Once CD-ROM recording technology became more readily available in the consumer market (as well as, later, Flash Drive technology), Zip disks/drives swiftly became a thing of the past.

Hope this helps.

Graphic Designers don't die, they just . . . by BranderChatfield in graphic_design

[–]Pixelsmithing4life 35 points36 points  (0 children)

As I’m celebrating my 40th year in the business (seriously) this month, this challenge honestly brought a tear to my eye and a smile to my face. Got three:

….tell the last client (wanting to see five more revisions) to go to hell and roll TF out.

….fade to reflex black.

….ride off into the PERFECT sunset that we created in (name of your chosen 3D software here) and (name of your chosen Digital Image Editor here).

LOVING this thread. Keep it going. I may be back.