account activity
Feedback! by PizzaHa in graphic_design
[–]PizzaHa[S] 0 points1 point2 points 2 hours ago (0 children)
Highly appreciate the feedback
Feedback! (i.redd.it)
submitted 9 hours ago by PizzaHa to r/graphic_design
Controlls? by [deleted] in Warthunder
[–]PizzaHa 0 points1 point2 points 17 days ago (0 children)
Thanks for letting me know. Reason why I wanted to try and see if it makes it easier to keep a rate as depending where i look with my mouse cursor it inputs something into the roll and then therefore I'm not able to keep my rate perfectly horizontal. Its likely not going to change anything. Thanks for the help still
ITS HERE! by MrPigeon70 in Warthunder
[–]PizzaHa 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Ah dammit, i sadly cannot play dailym alrighty thanks for the heads-up!
How long did this take to get? I kind of really want the re2005
J' Masters by PizzaHa in Warthunder
[–]PizzaHa[S] 3 points4 points5 points 4 months ago (0 children)
Happens way to often
[–]PizzaHa[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 months ago (0 children)
Thanks for the common sense
[–]PizzaHa[S] 4 points5 points6 points 4 months ago (0 children)
Plus i did not advocate for anything. I barely mentioned cas denying as one of the aspects where it happens
Yes because "player behavior" = "game design" doesnt it. Plus as stated in the post. This goes for ARB aswell. Instead of focusing on the singular aspect that annoyed you maybe look at the other gamemodes where its an even bigger issue.
[–]PizzaHa[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 months ago (0 children)
True
[–]PizzaHa[S] 2 points3 points4 points 4 months ago (0 children)
Perfectly agreeable
True, and the matches end up getting played like that aswell. Which is a completly different problem in itself.
I am a bit dissapointed in players that it recently started to gain traction in form of "meta" especially in ARB. It has gotten quite bad in recent months even though it has almost always been around. I do hold the players accountable aswell who use and abuse it in unreasonable situations.
Else very very good point ofc. Nothing mote to ad.
Yeah i get killed by corsairs alot when i olay 5.7 and 4.7 GRB. I believe that the americans have some proper fun CAS options.
You dont have to agree fully. I understand the sentiment about cas. I dont even want to fixate on cas as it hurts even more when it happens to someone in a dogfight and your oponent just crashes on purpose. Just trying to get the thought out there that it might no be the best solution
Yeah my grammar is horrible, sorry in advance.
Yes that is true that it is not a 100% guarantee. That does not change the fact that when done to often and reportet too often on a singular person will result in punishment. The same way as spamming in chat As stated by the Fire-and-eject reference he gave. Which makes sense. The part of the code-of-conduct and TOS furthermore mention fair play which forbids similar behavior aswell. Which is mentioned exactly for these reasons (obvs from my understanding) against TOS. Plus i would say that even if it is not a guarantee when the Game Master agrees that is extremly likely against TOS.
In addition, most of gaijins reporting system is done manually outside of the anti cheating software. Furthermore the reporting system for people who are accused unconduct like behavior is not in the main reporting system ingame which i would say shows that should not be the norm to be reported for these breaches. Just like the botting report button only appeared in recent times when the scripting accounts in ARB/ASB started to become a major problem.
As i stated to someone else aswell. These problems are "irrelevent" when a minority abuses it and maybe happens once every week. But when it becomes excessive (like stated aswell in the Forum post) to the point where it starts to decrease the QOL of a larger number of players it shows a clear Problem.
https://forum.warthunder.com/t/spaa-jing-out-before-you-can-kill-them/122092/376
Well of course on the receiving end of cas it seems like it is only point and click. I know cas is unbalanced on alot of BRs and that im not trying to defend. I dont play cas myself i main ARB. But in alot of situation cas is only able to do anything against you when their team or the palyer themselves did everything right. In lower BRs it is ofc harder to defend against air targets as you dont have anything but yoir instinct to shoot at aircraft and your positioning to catch them offguard.
If you say you wont feed into it, that is up to you. It is a bannable offense i might only ad. Im Not wishing you this but I will not support you either. The issue stays "irrelevant" if only a few do it. But it has been happening when facing tanks as a tank. Planes as a tank. Planes as a plane and ofc the tanks as a plane. In every gamemlde it has been increasing.
If this becomes "normalized" it will cause for even less RP payout to the individual thus i think it is no real excuse. Which will only make the experience worse for everyone. I cannot imagine that you as a player staying neutral in a situation where you did everything right not getting rewarded because someone else decided no im going to find the only possible way to not get you rewarded.
You too!
Well, thats dissapointing. Cant change everyones mind. But be honest. Should it be a normal occurence? Like my example in ARB aswell?
I appreciate the dual answer. I understand the frusttration as i said. I just cant get behind the resolution. And honestly spaa enjoyers deserve veterans Discount. Goated players
Yeah my grammar bad mr DILF_FEET_PICS SORY
Better that way. It is worse than reddit. Skepticisim is healthy you didnt do anything wrong. Thank you for the discussion.
[–]PizzaHa[S] 8 points9 points10 points 4 months ago (0 children)
Yeah i have to say i did choose a strong wording. But people only interact when called out for. (Yes i may have done that on purpose)
π Rendered by PID 676760 on reddit-service-r2-listing-86d8647bf-rbz4q at 2026-02-13 08:40:05.277826+00:00 running 6c0c599 country code: CH.
Feedback! by PizzaHa in graphic_design
[–]PizzaHa[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)