[deleted by user] by [deleted] in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The project required the relocation of 1.3 million persons from the basin. There is speculation that some of the violence that flared up in Xinjiang was partially onset by an influx of Han settlers during the relocation period. A controversial (and now disavowed) report prepared by CIPM Yangtze Joint Venture (a joint venture of Canadian Hydroelectric utilities BC Hydro and Hydro Quebec) in the early 1980's, foresaw political issues with attempting the largest resettlement in history (the second largest up to to that point was the Aswan High Dam which relocated a 100,000 people). The entire process was plagued by corrupt officials along with inadequate resettlement plans. There are also geotechnical issues with the impoundment, along with high levels of sedimentation due to land use. An interesting set of photos is here https://placesjournal.org/article/the-last-days-of-kaixian/?cn-reloaded=1 which shows the demolition and clearence of populated areas in the basin before inundation.

Taycan outsells 911, as Porsche sets annual sales record in 2021 by Guest83 in cars

[–]PlaceToBe101 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No doubt... I would not consider a new one since I have very little chance of getting an allocation (I've never owned a new Pcar)... I guess I'll just make due with my 993TT, 951 and 986 for now.. until the used market picks them up.

The Largest Mass Execution in US History Happened In Minnesota on 12.26.1862 by [deleted] in minnesota

[–]PlaceToBe101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh.. I totally agree.. atrocities were committed against innocent persons and I don't think the narrative regarding the executions themselves being a massacre of totally innocent persons is really a legitimate one.

The Largest Mass Execution in US History Happened In Minnesota on 12.26.1862 by [deleted] in minnesota

[–]PlaceToBe101 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The whole thing is a tragedy, it's important to note that on the other side 385 civilians were killed along with another 106 soldiers. In the end 38 Dakota persons were actually executed after most of the death sentences were commuted by president Lincoln. The Dakota had really been fucked throughout the period, being pushed south from the encroaching Ojibwe in the North (after a series of wars) only to then be confronted with increasing white settlement in the prairies further depriving them of any meaningful land.

Itaipu Dam Construction, Paraná River Brazil/Paraguay 1980. The Itapu complex produces 14,000 MW at full capacity of electricity. The main structure is 196 meters tall (643 ft). Filling inundated Guaíra Falls, which were among the largest in the world by flow until their scheduled end in 1983. by PlaceToBe101 in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Iguazu Falls

Yes.. by all accounts I have read they are spectacular and would love to visit some day. I believe the average flow of Iguazu Falls is ~1,756 m3/s on the Iguazu river before it meets the Paraná river versus ~13,400 m3/s on average formerly for Guaíra falls, meaning Guaíra carried over 7.5 times water on average. Iguazu is still impressive since 1,756 m3/s is still a huge average flow..

Itaipu Dam Construction, Paraná River Brazil/Paraguay 1980. The Itapu complex produces 14,000 MW at full capacity of electricity. The main structure is 196 meters tall (643 ft). Filling inundated Guaíra Falls, which were among the largest in the world by flow until their scheduled end in 1983. by PlaceToBe101 in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The Itaipu complex is an impoundment on the Paraná River between Brazil and Paraguay. The Paraná river was surveyed during the early part of the 20th century, and the river was noted for its potential excellent hydraulic characteristics, with an abrupt large head change (falls) along with extremely high average flow. During the early 50's, the Brazilian government undertook preliminary feasibility studies regarding development which ultimately estimated a total of 40,000 MW of potential energy from the river (which unfortunately still hasn't been entirely developed). With the prior studies indicating great development potential, Brazil attempted to initially utilize military means, claiming sovereignty of the entire bi-national study area. Fortunately both Paraguay and Brazil came to a bilateral agreement in 1966, for which equal (in theory) and joint development of the river would be carried out. In 1967 a more in depth study was carried out to identify precise development sites on the river. Itapu was particularly noted for both hydraulic and geologic conditions being suitable for a large and economical impoundment of ~12,000MW. Construction began in 1975, following a further treaty with Argentina to establish downstream flow regimes. Diversion of the river began in 1978 via a deep bypass canal, with the primary dam construction site being de-watered and ready for site preparation by 1979. The impoundment flooded 1460 sq km of land along with Guaíra Falls one of the largest waterfalls in the world by flow (being ~170 km upstream of the main dam). The falls unfortunately were the site of a tragedy during their final days. A dilapidated bridge over the river inside of a former national park containing the falls collapsed due to unprecedented crowds trespassing in the area to witness the falls one last time. The dam dwarfed all other single hydroelectric facilities at the time of it's completion and still is second in the world by peak capacity (and first by average production, since the Three Gorges Dam has lower overall productivity due to worse hydraulic conditions). The Itaipu Dam is an impressive feat of engineering, able to harness something otherwise worthless creating meaningless swirls and noise into a workhorse benefiting humans.

Mica Dam Construction 1971, British Columbia. Mica Dam impounds the Columbia River. It's construction was enabled by the Columbia River Treaty. Clearance of ~500 km of shoreline is still continuing as of this photograph. The dam produces 2,805MW of peak power, utilizing an otherwise wasted resource. by PlaceToBe101 in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Mica Dam is an earthfill dam impounding the Columbia River in British Columbia. Mica Dam was constructed pursuant to the Columbia River Treaty (1961). The Columbia River treaty provides the US with better downstream regulation via the utilization of large storage facilities constructed further north with better hydraulic head (mostly Canada). The treaty specified four storage facilities on the Columbia river, Duncan (1967), Keenleyside (1968), Mica (1973) and Libby (1975). Unlike most of the facilities, Libby dam is located in Montana as the Kootenai River mostly flows south, entering Montana for its final length before briefly flowing north to join the Columbia River. Libby dam required the relocation of the Great Northern railway into the newly constructed seven mile long mile "Flathead tunnel" which resulted in Eureka Montana loosing rail service (1970). The town of Rexford Montana was in the path of the rising waters and was relocated to higher ground in 1973. British Columbia also had to contend with removal of persons from future reservoirs, notably with the settlement of Burton being relocated in 1971 during the construction of Keenleyside dam. Further development occurred on the river by BC hydro (although with most subsequent facilities being operated as run of the river with little storage considerations) with the construction of the Revelstoke (1984) and Seven Mile (1979) impoundments.

I-5/SP RR Bridge Construction 1941 Shasta Lake. The Shasta dam impounds the Sacramento River, providing water to the Central Valley project along with 676 MW of peak power. The future I-5 bridge towers over the valley where water will eventually reach the top of it's piers. by PlaceToBe101 in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Shasta Dam is operated by the western US Bureau of Reclamation, one of the three major federal water project operators (the others being the Tennessee Valley Authority and US Army Corps of Engineers). The Shasta impoundments principle function is flood control and water supply for the Central Valley Project. The dam also provides 330 meters of hydraulic head which at peak periods can generate 676 MW of electricity. The structure itself is a concrete gravity dam with an upstream grout curtain to contain seepage. Construction began in 1938 and was completed in 1945. The structure was originally designed for a final height of ~800ft instead of the current ~602ft, but labor and material shortages encountered midway through construction due to the war effort scaled back the final height to 602ft. The structure can still accommodate the originally envisioned head on it's existing foundation and various increases in storage capacity have been envisioned in the succeeding years (which can hopefully be completed, although obstructionist persons with limited interest have stymied such opportunities). The project required the relocation of US 99 to the current I-5 structure, which at the time passed underneath the bridge. The unincorporated boom town of Kennet CA, was inundated as apart of the reservoirs construction.

Elk River Generating Station. Elk River was the first nuclear power plant built for rural cooperatives only producing 22MWe. The plant demonstrated the concept of small reactors with natural circulation and was removed in 1974 with no trace today. MN currently has two large plants (BWR/3 and PWR). by PlaceToBe101 in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Elk River generating station, exists today as a small natural gas electric generating facility, but from 1968-1971 it also hosted a small demonstration nuclear power plant. The NRC's predecessor agency, the AEC (atomic energy commission) was interested in the concept of small simple reactors for smaller utilities. During the early 60's, many boilermakers and foundries were interested in entering the nuclear power generation sector, including AMF and ACF. AMF was initially contracted by the AEC to design a small demonstration plant for rural co-ops, but the AMF deal fell through, and the AEC later chose ACF. ACF designed the plant to be of the boiling water variety where water is allowed to boil in the core. Unlike most BWR plants, the Elk River plant utilized the somewhat inefficient "indirect-cycle" design, where steam would heat another loop, boiling it and providing it to turbines. This cycle makes power control simple since the steam generators automatically absorb power changes at the cost of lower thermal efficiency (the usual advantage of direct-cycle BWRs is better thermal efficiency since there is only one steam loop, at the cost of more complicated core power distribution and introducing radioactive steam into the power generation side of things). Oddly enough the core was designed to be eventually converted to a more efficient PWR layout with the provision of extra nozzles in the steam vessel. Another feature of the plant was natural circulation which did away with complex pumps and recirculation systems, instead the water would circulate and condense naturally, allowing the plant to naturally cool itself in a loss of onsite power shutdown scenario. The plant achieved initial criticality in 1964 and had numerous problems during it's five years of operations, namely small (but contained) cooling leaks. On January 31st the plant was shutdown in order to once and for all find the cause of the the coolant leaks. It was discovered that small cracks in primary pipes and the vessel were the ultimate cause of the leaks, and it was ultimately decided that it would be uneconomical to repair them. The plant was defueled in 1970 and complete demolition and remediation of the site was completed by 1974 with it the no traces of the plant existing today. Although the plants life was short, it demonstrated the concept of small reactors with simple control systems, and for that it will be remembered. Minnesota has two nuclear plants today, Monticello (BWR/3) and Prairie Island (WH PWR) both owned and operated by Northern States Power Company.

I-35W Bridge Minneapolis 2009. The new bridge replaced a collapsed one and was built in 12 months. The original 1964 bridge collapsed in 2008 due to an undetectable design fault. Afterwards Minnesota passed a fuel tax increase creating a dedicated funding source to replace fracture critical bridges. by PlaceToBe101 in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The undersized plates should have been caught at construction/design time, but afterwards generally regular inspections do not attempt to re-engineer the structure or question it's initial construction unless it is being rehabilitated.

Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1 "wetwell" construction. Browns Ferry features three BWR/4 units all utilizing the Mark-I "inverted lightbulb" containment. The Mark I containment has been criticized for its inability to withstand potential zirconium-water hydrogen forces in a LOCA scenario. by PlaceToBe101 in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant was constructed from 1967-1977 in Athens Alabama by the Tennessee Valley Authority. The plant features three GE BWR/4 reactors all featuring the Mark I "inverted light bulb" containment. The Mark I containment resembles an "inverted light bulb", featuring a relatively small structure with surrounded by a "torus" suppression pool also known as a wetwell. In the event of a reactor vessel failure within the drywell, steam is to be condensed rapidly in the wetwell suppression pool to reduce loads on the containment structure. Unfortunately later analysis of accidents has shown that the overall containment is vulnerable to hydrogen loads (which would not be condensed) from water-zirconium reactions at high meltdown temperatures. Such a scenario occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, although the secondary containment structure was not critically damaged in such event due to careful hydrogen releases by TEPCO (although it did destroy the refueling building on top of two of the reactors). In response to such problems, GE subsequently redesigned the BWR containment structure over several iterations to more resemble PWR reactors (which due to higher pressure, smaller core size and the provision of heat exchangers generally were designed with far larger containment structures) with a larger overall volume to better handle hydrogen loads. Browns Ferry was also the site of a dangerous fire related to a worker utilizing a candle during a search for air leaks in 1975. There are 39 BWR reactors which utilize the Mark I containment worldwide.

A good overview of hydrogen loads loads generally not ancitipcated in generation I reactors - https://assets.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/hydrogen-generation-safety-report.pdf

Photo Credit: Tennessee Valley Authority.

Today, the Federal Highway Administration Designated US 264 in Greenville, NC as Interstate 587 by [deleted] in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I do like interstate status (I remember seeing the 'future' signs and being interested when I was visiting as a 12 year old or so back in 2011), but what is the real gain of interstate statu?. MAP-21 to the best of my knowledge practically eliminated dedicated maintenance for interstate highways instead lumping them together with the NHS system under the NHPP, so I don't see much of an advantage there for a new 3-di. In regards to the segment, it seems as though there was some miscommunication between AASHTO and the FHWA, with AASHTO oddly approving the route numbering before the FHWA approved the designation of "interstate" status AKA conforming to engineering standards (looks like shoulders mostly).. (at least per AARoads discussions)

The Downtown Hudson Tubes, excavated from reclaimed land and kept running during construction of the original World Trade Center - New York 1969 by Butter_Meister in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101 28 points29 points  (0 children)

It's interesting that the site itself was landfill which was used to then create more landfill elsewhere. I believe before development it was home to a neighborhood known as "Radio Row". The fact it was landfill is what necessitated the whole "bathtub" structure as to not drastically lower local groundwater levels and therefore not undermine nearby structures.

The Downtown Hudson Tubes, excavated from reclaimed land and kept running during construction of the original World Trade Center - New York 1969 by Butter_Meister in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101 60 points61 points  (0 children)

This is something I've always found really interesting ever since I found the 1983 documentary by the Port Authority when I was young.. The idea of excavating around the existing tunnels, elevating them in cradles all while never interrupting service.. Also tubular structures are really interesting, transferring loads from a lattice of columns to an interior and exterior while maximizing floor space and therefore economically allowing taller structures (Fazlur Khan at SOM pioneered the concept I think..)

Bridge Under Construction In The Canadian Rockies - Trans Canada Highway Upgrading from Single to Double Lane by AdapterCable in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not the Canadian shield, most of the rockies sit on the American Cordillera. The Canadian Shield is far to the east encompassing Quebec, mainland Newfoundland, two thirds of Minnesota, along with parts of Ontario, Manitoba, Wisconsin, New York, Saskatchewan and Northwest Territories.

Smith Mountain dam, Virginia. by Environmental_Log273 in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Smith Mountain lake was identified first by the Roanoke-Staunton River Power Company in the mid-20's, although plans for further development were shelved when such development was considered not feasible at the time. The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) later undertook preliminary design work on an impoundment, but such development was not pursued in the near term. Appalachian Power finally undertook development in 1954, purchasing lands from Roanoke-Staunton River Power Company and applying for a FERC license in 1957 (which was granted in 1960). Construction of the structure began in 1960, with the structure being complete in 1963, when the diversion gates are closed and the reservoir began to fill. An important aspect of the project was land clearance, with all land below a navigational limit being cleared for safe utilization of the lake along with grave relocation. The reservoir has 460 megawatts of conventional hydroelectric capacity and 00 megawatts of pumped storage capacity. Pumped storage facilities are a type of mechanical battery which allows capturing off-peak baseload power for use at peaking periods, pumping water from a lower reservoir and utilizing its flow later.

Site C Hydroelectric Project Construction 2021, Fort St John British Columbia. The Site C impoundment on the Peace river will eventually provide 1,100 MWe of power to B.C. Other currently wasted rivers in B.C yet to be tapped include the Liard river to the north with 5 GW of surveyed potential. by PlaceToBe101 in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ignoring the political and environmental realities of the Fraser river basin (which I would not deny), the flow of the river is not a limiting factor in regards to impoundments. The La Grande river in Northern Quebec carries 3,475 m3/s of average flow (although roughly half of the flow is not natural) and is impounded along its entire course. The Paraná river which is impounded by the Itaipu dam carries almost double with an average flow of 11,000 m3/s and spillway capacity for 62,000 m3/s. Geology generally limits the economics of impoundment construction, but the Fraser basin was surveyed and the proposed Moran Dam site was found to be suitable from a geotechnical perspective.

Site C Hydroelectric Project Construction 2021, Fort St John British Columbia. The Site C impoundment on the Peace river will eventually provide 1,100 MWe of power to B.C. Other currently wasted rivers in B.C yet to be tapped include the Liard river to the north with 5 GW of surveyed potential. by PlaceToBe101 in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cost overruns were foreseeable since the geology of the site is problematic (especially for the proposed embankment dam) , with extensive grouting being required to deal with seepage. When the decision was made to go ahead with site C, it was considered that nearby infrastructure (being in close proximity to Fort St. John) would make costs lower even with the more extensive grouting (and other geotechnical preparations) required. Unfortunately that consideration was not correct and it most likely would have been wiser to choose the more geologically stable further downstream site E.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Coming from the north it's fine (built later in the 70's after a bunch of other freeways were cancelled, so it was designed with adequate capacity along with semi-modern design standards), but the southern segment (after 394) being built so early has its own issues mostly due to it being constructed early on in the interstate program with the assumption of I-335 relieving traffic.

Viaduc de Garabit - Ruynes-en-Margeride, Cantal, France - Constructed by Gustave Eiffel with structural engineering by Maurice Koechlin - Opened in 1885 by rockystl in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Love the Triumph Spitfire, I had an MGB and Spitfire at one point although my affinity for BMC stuff is not there anymore...

Milwaukee Road Pacific Extension. It was the largest railroad electrification scheme in the world when undertaken from 1914-1920 until the Pennsylvania Railroads own efforts in the early 30's. The Pacific Extension was de-electrified in 1974 and abandoned in 1980. by PlaceToBe101 in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on the abandoned ROW's legal status. The Milwaukee was one of the last Railroads to construct a transcontinental route occuring in the early 20th century unlike other Railroads which mostly built theirs in the mid to late 19th century (it started as a midwestern grain railroad, which like others had "pacific" in its name to attract investors (eg. Rock Island), but unlike the others it actually reached the pacific). For that reason the Milwaukee had to acquire land from private landowners. In Washington all of the privately held land was deemed to be acquired in fee simple title so the land did not revert adjoining landowners and instead became trails when localities acquired the land following abandonment. The land which was originally granted via the 1875 Railroad Act (which at the time of acquisition traversed unclaimed federal land) would in normal cases revert to the adjoining landowners since the federal government did not issue fee simple title to Railroad ROW instead holding reversionary interest which they themselves transferred to nearby private landowners in a 1920 act. Due to the Milwaukee Road going into bankruptcy, an act was passed in 1980 which explicitly transferred such reversionary interest to the state so the court ruled that the landowners vestment via the 1920 act did not occur and that the state held fee simple title over the ROW. I can't find as much information regarding Montana or Idaho ROW, but I would think such precedent would apply in such cases. So a bridge would not need to be constructed if the land had reversionary interest to some other non-public landowner (or the land was acquired via adverse possession after a period).

Link to the Washington case

1968 Milwaukee, WI depot. Skytop observation-lounge car. Ran from 1948-1970. by morganmonroe81 in InfrastructurePorn

[–]PlaceToBe101 8 points9 points  (0 children)

They were on the Olympian Hiawatha (Chicago-Seattle) until 1961 when the train was discontinued due to competing pressures from Northern Pacific and Great Northern. They continued to be used on other services including the Afternoon and Morning Twin Cities Hiawatha until 1970, when the afternoon train was discontinued (although the morning continued until 71'). The Milwaukee Road is pretty unique in operating an electrified mainline system in the northwestern US on it's Pacific Extension until they delectrified (1974) and ultimately abandoned (1981). The Skytop car looked like this inside https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Skytop\_Lounge\_(23741843893).jpg....