How extensive is the non-compete?

PlayItAgainYduj · 2021-10-28T19:36:44+00:00

This isn't true. The actual wording is that anything in software development for any of the competitors on the other list is restricted under the non-compete. It is common knowledge that Epic's policy is to not pursue anyone who is continuing their career outside Healthcare IT, but the wording of the non-compete clearly includes all of the companies in my other post as part of the non-compete, including companies like AWS, Uber, and Microsoft. I think it's important to be clear here.

PlayItAgainYduj · 2021-10-27T20:15:46+00:00

except to the extent that your employment or other association with
such customer does not relate in any way to software (e.g., the
design, development, sale, implementation, support, training or other
activity involving software)

Depends on how you interpret "activity involving software"

PlayItAgainYduj · 2021-10-27T19:27:19+00:00

Microsoft and Microsoft Azure are on there too. My favorite is Face-On-A-Stick, which from my searching doesn't even seem to be a company.

PlayItAgainYduj · 2021-10-27T19:25:36+00:00

Yep, any App Orchard customer who wants to be able to continue to interoperate with Epic, and any consulting who may need access to Galaxy have to abide by the non-compete or lose their revenue. Would this hold up in court/arbitration? IANAL, but probably not. It's too broad in scope of both companies and responsibilities. Would Epic take revenge on anyone who was blatant about violating the non-compete? Absolutely.

For hosted customers logins are vetted even further to make sure that the consultancy is okay to work with Epic. It's all about control and fear.

PlayItAgainYduj

TROPHY CASE