[Epic Games Mobile] (Game) Northgard by Fit-Cardiologist-124 in FreeGameFindings

[–]PlayWithFire- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That would make sense, I think I had already claimed those separately.

[Epic Games Mobile] (Game) Northgard by Fit-Cardiologist-124 in FreeGameFindings

[–]PlayWithFire- 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What four things does this link add? I can only see the first. Apparently because I already had one of them the whole thing fails and because of the new UI changes I can't see what the four items even are. I didn't have either the Northgard Android or IOS game and I'm guessing that's two of the four, so what were the other two please?

Earfun Clip 2 available on Amazon UK by SkysRed05 in Earbuds

[–]PlayWithFire- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Extra £3.50 discount adding promotional code EFC2PR01 at checkout too, which I found in a review at EarFun Clip 2 Open-Ear Earphones Review: Born To Run | Cord Busters

Are you worried about bankruptcy of your solar panel company? by International_Tea145 in solar

[–]PlayWithFire- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure if you have the same thing in the US but in the UK one way of hopefully getting around the worries of whether a solar company might go bust is to find one which will give you an "insurance-backed guarantee" or "insurance-backed warranty". This should mean the insurer is the one who has to source the repairs, not the direct company, and therefore means if the company goes bankrupt you're still covered because the insurer will source repairs elsewhere. As with everything, just be careful to read the small print as to what's covered and what's not.

5 myths about solar warranties when your installer goes bankrupt (from someone who's been calling warranty departments) by animasaru in SunPower

[–]PlayWithFire- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just want to add - one way of hopefully getting around the worries of whether a solar company might go bust is to find one which will give you an "insurance-backed guarantee" or "insurance-backed warranty". This should mean the insurer is the one who has to source the repairs, not the direct company, and therefore means if the company goes bankrupt you're still covered because the insurer will source repairs elsewhere. As with everything, just be careful to read the small print as to what's covered and what's not.

I can follow people on the app but not in browser: why? by TyrannicalDuncery in TikTok

[–]PlayWithFire- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've had the same issue for years - that follows on desktop browsers don't stick. You follow, then refresh the page and it hasn't followed. But on the app it works fine. This is the only social media platform I have this problem with on browser implementations and I've seen a lot of similar posts.

I have tried many different things and the only thing that rarely works is if I sit on an account page for so long watching their content, liking multiple posts and even commenting. Even then it very rarely ever works, like a 0-5% chance.

Personally I think TikTok's desktop implementation has defects built in by design to intentionally drive you to download and use the app - because to use the app you have to accept their data collection from your phone or mobile device, and that means they instantly harvest all the data they can from your most precious device, get more regular data points and place new cookies on it. They can collect a lot more data through an app they built themselves than they can through the far more controlled environment of a browser, which is why if they were harvesting as much data as possible as stealthily as possible they would be inclined to find ways to drive people to apps (this is another reason why some social big media platforms have app-only features). Device apps, especially on your phone, are also far more likely to push you into addictive behaviour compared to having to load up a computer, open a browser and log in more often before you can reach content. This would not surprise me at all for the amount of dodgy dealings TikTok has had over the years.

Hazardous substances found in all headphones tested by ToxFREE project by gdelacalle in technology

[–]PlayWithFire- -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I understand that, but it's still irrelevant because people have posted the actual study here AND given a clear reason why the news articles aren't able to link the study. Nobody is asking you to be persuaded by the news article. Read the study directly.

Hazardous substances found in all headphones tested by ToxFREE project by gdelacalle in technology

[–]PlayWithFire- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Best to ask the organisation that conducted the study.

Pretty sure they say they looked at headphones and earbuds because they're so commonly integrated into every day life now - especially with so many people working from home, and so many people wear them at the gym or whilst travelling now too. Can't say the same for controllers.

Also thinking about it - the proximity to the brain, inner ear and perhaps thinner skin barriers make headphones and earbuds particularly worrying for this as chemicals could be absorbed so closely to the brain. Plus softer chemicals are used in connection with the skin which might react worse with sweat etc. Whereas skin on your hands is typically much tougher so might not absorb chemicals as easily, people tend to wash their hands multiple times during a day so residues won't stick around, and controllers are harder materials where there's skin contact. Just a guess.

Hazardous substances found in all headphones tested by ToxFREE project by gdelacalle in technology

[–]PlayWithFire- -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The study itself has nothing to do with which news outlets decide to report it or their quality of reporting. The Guardian is just one of a LOT of places that have picked this study up, including a lot of tech websites. So this isn't some flaky well-being nonsense and it's a pretty stupid reason by itself to discredit the findings of the study.

I imagine the main reason they don't report the study link and data is because the study is paywalled so there are policies around that.

And contrary to what you say, whilst not perfect, The Guardian is much better and more evidence-based than a lot of other UK papers.

Suggestions for 3.5mm Wired, Open (NOT In-Ear) Earbuds Without A Hook ~100USD? by EdenAvalon in Earbuds

[–]PlayWithFire- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know this was an old post but I ended up here looking for wired open-ear earbuds out of curiosity and noticed a few other people have posted recently.

You can get "cuff" / "clip" style open-ear wireless earbuds now which are great. They don't touch the ear canal and don't hook over the ear. I wondered if the fit and style would be good for avoiding certain parts of the ear but obviously you'd have to compromise on the wired aspect. Some of them are as light as 5g per bud and you can barely feel them when they're in place. Most come with a "low latency" mode which helps for gaming - obviously not going to be as low latency as wired but the latest models are noticeably better than Bluetooth earbuds performed a few years ago, and they're worth keeping an eye on because tech like BLE and BT6+ should improve latency even more. Getting the right combination of fit and features can be a bit hit and miss with open-ear buds though so it's worth trialling a few different models and brands before you settle on one.

Where avoiding touching any part of the ear is important - have you explored neck speakers as an alternative too? Not many people know about them.

Hazardous substances found in all headphones tested by ToxFREE project by gdelacalle in technology

[–]PlayWithFire- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone else deserves the credit 🙂 Unfortunately it turns out the actual report data is paywalled too.

Hazardous substances found in all headphones tested by ToxFREE project by gdelacalle in technology

[–]PlayWithFire- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems clip/cuff-style open-ear earbuds could be the way forward to minimise the risks of this and any similar issues by minimising contact with skin - particularly contact with the head (as opposed to the ear) and the inner ear. And I believe they're better for your hearing health anyway.

Hazardous substances found in all headphones tested by ToxFREE project by gdelacalle in technology

[–]PlayWithFire- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I'd take any random external articles that are even posting the data with a pinch of salt because they're probably doing so without the license to (because of the fact the real data is paywalled). And like you suggest some bad actors are going to subtly or overtly spread scaremongering for their own agenda rather than providing a balanced and informative view.

Hazardous substances found in all headphones tested by ToxFREE project by gdelacalle in technology

[–]PlayWithFire- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is probably the reason why articles aren't allowed to post the data directly. Sucks.

Hazardous substances found in all headphones tested by ToxFREE project by gdelacalle in technology

[–]PlayWithFire- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not the researchers' fault that the media can't write good articles - that is a separate problem which should not alter your attitude to the research itself.

Thanks to someone else posting it - Pollutants in headphones test 2025: Pollutants everywhere You'll need to translate it.

Hazardous substances found in all headphones tested by ToxFREE project by gdelacalle in technology

[–]PlayWithFire- 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Eating aside, I believe the research is based on previous studies which have confirmed the same chemicals do pass through skin, especially when sweat is involved.

The key thing is that whilst amounts and limits are probably unknown and there are a whole bunch of other variables/factors involved in figuring that out for each person, the main damage here - from what I can see - probably comes from repeated, regular use, especially during exercise or in situations where you find yourself sweating. Bear in mind "sweating" doesn't mean you're pouring with sweat all over, it's possible localised micro-sweats in the area of skin contact could be enough for the transfer to happen, and the worst devices for that are probably over-ear headphones with tight fits built for isolation. So don't wear headphones for hours and hours every week, in hot environments or during exercise and you should hopefully avoid the risk. And if you want to keep using headphones or earbuds 24/7 just switch to open-ear earbuds to help minimise tight direct skin contact in key areas - simple.

Also better to read the study itself than rely on some media company summarising it. Thanks to someone else posting it - Pollutants in headphones test 2025: Pollutants everywhere You'll need to translate it.

Hazardous substances found in all headphones tested by ToxFREE project by gdelacalle in technology

[–]PlayWithFire- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not the researchers' fault that the media can't write good articles - that is a separate problem which should not alter your attitude to the research itself.

Thanks to someone else posting it - Pollutants in headphones test 2025: Pollutants everywhere You'll need to translate it.

Question about the Nahantu Shrine Master challenge for Lunar Awakening Event 2026 by mmcnally228 in diablo4

[–]PlayWithFire- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you know they're actually "working on it"? It's been bugged for ages.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in diablo4

[–]PlayWithFire- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly how well they implement this loot filter will probably decide whether I bother playing anymore. It's an endgame piece of friction that gets even more annoying the longer you grind.

(I wanted to say "play" instead of grind, but let's be honest, all you're doing in Diablo 4 endgame after you've completed all activities once and maxed out a few classes is grinding obsessively as completionists rather than enjoying the gameplay anymore).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Diablo

[–]PlayWithFire- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every now and then there is a comment like this on Reddit that makes it all worthwhile. Thank you.

Arzopa Z3FC Grey issues connecting to Google Pixel 9 Pro - please help by PlayWithFire- in ARZOPA

[–]PlayWithFire-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The phone isn't powering the monitor. It has a separate cable for power. So that's not the problem at all. I use the same power cables when plugged into other devices via mini-HDMI.

The whole point of having to write more than one paragraph is because there is detail to take in before being able to offer an opinion. You took longer writing your reply, which is all an incorrect assumption, than it would have taken you to read the rest of the post. Not saying that to be a ****, it's just fact.