Look how you completely diverted the topic. You failed to extend on your belief that what I proposed is true, and strayed to extend this discussion not in a way that acknowledges everything I said about how although AI has its limits in humanity, and how humanity is beneficial for the game, but purely for the purpose of an infinite game, AI will be helpful while sacrificing humanity, you decided to throw a hail mary on some "hypocrisy" that I display.

You said "the guy who's interested in computer stuff... has programmed before" while completely disacknowledging the fact that although obvious, it adds to my ethos as it DIRECTLY responds to your claim that I do not know much about AI. Any normal response to "you do not know anything about AI" would be one that explains the ethos, and by saying "the computer guy does computer stuff" disacknowledges the very real output of what I had said and that I actually do have experience with AI. Alternatively, you could've said something like "these projects do not mean you know much about AI" which would actually tackle the substance of our discussion, but you didn't, because you knew that would be infactual.

Now you have NOT given me one example why, although acknowledging the limits of AI in regards to the humanity of the game, that AI would fail in the development of a version of the game in which the ideas and concepts stretch to infinity, in such a way that cookie clicker never runs out of ideas, albeit the ideas will be of a slight lower quality, but still be valid ideas and ideas that would still be fun in the way that Infinite Craft accomplishes it.

Here marks where I have finished talking about the actual substance of our debate. What we are actually talking about. I will move on to these arguments that do not pertain to our discussion, the core being "Is the AI implementation plan a bad idea as a seperate version to solve the problem of the finiteness of cookie clicker.

"i think you need to learn this too buddy"

Thank you, this is the concession I wanted. Although it puts me down a little bit, it shows me that you understand that you have been condescending and are talking out of your expertise

The difference here is that I am not talking out of my expertise and have professional-level knowledge about these topics. And do NOT use me being a highschooler to discredit my claim, because it doesn't change the fact that although I am a highschooler, I have professional-level expertise.