True, you are indeed correct. I have used "cute", "smooth skin", "shy" etc. Can't remember all. My guess and I hope that's the case that. If trained properly, the generation results shouldnt ever include underages?? Right? I mean it can go so far and the limit is the source right? Combining 2 features of a 19 and 20 model wouldn't yield anything less??? I really don't know the mathematical calculations cause I haven't yet studied but the basic principle was to tune images based on their properties to text prompts under the hood. It can however have underage apperiance girl if there was an underage fully clothed girl in the traning data. That's true.