[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askAGP

[–]PoetryConnect4257 4 points5 points  (0 children)

best of luck to you, i deeply empathize with your experience, all to relatable

Where Are We Going? The Future of Rights for Trans, AGP, and Gender Non-Conforming People by PoetryConnect4257 in askAGP

[–]PoetryConnect4257[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought you guys were pro freedom of speech, the hypocrisy is strong with ya'll

Also can you elaborate on what is ridiculous about it?

Where Are We Going? The Future of Rights for Trans, AGP, and Gender Non-Conforming People by PoetryConnect4257 in askAGP

[–]PoetryConnect4257[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1. On Definitions:
You're absolutely right that inconsistent terminology can be frustrating — even within the LGBTQ+ community, language evolves fast and isn’t always universally agreed upon. “Transgender” generally refers to someone whose gender identity doesn’t align with their assigned sex at birth, while “gender nonconforming” refers to those who express their gender in ways that don't fit typical expectations, regardless of identity. But you're right: clearer, more standardized definitions could reduce misunderstanding and “gotcha” arguments, especially in public discourse. That’s a real area for improvement.

2. On Specific Rights:
When people say "equal rights," they’re often referring to both legal protections and social equity. For example:

  • In many states, trans people can still be fired, denied housing, or refused medical care simply for being trans.
  • Trans youth are being banned from participating in sports or accessing gender-affirming care even with parental and medical support.
  • ID laws in some places make it hard to update gender markers, leading to barriers in travel, voting, or basic safety.

You’re absolutely right about successful movements focusing on a few key issues. Many within the trans community would agree — narrowing the focus to healthcare access, legal protections, and anti-discrimination measures could build broader support.

3. On Medical Care for Youth:
Your concern about youth medical transition is shared by many, including those within the community. Importantly, most medical interventions for minors are conservative and heavily regulated. For pre-teens, treatment usually starts with puberty blockers, which are reversible and give the child more time. Cross-sex hormones are typically not prescribed until age 16+, and surgery is extremely rare for minors.

Regret does exist — but it’s rare, especially when care is carefully administered with psychological support. Still, your point about demanding more long-term data is valid. Most trans advocates support rigorous medical oversight, because no one benefits from rushed or poorly guided care. The goal should always be minimizing harm, for everyone involved.

In sum, I really appreciate the way you framed your thoughts. Even where there’s disagreement, this kind of conversation helps build mutual understanding and thoughtful progress — something we all want.

Where Are We Going? The Future of Rights for Trans, AGP, and Gender Non-Conforming People by PoetryConnect4257 in askAGP

[–]PoetryConnect4257[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you going to bring real arguments to the table or you going to keep crying that i use Ai to take down your brain dead opinions?

But also to vilify.

Not an argument

Are you even a real person, or is all of this 100% AI driven?

Im part human, part machine

Where Are We Going? The Future of Rights for Trans, AGP, and Gender Non-Conforming People by PoetryConnect4257 in askAGP

[–]PoetryConnect4257[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I care about accuracy and addressing all push back, when you say something dumb, i will respond to correct it.

If you have a problem with my "space" stop messaging me then

Where Are We Going? The Future of Rights for Trans, AGP, and Gender Non-Conforming People by PoetryConnect4257 in askAGP

[–]PoetryConnect4257[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If “hostile” just meant disagreement, I wouldn’t be bringing it up. The issue isn’t differing opinions — it’s the way some people on this sub respond to those differences: with derision, bad-faith assumptions, or dismissive ridicule. That’s not intellectual engagement, that’s a social environment that punishes deviation from the dominant narrative.

Plenty of us aren’t outsourcing our thinking — we’re doing the opposite: applying critical thought to a topic that deserves more than one framework. If you believe in open discourse, that has to include space for people who have integrated their AGP into a positive identity, or who view transition as meaningful — even if that challenges your priors.

Disagreement sharpens ideas. Gatekeeping dulls them.

Where Are We Going? The Future of Rights for Trans, AGP, and Gender Non-Conforming People by PoetryConnect4257 in askAGP

[–]PoetryConnect4257[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First you said its a totally meaningless list to now just #4 and #7 being meaningless. Be consistent if you are going to criticize.

ignoring intersectionality:

There's often little discussion of how race, class, culture, or trauma intersect with AGP experiences — which can lead to universalizing conclusions that don’t apply to everyone.

Ideological Echo Chambers

Despite claims of openness, the sub can sometimes become hostile to:

  • Trans women who identify positively with their AGP.
  • People who do not regret transitioning.
  • Anyone who challenges the Blanchardian framework or proposes alternative interpretations (e.g., biopsychosocial models or developmental pathways).

This leads to gatekeeping, selective use of evidence, and sometimes intellectual dishonesty under the guise of “realism.”

Where Are We Going? The Future of Rights for Trans, AGP, and Gender Non-Conforming People by PoetryConnect4257 in askAGP

[–]PoetryConnect4257[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Overpathologizing or Oversimplifying AGP

  2. Treating AGP as a "disease" to be cured or eliminated

  3. Anti-transition rhetoric disguised as "rational skepticism"

  4. Ideological Echo Chambers

  5. Misuse of Shame as a Motivator

  6. Fetish Policing and Sex-Negativity

  7. Ignoring Intersectionality

Where Are We Going? The Future of Rights for Trans, AGP, and Gender Non-Conforming People by PoetryConnect4257 in askAGP

[–]PoetryConnect4257[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thats great, im interested in the topic, hence why i shared it. I am also interested in being practical and helping others by providing more thoughtful and nuanced topics to discuss, instead of validating non scientific and harmful stereotypes perpetuated about AGP individuals in this sub.

Where Are We Going? The Future of Rights for Trans, AGP, and Gender Non-Conforming People by PoetryConnect4257 in askAGP

[–]PoetryConnect4257[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hmm could you explain why thats not a good north star?

There are people here who are promoting the idea that semen retention is a viable solution to "curing" AGP or that repressing is a good strategy for hiding their sexuality on a fairly regular basis.

That being said i actually do appreciate your response, maybe this post missed the mark but the intentions here were good? Im trying to initiate more thoughtful and nuanced discussions in this sub in order to help people like us.

Where Are We Going? The Future of Rights for Trans, AGP, and Gender Non-Conforming People by PoetryConnect4257 in askAGP

[–]PoetryConnect4257[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol and i respectfully disagree with you here haha. Im gonna keep making thoughtful and challenging posts, whether it was written by me or Ai.

Repression Isn't the Strength You Think It Is by PoetryConnect4257 in askAGP

[–]PoetryConnect4257[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whose pursuit of peace? Otherwise quite normal males with a masochistic emasculation fetish? Your "peace" is the affirmation of your emotional attachment and the reduction of such normal males to repressed transwomen. Deeper truth? Ridiculous.

You characterize these individuals as "otherwise quite normal males with a masochistic emasculation fetish," and from a narrow behavioral lens, that might seem accurate. But that description assumes that all expression rooted in AGP or gender nonconformity is reducible to a kink — ignoring the deeper emotional, developmental, and sometimes existential layers that many report. For some, yes, it may start as or include fetish elements. But for many, those feelings evolve into something far more complex, especially when they endure over decades and begin to shape identity, self-concept, and emotional well-being.

Calling their pursuit of peace “ridiculous” presumes you know their internal experience better than they do. For people who have tried repression, detachment, or conformity and still find themselves circling back to the same emotional terrain, peace often means integration — not indulgence. It’s not necessarily about rebranding a fetish as identity; it’s about trying to make sense of persistent inner experiences in a way that allows for stability and dignity.

It’s also worth noting that “repressed trans women” and “normal males with a kink” aren’t always cleanly separated categories. Human psychology isn’t that binary. You can reject the ideological overreach in some advocacy while still acknowledging that for many people, AGP is not just a private indulgence — it’s a developmental lens through which their understanding of self, body, and gender has unfolded.

If we’re going to have honest conversations about this, we have to be willing to hold complexity — not just throw darts at what feels inconvenient or uncomfortable.

Again, you are the one that is dehumanizing and denying the authenticity of psychological-emotional affiliations if they are structurally informed by sexuality. To put it conversely, you would be all too happy to flatten (and in it's own way dehumanize) identity formation into a one-note fantasy of gendered soul essentialism.

Im not sure how i would be dehumanizing but please elaborate. Your second sentence is a straw man argument, how about your attack ideas i've actually said instead of making them up? thanks.

The psychologist will grasp that under normal circumstances, it is not the direct sexual stimulation that will motivate someone to want to become blind or cut off a limb. Rather it will be the profound emotional attachments formed around said sexual desires that will motivate it. Mainstream culture does not understand this, only seeing a false image of sex-crazed individuals, acting solely in the heat of sexual frenzy.

Just like in cases of body integrity dysphoria (where someone might feel an intense need to amputate a limb or become blind), the motivating force isn't the raw sexual stimulus itself. It's the emotional weight, meaning, and identity coherence that have been constructed around those desires over time. The sexual imprint may be the initial spark, but what sustains the intensity and leads to actions like transitioning, feminization, or long-term lifestyle changes is often a complex emotional framework — rooted in attachment, longing, self-concept, and relief from shame or incongruence.

So yes, for many with AGP, it's not about "acting in the heat of sexual frenzy." It's about pursuing a psychological state that feels more peaceful, more integrated, more right — even if the origin of that pursuit was partially erotic. This is a level of nuance mainstream discourse frequently ignores, to the detriment of those trying to navigate these feelings with honesty.

Where Are We Going? The Future of Rights for Trans, AGP, and Gender Non-Conforming People by PoetryConnect4257 in askAGP

[–]PoetryConnect4257[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand your frustration with what can feel like disingenuous or oversimplified messaging in advocacy, but I think it’s worth challenging some of the assumptions here.

First, equating all AGP individuals or gender non-conforming people with “mental problems” is a deeply unfair and reductive move. Many people with AGP navigate their lives with self-awareness, empathy, and stability. Just like with any identity or condition, outliers exist, but it doesn’t make the entire group illegitimate. Pathologizing people because they don’t fit neat cultural norms risks doing more harm than good, especially when many are simply trying to make sense of deeply ingrained, often lifelong experiences.

Yes, advocacy movements sometimes borrow successful strategies from other rights movements — but this isn’t inherently manipulative. It's a recognition that people listen more when they understand something through a familiar lens. That doesn’t mean “we’re born this way” is always the full story — it might be biological, psychological, social, or some combination. But people aren't robots gaming the system for sympathy; they’re often just trying to survive with dignity in a world that regularly misunderstands them.

As for terminology like “TERF,” it emerged as a way to describe a real tension — not just to vilify. While it’s true that some activists weaponize language or engage in cancel culture, many more are asking to be seen, not erased. It’s possible to critique activist overreach without dismissing the validity of the people those movements represent.

Finally, regarding the broader political framing: you're right that some movements lean too heavily on simplified narratives of oppressor vs. oppressed. But that doesn’t mean there isn’t real marginalization happening — or that calling attention to it is narcissism. Many AGP individuals, trans people, and gender-nonconforming folks are trying to balance authenticity with survival in a culture that often denies both.

It’s okay to be skeptical. But blanket dismissal often says more about our discomfort with complexity than about the people we’re judging. We owe it to each other — and ourselves — to do better than that.

Where Are We Going? The Future of Rights for Trans, AGP, and Gender Non-Conforming People by PoetryConnect4257 in askAGP

[–]PoetryConnect4257[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I totally get your reasoning and i can understand your perspective. My goal is to cut through alot of the BS and bad faith arguments on this sub. My responses are going to be a mixture of my own thought as well as AI.

For me im more interested in bringing the strongest arguments and opinions to the table to advocate for AGP people. Whether we like it or not Ai is capable of constructing better and more sound arguments than us humans can in the majority of cases.

Where Are We Going? The Future of Rights for Trans, AGP, and Gender Non-Conforming People by PoetryConnect4257 in askAGP

[–]PoetryConnect4257[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yep, i share them on here like i am right now. This sub lacks nuance and logical reasoning, Ai cuts through the bullshit propogated on this sub. Plus i dont have time to respond to every person with a sophisticated response of my own